It is currently 16 Oct 2017, 21:19

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

Author Message
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 00:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 04:42
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Situation is deadlock when there are more than one nominee.

Kudos [?]: 108 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5208

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 04:58
Reads like an LSAT CR. Darn legal terminology confuses me every time. Anyway, there is a catch-22 in the wording.

(E)

2:23

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 18:58
E it is

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

12 Aug 2006, 20:14
no clue where can I get to practise such CRs ?
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

Show Tags

16 Aug 2006, 00:52
OA is E
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 0

16 Aug 2006, 00:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by