Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:37 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Comparisons|   Modifiers|   Pronouns|                        
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,514
Own Kudos:
5,728
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,514
Kudos: 5,728
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,647
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatbusters
egmat
I am a but confused here.
Please provide some insights on the Verb+ing usage.
Please clarify whether V+ing modifier must make sense with the subject of the preceding clause or not?



Hello gmatbusters,

Thank you for the query. :-)


The answer to your question is "yes". The action denoted by the comma + verb-ing modifier must make sense with the doer of the modified action. It is so because every action must be accounted for, i. e., it must have a doer.

Please review the our popular article that delves deep into the topic. The article is replete with relevant details and official examples to make the concept easy to understand:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/usage-of-verb-ing-modifiers-135220.html


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
chandan1988
Joined: 23 May 2015
Last visit: 06 May 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 21
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.


A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it
B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them
C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it
D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it
E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them


OG 2017 New Question
Hi GMATNinja , mikemcgarry any other expert reading this

please explain how does "it" in option C clearly refers to seal , why does not "it" refer to animal
avatar
mayursurya
Joined: 16 Aug 2014
Last visit: 16 Mar 2025
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 209
Posts: 36
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I choose A over C.
And In C
Quote:
C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it
found "than do those" in C bit wordy.
expert help needed.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatVerbal
User avatar
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,694
Own Kudos:
15,177
 [13]
Given Kudos: 766
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,694
Kudos: 15,177
 [13]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question to narrow it down to the correct answer. First, here is the original question with the main differences between the 5 options highlighted in orange:

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.

(A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it
(B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them
(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it
(D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it
(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them

While the 5 options have a lot of differences, here are just 2 that we can focus on for now. Each of these items will eliminate 2-3 options, which will hopefully leave us with only one option left:

1. "any other animal" vs. "do those of any other animal" (parallelism & comparisons)
2. "it" vs. "them" (pronoun-antecedent agreement)


Let's begin with #1 on our list: "any other animal" vs. "do those of any other animal." We can see that in the original sentence, these phrases are part of a comparison:

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.

What are the two things being compared here? The one part of this comparison that remains constant among all 5 options is "the eyes of the elephant seal." Remember that the two things being compared MUST be parallel. This means that the sentence MUST compare the eyes of elephant seals to the eyes of other animals! Let's see which sentences do this correctly, and eliminate those that aren't parallel:

(A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it --> NOT PARALLEL (compares eyes to any other animal)
(B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them --> NOT PARALLEL (compares eyes to any other animal)
(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it --> PARALLEL ("those of" is referring to the eyes of other animals, so we're comparing eyes to eyes, which is parallel)
(D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it --> NOT PARALLEL ("they" is referring to the eyes of the elephant seal, which is still comparing eyes to any other animal)
(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them --> PARALLEL ("those of" is referring to the eyes of other animals, so we're comparing eyes to eyes, which is parallel)

We can eliminate options A, B, & D because the comparisons made in each sentence are not parallel in type. Instead of comparing the eyes of the elephant seal to the eyes of other animals, they compare the eyes of the elephant seal to the entire bodies of any other animals, which isn't parallel.

Now that we're left with only 2 options, let's tackle #2 on our list: it vs. them. This is an issue of pronoun-antecedent agreement! We need to look closely to determine what each pronoun is referring back to, and make sure they match up:

(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it

This is CORRECT! The singular pronoun "it" is referring back to the singular antecedent "the elephant seal."

(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them

This is INCORRECT for a couple reasons. First, the singular pronoun "it" in this sentence is actually referring back to the plural "eyes," which isn't parallel. Also, the plural pronoun "them" is referring back to the singular "elephant seal," which is also not parallel. To fix this, the phrase would have to say "they allow it."

There you have it - option C is the correct choice! It's the only option that uses parallelism correctly throughout the entire sentence! By focusing on two main difference between the options, we were able to narrow down the options quickly to find the correct choice.


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
avatar
duybachhpvn
Joined: 23 Sep 2014
Last visit: 03 Mar 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 117
Posts: 21
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Hi GmatNinja,

In option C here, could you help explain why we need to have "do" after than? Can we eliminate it? I dont really understand why we have to include "do" here

Also, if we need to have "do", shouldn't it be placed as "more quickly than those of any other animal yet tested DO"?

Thanks a lot.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
duybachhpvn
GMATNinja
Hi GmatNinja,

In option C here, could you help explain why we need to have "do" after than? Can we eliminate it? I dont really understand why we have to include "do" here

Also, if we need to have "do", shouldn't it be placed as "more quickly than those of any other animal yet tested DO"?

Thanks a lot.
Excellent question! The only time you need "do" is if the sentence is unclear or ambiguous without it.

For example, "Jen owns more puppies than Jack and Diane." This sentence could be interpreted two ways:

    1) that Jack and Diane are puppies Jen owns, but they're not her only dogs, or
    2) that the number of puppies Jack and Diane own is greater than the number of puppies that Jen owns.

If we want to make it clear that we prefer the second interpretation, we'd write, ""Jen owns more puppies than Jack and Diane do." (Or, to address your second question, we could write "Jen owns more puppies than do Jack and Diane." Changing the placement of "do" doesn't alter the meaning of the sentence.)

Otherwise, it's up to the discretion of the writer. In (C), if you were to remove "do," there still only seems to be one sensible way to interpret the sentence, so I think that construction would be fine. Fortunately, the other four answer choices all have definitive comparison errors in which eyes are compared to animals, so there's no need to waste your energy worrying about the use of "do" here.

Put another way, the GMAT would never ask you to choose between "The eyes of a seal move faster than do those of any other animal" and "The eyes of a seal move faster than those of any other animal." Both are fine, so we'd have to look for other decision points.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
ADS2021
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 28 Oct 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 6
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can somebody please explain 'than do those of' in option C. Shouldn't it be 'than those of'

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ADS2021
Can somebody please explain 'than do those of' in option C. Shouldn't it be 'than those of'
When do is used in place of a verb the way it has in option C, we can change the normal order in which the subject and verb occur.

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested...

is another way of saying

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than those of any other animal yet tested do...
or
The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than those of any other animal yet tested adapt to darkness...

Adding the do makes the sentence clearer. Take a look at what happens if we drop the do (if that is what you were asking):

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than those of any other animal yet tested...

This is not wrong, but it could be interpreted as "X adapts to A more quickly than B".
User avatar
ykejariw
Joined: 25 Nov 2018
Last visit: 22 Jul 2023
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
Posts: 49
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it??to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.

(A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it

(B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them

(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it

(D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it

(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them



hi team,??



in the above questions, option A states that -:

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than [the eyes] any other animal yet tested.

my first question -:

1. why doesn't the elipses work in this case? 'the eyes' is already stated in the first part of the sentence and it can be considered in the second part.

2. according to one of the posts on E-gmat, an example sentence was -:

" John cooks better piza than his wife"

the only intended/logical comparison could be between john and his wife and hence the comparison is correct.


similarly in the prompt, the only logical comparison could be between the eyes of the elephant and the eyes of any other animal.??

we can't logically compare the eyes of the elephant to any other animal.??

hence, to add "those of" makes it redundant.??

kindly validate my thinking process and let me know where i am going wrong.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ykejariw
The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it??to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.

(A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it

(B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them

(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it

(D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it

(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them



hi team,??



in the above questions, option A states that -:

The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than [the eyes] any other animal yet tested.

my first question -:

1. why doesn't the elipses work in this case? 'the eyes' is already stated in the first part of the sentence and it can be considered in the second part.

2. according to one of the posts on E-gmat, an example sentence was -:

" John cooks better piza than his wife"

the only intended/logical comparison could be between john and his wife and hence the comparison is correct.


similarly in the prompt, the only logical comparison could be between the eyes of the elephant and the eyes of any other animal.??

we can't logically compare the eyes of the elephant to any other animal.??

hence, to add "those of" makes it redundant.??

kindly validate my thinking process and let me know where i am going wrong.
Good question! For the e-gmat example, it ultimately comes down to whether there's a viable alternative meaning.

For the sentence "John cooks better pizza than his wife [does]," there's only one possible meaning: the pizza John cooks is the better than the pizza his wife cooks. No one would read that sentence and wonder if the pizza John cooks is better than the wife John cooks. (Which is exactly why Cannibal John keeps getting away with his hideous crimes. :shocked ) Because there's no ambiguity, this example is fine. The omitted word, "does" is implied.

However, if I write "John loves pizza more than his wife," there'd be two viable interpretations:

    1) John loves pizza more than his wife loves pizza, or
    2) John loves pizza more than he loves his wife.

If one interpretation of a sentence leads to a family ordering Mexican food for dinner, and the other leads to divorce, that's a problem. :)

So that's one difference. The other difference is that in the e-gmat example, the helping verb, "does," is omitted. In the elephant seal example a pronoun is omitted. It would be very hard to interpret the meaning of any sentence if the reader had to consider the possibility that shadow pronouns had been left out, but implied.

Take another look at one of the faulty comparisons:

    "The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested."

The most straightforward way to read this sentence is that the eyes of the seal are being compared to other animals. Is it possible one might compare eyes to, say, a tiger? I suppose. But the context here makes it far more logical for the eyes of one animal to be better at adjusting than the eyes of another. Because "those" makes this comparison clearer and more logical, it's better.

I hope that helps!
avatar
Rishikesh92
Joined: 22 Jan 2019
Last visit: 14 Jan 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.93
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
"The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it to hunt efficiently."

Logic is the cornerstone of SC, especially pronoun reference. “It” in this context will not refer to any other animal because there are over one million animal species on the earth. Which one shall we take? - The point here is that if we take ‘it’ to refer to the eyes, then we end up meaning that the Seal’s adaptation allows the eyes to hunt efficiently, which is illogical. For all that, we know that the eyes do not hunt but the animal does. Hence, “it” decisively refers to the Seal.

Thanks sir,
Seal here is part of prepositional phrase "of the elephant seal". I understand only noun can be antecedent of pronoun.
Is this okay.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rishikesh92

Thanks sir,
Seal here is part of prepositional phrase "of the elephant seal". I understand only noun can be antecedent of pronoun.
Is this okay.


Hello Rishikesh92,

Although your question is not directed to me, here is my explanation for the same. :-)

A noun in a prepositional phrase cannot act as a subject of a clause. This is the only restriction on a noun in a prepositional phrase.

A pronoun or a noun modifier can very well refer to/modify a noun in a prepositional phrase. Hence, in the correct answer choice, the pronoun it correctly refers to the noun the elephant seal. Even if the elephant seal is preceded by a preposition, it itself is a noun entity.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
avatar
Soubhik_Bardhan
Joined: 10 Dec 2016
Last visit: 07 Feb 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V51 (Online)
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V51 (Online)
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi experts / egmat / EducationAisle,

I got this right, but wanted to make sure that my understanding of why ellipsis can't be used here is right as well.

Original question: The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.

In this case, the reason we can't use ellipsis of the format (The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than the eyes of any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters) is because omitting the eyes of in the above sentence can potentially make the meaning of the statement ambiguous. There is a real possibility of the sentence comparing the adaptability of elephant's eyes with the adaptability of another animal. If there were no such possibility of comparison, use of ellipsis in the above statement would have been fine.

Is my understanding right? Thank you!
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Soubhik_Bardhan
omitting the eyes of in the above sentence can potentially make the meaning of the statement ambiguous. There is a real possibility of the sentence comparing the adaptability of elephant's eyes with the adaptability of another animal.
Correct analysis Soubhik.

Since there is ambiguity, we have to explicitly mention eyes in the second half of the sentence, to remove the ambiguity.
avatar
Suneha123
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Last visit: 05 Apr 2021
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Status:BDM
Posts: 19
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In C, I have a doubt - "allowing it" is a verb-ing modifier which should refer back to the doer which is "eyes" . Though "it" is referring back to elephant seal as per the intended meaning but the doer is "eyes" so isn't this sentence grammatically incorrect? Can anybody explain this query?
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Suneha123
In C, I have a doubt - "allowing it" is a verb-ing modifier which should refer back to the doer which is "eyes" . Though "it" is referring back to elephant seal as per the intended meaning but the doer is "eyes" so isn't this sentence grammatically incorrect? Can anybody explain this query?
GMATNinja
Consider the following example:

    "The billionaire opened part of her mansion to the public, allowing visitors to gawk at the grotesque display of wealth."

The "-ing" modifier ("allowing...") describes the entire preceding clause in this case. It doesn't just modify the billionaire -- instead, it modifies the action taken by the billionaire. What allowed visitors to gawk? The fact that the billionaire opened part of her mansion to the public.

The opening of part of the mansion allows something to happen. And the subject of that something clearly does NOT have to be the billionaire herself.

The same is true in choice (C). The fact that the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly {...} allows something to happen. The subject of that something does NOT have to be the subject of the preceding clause. In this case, the action described in the preceding clause allows the elephant seal to hunt efficiently.

As discussed in this post, the "it" is admittedly a bit ambiguous. But there is nothing unambiguously WRONG with (C), and it's better than the other four options. :)

I hope that helps!
User avatar
GKomoku
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Last visit: 23 Mar 2022
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
953
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3,681
Status:To infinity and beyond
Location: Kazakhstan
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Posts: 301
Kudos: 953
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.

(A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it

(B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them

(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it

(D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it

(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16321974-200-deep-diving-seals-are-quick-change-champions/

IN BRIEF 31 July 1999
Deep-diving seals are quick-change champions

THE eyes of elephant seals adapt to darkness more quickly than those of any other animal tested, allowing them to hunt in the gloomy depths.

David Levenson and Ronald Schusterman of the University of California at Santa Cruz put a trained elephant seal into a light-proof box. By touching a ball to receive a fish reward, their subject could indicate whether it could see a series of dim flashes of light. The animal’s eyes reached maximum sensitivity within 6 minutes—the same time it takes the seals to reach their feeding depth of between 300 and 700 metres.

As the researchers will report in a forthcoming issue of Marine Mammal Science, the eyes of a shallow-diving harbour seal or a human took roughly 20 minutes to adjust to the darkness.

Elephant Seal

(A) Comparison (X more than Y);

(B) Comparison (X more than Y); Pronoun (them)

(C) CORRECT

(D) Comparison (X more than Y);

(E) Pronoun (it; them)

First glance

The opening split is between “The eyes” and “Because.” There isn’t a great clue here, though because does indicate some kind of cause-effect relationship, so check whether this meaning is appropriate for the sentence.

Issues

(1) Comparison: X more than Y

The words more than are a comparison marker; check the X and Y elements to ensure that they follow comparison rules.

The original sentence compares the eyes of the elephant seal to any other animal yet tested. It’s not appropriate to compare one animal’s eyes to another entire animal. Compare eyes to eyes or whole animals to whole animals. Scan the other choices to see whether any repeat this error. Note that in (D), the pronoun they refers to eyes. Eliminate answers (A), (B), and (D) for a bad comparison.

(2) Pronoun: them; it

The end of each answer switches between it and them. Which is correct?

In the original sentence, it properly refers to the elephant seal; the reference is logical and the two match in number (singular). Answers (C) and (D) also use this form.

Answers (B) and (E) switch to them. The plural them cannot refer to the singular elephant seal. Them could possibly refer to the plural eyes, but eyes don’t hunt efficiently; animals do. Eliminate (B) and (E).

Note that (E) has a second pronoun error: it allows them. What allows the elephant seal to hunt efficiently? The fact that its eyes adapt to darkness very quickly. A pronoun cannot refer to something that isn’t explicitly written in the sentence; there is no noun phrase in the sentence similar to the fact that… for the pronoun they to refer to. Adapt is a verb; a pronoun cannot refer to a verb.

The Correct Answer

Correct answer (C) compares the eyes of the elephant seal to those (the eyes) of any other animal yet tested. This choice also properly uses the singular pronoun it to refer to the singular noun elephant seal.


for those whose native language is not English, let me introduce this is an elephant seal ))))))
Attachments

elephant seal.jpg
elephant seal.jpg [ 42.56 KiB | Viewed 4893 times ]

   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts