Hello, Nups1324. I can think of far worse users to imitate on this site than GMATNinja or MartyTargetTestPrep. I enjoyed the similar phrasing to what the former might say—e.g., A is out—in your treatment of (A); I chuckled when I got to the confession in (E). I would encourage you to study their responses further, let the words and ideas sink in. I think Marty best explained the issues with (A) and (B) in his earlier post. As for (C), the meaning is quite hard to follow when you encounter back-to-back placeholders (it cannot be... it is), and some grammarians take issue with split infinitives, such as the one on display in be legitimately put forth. Without going any further, there would be two questionable features in (C), and doubts are not what you want in seeking a correct answer. I will be honest and say that I eliminated (E) right away, as we are not in a position to judge whether the information that follows that is factual, and the sentence conveys that young people are, in fact, at fault: the fact that young people are at fault. Other sentences suggest the opposite.
Keep engaging with the questions and offering insights when you have them so that the whole community can benefit.
- Andrew