It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 08:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Oct 2015
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 211

Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.93
WE: Account Management (Education)
GMAT ToolKit User
the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2016, 05:46
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

32% (00:47) correct 68% (01:12) wrong based on 199

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

60% (00:28) correct 40% (00:28) wrong based on 194

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

48% (00:38) correct 52% (00:21) wrong based on 189

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Question Stats:

67% (00:46) correct 33% (00:37) wrong based on 169

HideShow timer Statistics

The fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage for a company does not mean that every attempt at improving a product's quality will create such an advantage. Investments in product quality, like those in marketing and distribution, must be weighed against other types of investments with regard to direct, tangible benefits, such as increased profitability (including one or both of decreased costs and increased revenues) resulting from an investment. If a company is already competitive with others in the market in providing a product that is satisfactory to customers and avoids a negative reputation, then investment in increasing the quality of the product may be wasted because product quality, so long as it exceeds a minimum threshold, is rarely a primary factor for most customers in their buying decisions.

This concept was not understood by executives of one leading toy company, which failed to improve its competitive position, despite tremendous investment in strengthening the durability of its wooden toys. The toy company's executives did not recognize the leading role in which the brand names of their company and that of their primary competitors play in the buying decisions of their customers. As such, customers who are satisfied with a certain brand tend to remain loyal to that brand, despite changes in the quality of products made by that brand or any of its competitors. Similarly, they failed to analyze and properly understand the negative effects of an improvement in product quality, whereby their future purchases by customers loyal to their brand were actually cannibalized by the improved durability and extended lifespan of the newly improved toys. The only positive outcome of the improved product quality was the ability to easily market the toys to customers.
According to the passage, investments in product quality are comparable to investments in marketing and distribution in terms of their

A ability to measure the direct results they produce
B increased revenues they eventually produce
C manner in which they should be analyzed
D insufficient basis upon which executives research them
E level of competitive advantage they provide to a company


[Reveal] Spoiler:
C


The passage suggests which of the following about the quality of the product produced by the toy company prior to its investment in enhancing that product quality?

A. It enabled the toy company to satisfy customers at an acceptable rate.
B. It would likely weaken the toy company's competitive position with respect to other leading toy companies.
C. It had already been improved after it caused damage to the toy company's reputation in the past.
D. It was slightly better than that of the toy company's major competitors.
E. It needed to be improved to attain a similar level to that of the competing toy companies.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


This primary purpose of this passage is to

A. compare potential positive and negative outcomes of a type of business investment.
B. suggest greater due diligence into a type of business investment.
C. illustrate a variety of cases in which a type of business investment could fail to achieve greater revenue.
D. analyze the general problems of a company caused by a certain type of business investment.
E. criticize the manner in which managers tend to consider costs and benefits of business investments.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


The passage suggests that the toy company's executives failed to consider whether or not the product quality improvement

A. was overly complex to the point that it could not easily be described to potential customers in marketing materials.
B. would considerably improve the experience of the individuals who used the toy.
C. could be sustained if the number of toys manufactured was significantly increased.
D. could have an adverse effect on their sales.
E. was sufficient to raise the product quality to a level comparable with that of its competitors.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA

Last edited by Vyshak on 13 Jul 2016, 22:34, edited 4 times in total.
Formatting

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 211

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 271

Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2016, 06:31
1) a
2) b
3) b
4) d
please post Official answers
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 271

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Nov 2013
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2016, 21:14
Please provide the explanations to the answers.Thanks

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Nov 2013
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2016, 21:17
1.A
2.A
3.D
4.D

11 minutes and 20 seconds

Please provide the explanations to the answers :-D

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

Top Contributor
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 529

Kudos [?]: 670 [0], given: 606

Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2016, 04:39
Top Contributor
According to the passage, investments in product quality are comparable to investments in marketing and distribution in terms of their

A ability to measure the direct results they produce
B increased revenues they eventually produce
C manner in which they should be analyzed
Investments in product quality, like those in marketing and distribution, must be weighed against other types of investments with regard to
direct, tangible benefits, such as increased profitability ( including one or both of decreased costs and increased revenues) resulting from an investment

D insufficient basis upon which executives research them
E level of competitive advantage they provide to a company


The passage suggests which of the following about the quality of the product produced by the toy company prior to its investment in enhancing that product quality?
A. It enabled the toy company to satisfy customers at an acceptable rate.
>>If a company is already competitive with others in the market in providing a product that is satisfactory to customers and avoids a negative reputation
B. It would likely weaken the toy company's competitive position with respect to other leading toy companies.
C. It had already been improved after it caused damage to the toy company's reputation in the past.
D. It was slightly better than that of the toy company's major competitors.
E. It needed to be improved to attain a similar level to that of the competing toy companies.

This primary purpose of this passage is to
A. compare potential positive and negative outcomes of a type of business investment.
B. suggest greater due diligence into a type of business investment.
>>The fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage for a company does not mean that every attempt at improving a product's quality will create such an advantage. Investments in product quality, like those in marketing and distribution, must be weighed against other types of investments with regard to direct, tangible benefits, such as increased profitability (including one or both of decreased costs and increased revenues) resulting from an investment.
C. illustrate a variety of cases in which a type of business investment could fail to achieve greater revenue.
D. analyze the general problems of a company caused by a certain type of business investment.
E. criticize the manner in which managers tend to consider costs and benefits of business investments.

The passage suggests that the toy company's executives failed to consider whether or not the product quality improvement
A. was overly complex to the point that it could not easily be described to potential customers in marketing materials.
B. would considerably improve the experience of the individuals who used the toy.
C. could be sustained if the number of toys manufactured was significantly increased.
D. could have an adverse effect on their sales.
>>Similarly, they failed to analyze and properly understand the negative effects of an improvement in product quality,
E. was sufficient to raise the product quality to a level comparable with that of its competitors.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Kudos [?]: 670 [0], given: 606

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 30 Apr 2017
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 74

Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2017, 22:45
about question 4
the passage says that: The only positive outcome of the improved product quality was the ability to easily market the toys to customers.
so why answer d is correct?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 74

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 95 [1], given: 469

Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2017, 05:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
soodia wrote:
about question 4
the passage says that: The only positive outcome of the improved product quality was the ability to easily market the toys to customers.
so why answer d is correct?


The question asks what did the toy company's executives failed to understand?

Passage excerpt:
This concept was not understood by executives of one leading toy company, which failed to improve its competitive position, despite tremendous investment in strengthening the durability of its wooden toys. The toy company's executives did not recognize the leading role in which the brand names of their company and that of their primary competitors play in the buying decisions of their customers.

The highlighted portion suggests that their inability to understand the impact of product quality improvement had an adverse effect on their sales.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Kudos [?]: 95 [1], given: 469

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 469

Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2017, 05:39
Someone please explain Q1.

Thanks!
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 469

Re: the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage   [#permalink] 20 Nov 2017, 05:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

the fact that a superior product can generate a competitive advantage

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.