Last visit was: 13 May 2025, 13:01 It is currently 13 May 2025, 13:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Graphs|         
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
243
 [72]
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 271
Kudos: 243
 [72]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
66
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
TargetMBA007
Joined: 22 Nov 2019
Last visit: 21 Feb 2025
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
243
 [25]
Given Kudos: 216
Schools: Stanford (S)
GPA: 4.0
Schools: Stanford (S)
Posts: 271
Kudos: 243
 [25]
22
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 13 May 2025
Posts: 423
Own Kudos:
2,082
 [14]
Given Kudos: 206
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 423
Kudos: 2,082
 [14]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 338
Own Kudos:
556
 [3]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 338
Kudos: 556
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) France - Since it is having least variation in its values
2) Russia - Since if we consider the values of 1996 & 2000 and then draw the graph further accordingly then it will have the highest values in 2004, we can check the same for other countries but logic here is to check the values for the countries which are already at top points in the graph

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: -
Posts: 15,090
Own Kudos:
44,877
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,025
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,090
Kudos: 44,877
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The second statement is a bit trickier, it say that if the trend lines (as for 1996 to 2000) of the points of medals continues the greatest number of medal won by which country.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 852
Own Kudos:
593
 [3]
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 852
Kudos: 593
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The second basically asks to extrapolate the the data for 2004.
It is the language of the question that is very challenging.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
JoeAa
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 08 Apr 2024
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 46
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Didn't quite get it.. can someone explain Q2
User avatar
DongTan
Joined: 26 Feb 2022
Last visit: 20 Feb 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 21
Kudos: 22
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JoeAa
Didn't quite get it.. can someone explain Q2

I think the second question basically mean you have the data in 1996 and 2004, how can you predict the medal won in 2004.
User avatar
DhruvBadaya
Joined: 27 Feb 2024
Last visit: 01 May 2025
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Location: India
Posts: 64
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will explain the questions.

Question 1: Look for the graph will least changes from the four options. It's obviously France.

Question 2: Now, the question is asking what if I only had the graph until 2000 and no information after that. Using that, if the graph are ONLY straight lines and no bends, then can you predict the winner of 2004? The graph with the highest slope will be answer. (If you don't understand why, mention me and I will explain it in more detail)

Now, considering the four countries in the option. United States cannot be the answer since the graph is dipping. Comparing Australia and China, we know that Australia will be higher since its slope is higher. Comparing Australia and Russia, Russia's slope is higher and hence it is the answer.­
User avatar
Nikhil55
Joined: 27 Jul 2019
Last visit: 18 Aug 2024
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
8
 [4]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
Posts: 6
Kudos: 8
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Second question is quite vague, one could assume they want us to sum the medals won in 1996 and 2000 to determine the greatest medals won in 2004. Nowhere have they used words like projection, or expected, or estimated to imply that we have to assume the trend continues.
User avatar
D3N0
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 511
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
WE:Sales (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 511
Kudos: 446
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Similar thoughts. I was confused by the idea that if that point was on the line between these 2 years (not the extension of line) then who would get the higher points. Not sure why the question language was not a bit more clear. Even something like "continued", followed the trend, or extension on the same path" would have made it clearer to understand. Looks like comprehension is a big part in these questions now similar to CR and RCs. need to be careful here for a approx 2 min answer strategy
Nikhil55
Second question is quite vague, one could assume they want us to sum the medals won in 1996 and 2000 to determine the greatest medals won in 2004. Nowhere have they used words like projection, or expected, or estimated to imply that we have to assume the trend continues.
User avatar
ShubhadeepB
Joined: 30 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 May 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 22
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's decipher the second question. The exact wordings are "If, for each country, the point representing the medals won in 2004 had been on the line determined by the points representing the medals won in 1996 and 2000." The bold portion essentially screams at us to draw a line segment connecting the points representing the number of medals won in 1996 and 2000 for every country. As a next step, after extending the line segment maintaining the same slope, only Russia and Australia are the contenders for the greatest number of medals in 2004. Note that the slope for Australia is less than that for Russia. And so, Russia wins (literally and hypothetically)! Let me know in case you have questions.
User avatar
ShubhadeepB
Joined: 30 Apr 2020
Last visit: 06 May 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 22
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nikhil55, they have not. But the GMAC wants test takers to comprehend precisely what they are asking. And, if you literally deconstruct the language of this part of the second question, i.e., the point representing the medals won in 2004 had been on the line determined by the points representing the medals won in 1996 and 2000, you would first visualize drawing a line segment between the points representing the medals won in 1996 and 2000. That's a line segment. The next step is to extend the line to represent a point in 2004 maintaining the same slope. This is because the point representing the medals won in 2004 MUST be on that line. How can one assume that the number of medals won in 1996 and 2000 needs to be added?
Nikhil55
Second question is quite vague, one could assume they want us to sum the medals won in 1996 and 2000 to determine the greatest medals won in 2004. Nowhere have they used words like projection, or expected, or estimated to imply that we have to assume the trend continues.
Moderators:
Math Expert
101357 posts
GMAT Expert
11317 posts
DI Forum Moderator
688 posts