The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it??to hunt efficiently under the gloomy conditions at its feeding depths of between 300 and 700 meters.
(A) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, thus allowing it
(B) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, allowing them
(C) The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, allowing it
(D) Because they adapt to darkness more quickly than any other animal yet tested, the eyes of the elephant seal allow it
(E) Because the eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than do those of any other animal yet tested, it allows them
hi team,??
in the above questions, option A states that -:
The eyes of the elephant seal adapt to darkness more quickly than [the eyes] any other animal yet tested.
my first question -:
1. why doesn't the elipses work in this case? 'the eyes' is already stated in the first part of the sentence and it can be considered in the second part.
2. according to one of the posts on
E-gmat, an example sentence was -:
" John cooks better piza than his wife"
the only intended/logical comparison could be between john and his wife and hence the comparison is correct.
similarly in the prompt, the only logical comparison could be between the eyes of the elephant and the eyes of any other animal.??
we can't logically compare the eyes of the elephant to any other animal.??
hence, to add "those of" makes it redundant.??
kindly validate my thinking process and let me know where i am going wrong.