GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2019, 14:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 29
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2011, 06:37
2
23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

76% (01:38) correct 24% (01:55) wrong based on 1114 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?


A. Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

C. The outlay of $10.00for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders

D. The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system

E. Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.


ID - CR01900


Another version of this question is published in OG2019: https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-city-of- ... 71655.html
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 163
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2011, 12:16
C - the assumption is that $10 is not prohibitive for the low income people. After reading the question, I was looking for an answer that's along the lines of "low income people don't have the cash flow to buy $20 in fares at once" but this answer is not amongst the choices given.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 45
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2011, 09:53
1
Jasontuyj2012 wrote:
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

a) Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

b) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

c) The outlay of $10.00for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders

d) The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system

e) Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.


C. The critics assume a $10.00 outlay would not be prohibitive otherwise no reason for them to propose a $10.00 outlay.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 31 Jul 2015
Posts: 29
Location: India
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2017, 07:48
Jasonammex wrote:
Why B is not right?


B) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offerthan
would other riders
.

A per critics , 18-token for $20 would be prohibitive of the lower income riders. In other words , all types of riders should get equal advantage. No bias .
So, they assumed that the 9-token scheme will not pose any problem for the lower income riders.
Reading once, option B seems to be the perfect contender. However, as highlighted, the 9-token scheme offer is more beneficial to the low-income riders than the other riders. Therefore, this makes the 9-token scheme biased towards the low income riders.

I hope you get it now.
_________________
Never give up !
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 169
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2019, 01:54
Can someone explain option B(meaning of option B and why it is not an assumption)?
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 207
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V34
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2019, 04:11
mallya12 wrote:
Can someone explain option B(meaning of option B and why it is not an assumption)?

Think of it as.. you have made a plan that instead of increasing money from 18 to 20 increase it from 9 to 10.

And option says that this will benefit the poor.

But what about the ones who are rich? It might be that they welcome the increase of 20 because they have a longer commute and a rise from 9 to 10 will harm them as the ones who have shorter commute ( or maybe some other reason)

The assumptions on which the argument depends has two folds:
1) as mentioned by C
2) the Rich does not pose a problem.

As per option B it seems that the local have more advantage and thus this assumption is not correct as it has a potential to fail the plan to raise the amount from 9 to 10 instead of 18 to 20 considering the advantages of the rich class.

Posted from my mobile device
Target Test Prep Representative
User avatar
P
Status: Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 618
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2019, 12:09
2
Jasontuyj2012 wrote:
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?


The assumption will be information necessary for the EVIDENCE in this argument to support the CONCLUSION of this argument.

In this case, the conclusion is not stated directly. However we can gather that the following is the conclusion:

    Selling 9 fare tokens for $10 is a better way to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents than is selling 18 fare tokens for $20.

The evidence supporting this conclusion is the following:

    A $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

Quote:
A. Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

Incorrect. Going from the fact that a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders to the conclusion that selling 9 fare tokens for $10 is a better way to alleviate the burden on low income riders does not require assuming that the number of low-income riders will not decrease as a result of the fare increase.

Quote:
B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.


Incorrect. Going from the fact that a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders to the conclusion that selling 9 fare tokens for $10 is a better way to alleviate the burden on low income riders does not require assuming anything about what other riders would do. All we are concerned with here is the effect on low-income riders.

Quote:
C. The outlay of $10.00 for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders.


Correct. Going from the fact that a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders to the conclusion that selling 9 fare tokens for $10 is a better way to alleviate the burden on low income riders require assuming that low income riders can actually afford to spend $10 at a time. If they can't, then selling discounted tokens in $10 packages won't affect the burden on low income riders.

Quote:
D. The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system.


Incorrect. Going from the fact that a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders to the conclusion that selling 9 fare tokens for $10 is a better way to alleviate the burden on low income riders does not require assuming that the fare increase is needed.

Quote:
E. Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.


Incorrect. This answer is a trap, as one could get the impression that the degree to which means of transportation other than buses are available in Workney could be a factor in how much of a burden the fare increase is on lower income workers.

The thing is that we are looking not at all factors that would affect how much of a burden low-income riders experience, but only at whether offering $10 packages of tokens is better for them than offering $20 packages of tokens, and going from the fact that a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders to the conclusion that selling 9 fare tokens for $10 is a better way to alleviate the burden on low income riders does not require assuming anything about whether there are other forms of public transportation in Workney.

The correct answer is C.
_________________

Marty Murray

Chief Curriculum and Content Architect

Marty@targettestprep.com
TTP - Target Test Prep Logo
122 Reviews

5-star rated online GMAT quant
self study course

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
D
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2857
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2019, 14:08
2
mallya12 wrote:
Can someone explain option B(meaning of option B and why it is not an assumption)?

The "alternate proposal" suggest by critics in the passage is that "9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00," rather than 18 fare tokens be sold for $20.00. The critics' reasoning is that "a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders."

Notice that this reasoning only depends on making the bus fare less prohibitive for low-income riders. It does not mention the possible effect of the alternative proposal on other riders.

Now take another look at (B):

Quote:
B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

This answer choice sets up a comparison between low-income riders and other riders. But according to the passage, the critics have only expressed concern about the outlay for low-income riders. We don't know whether or not "other riders" also take advantage of the 9-token offer, and critics don't necessarily need to care about "other riders" in order to make this alternative proposal.

Because the critics' proposal is not affected one way or another by this answer choice, (B) is not an assumption that the alternative proposal requires.

I hope this helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 01 Jan 2019
Posts: 66
Location: Canada
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.24
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2019, 06:02
GMATNinja wrote:
mallya12 wrote:
Can someone explain option B(meaning of option B and why it is not an assumption)?

The "alternate proposal" suggest by critics in the passage is that "9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00," rather than 18 fare tokens be sold for $20.00. The critics' reasoning is that "a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders."

Notice that this reasoning only depends on making the bus fare less prohibitive for low-income riders. It does not mention the possible effect of the alternative proposal on other riders.

Now take another look at (B):

Quote:
B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

This answer choice sets up a comparison between low-income riders and other riders. But according to the passage, the critics have only expressed concern about the outlay for low-income riders. We don't know whether or not "other riders" also take advantage of the 9-token offer, and critics don't necessarily need to care about "other riders" in order to make this alternative proposal.

Because the critics' proposal is not affected one way or another by this answer choice, (B) is not an assumption that the alternative proposal requires.

I hope this helps!



Hi GMATNinja

Why is C correct? I don’t understand if C is negated, the conclusion doesn’t fall apart?

Posted from my mobile device
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4778
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2019, 08:25
Shef08 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
mallya12 wrote:
Can someone explain option B(meaning of option B and why it is not an assumption)?

The "alternate proposal" suggest by critics in the passage is that "9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00," rather than 18 fare tokens be sold for $20.00. The critics' reasoning is that "a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders."

Notice that this reasoning only depends on making the bus fare less prohibitive for low-income riders. It does not mention the possible effect of the alternative proposal on other riders.

Now take another look at (B):

Quote:
B. Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

This answer choice sets up a comparison between low-income riders and other riders. But according to the passage, the critics have only expressed concern about the outlay for low-income riders. We don't know whether or not "other riders" also take advantage of the 9-token offer, and critics don't necessarily need to care about "other riders" in order to make this alternative proposal.

Because the critics' proposal is not affected one way or another by this answer choice, (B) is not an assumption that the alternative proposal requires.

I hope this helps!



Hi GMATNinja

Why is C correct? I don’t understand if C is negated, the conclusion doesn’t fall apart?

Posted from my mobile device


The Stimulus states " Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders."

The statement suggests that shelling out $20 will be difficult for the low income group , as such a $10 token will be helpful and will not pinch the pockets of the low income group who has low disposable income.

Now, if we negate option (C) we get " The outlay of $10.00for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would be prohibitive for low-income bus riders " this clearly shatters the conlusion drawn by the Critic in the last line of the stimulus where he suggested about the $ 10 fare token...

Hence, Answer has to be (C)
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Apr 2018
Posts: 18
Location: India
Schools: NUS '20
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2019, 22:59
mrblack wrote:
C - the assumption is that $10 is not prohibitive for the low income people. After reading the question, I was looking for an answer that's along the lines of "low income people don't have the cash flow to buy $20 in fares at once" but this answer is not amongst the choices given.


i am also thinking the same.Therefore, C is only the best option left.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose   [#permalink] 19 Apr 2019, 22:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, propose

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne