It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 20:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 330

Kudos [?]: 1054 [8], given: 136

The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2013, 07:22
8
KUDOS
71
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (01:19) correct 36% (01:47) wrong based on 968 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?

A. 100,000
B. 120,000
C. 160,000
D. 200,000
E. 320,000
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kudos [?]: 1054 [8], given: 136

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42338

Kudos [?]: 133161 [91], given: 12415

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2013, 07:52
91
KUDOS
Expert's post
59
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?

A. 100,000
B. 120,000
C. 160,000
D. 200,000
E. 320,000

The options are well spread so we can approximate.

Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters.

So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 133161 [91], given: 12415

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 330

Kudos [?]: 1054 [1], given: 136

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2013, 22:50
1
KUDOS
Hello Bunuel,
Sorry, but I dont understand the solution.
I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301) - (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kudos [?]: 1054 [1], given: 136

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42338

Kudos [?]: 133161 [3], given: 12415

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 01:24
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
Hello Bunuel,
Sorry, but I dont understand the solution.
I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301) - (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.

Posted from my mobile device

Yes, that's correct. But the way I suggested gives and approximate answer which is much easier to calculate than (201*201*301) - (200*200*300)= 160,701.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 133161 [3], given: 12415

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 330

Kudos [?]: 1054 [3], given: 136

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 05:32
3
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
Yes, that's correct. But the way I suggested gives and approximate answer which is much easier to calculate than (201*201*301) - (200*200*300)= 160,701.

Thanks Bunuel for the clarification. However, my solution assumes that the error of 1 cm would lead to increase in the dimensions of the boxes.
Can it be possible that the resultant volume would be bigger had I taken the values(200*200*300) - (199*199*299)?
I mean is there any number property that justifies that the difference would be always be bigger in the following case

If x<y<z , where x,y and z are positive numbers
then y-x< z-y .

according to this question, we can assume that :
x = (199*199*299)
y = (200*200*300)
z= (201*201*301)

Is it always treue -

(200*200*300) - (199*199*299) < (201*201*301) - (200*200*300)
_________________

+1 Kudos me, Help me unlocking GMAT Club Tests

Kudos [?]: 1054 [3], given: 136

Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 103 [2], given: 17

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2013, 23:26
2
KUDOS
I had the same doubt initially as well, but then I considered an easier problem and the relationship became clear; you can prove it to yourself by considering the behavior of the area of squares, and then extrapolate that result to cuboids. Consider the area of squares with sides 1, 2, and 3; the areas woukd be 1, 4, 9. As you increase the side by one unit, the /absolute/ difference becomes increasingly large (note, however, that the /percentage/ increase becomes increasingly small).

Algebraically, and letting the length of the side be x, you can represent this difference as (x + 1)^2 - x^2 = 2x + 1.

In other words, the difference is 1 greater than twice the initial length (x), ie, it is a function /of the initial length/.

You can extrapolate this result to n dimensions, including three.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 103 [2], given: 17

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42338

Kudos [?]: 133161 [3], given: 12415

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2013, 02:48
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
imhimanshu wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Yes, that's correct. But the way I suggested gives and approximate answer which is much easier to calculate than (201*201*301) - (200*200*300)= 160,701.

Thanks Bunuel for the clarification. However, my solution assumes that the error of 1 cm would lead to increase in the dimensions of the boxes.
Can it be possible that the resultant volume would be bigger had I taken the values(200*200*300) - (199*199*299)?
I mean is there any number property that justifies that the difference would be always be bigger in the following case

If x<y<z , where x,y and z are positive numbers
then y-x< z-y .

according to this question, we can assume that :
x = (199*199*299)
y = (200*200*300)
z= (201*201*301)

Is it always treue -

(200*200*300) - (199*199*299) < (201*201*301) - (200*200*300)

The red part is not always true:
Consider this: x=1, y=100, and z=101.

As for the other point:
Yes, (200*200*300) - (199*199*299) < (201*201*301) - (200*200*300) but $$(200*200*300) - (199*199*299) \approx{ (201*201*301) - (200*200*300)}$$, so you can get the answer no matter which case you consider.

My solution deals with this problem conceptually, to get approximate maximum difference, which allows to avoid calculation of (200*200*300) - (199*199*299) or (201*201*301) - (200*200*300).

Hope it helps.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 133161 [3], given: 12415

Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 47 [27], given: 4

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Oct 2013, 08:30
27
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I have done it using an alternative solution, Bunuel please correct me if my logic is wrong:

L: 200, 1cm is a deviation of 0,5%
W: 200, 1cm is a deviation of 0,5%
H: 300, 1cm is a deviation of 0,33%

Summing up the deviation percentages, we obtain a total maximum deviation of 1,33%.
Given that the volume 200*200*300 equals to 12,000,000 we can conclude that 1,33% of this number is around 160,000.

Thanks!

P.M.

Kudos [?]: 47 [27], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 36

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.6
WE: Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2013, 08:40
Bunuel wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?

A. 100,000
B. 120,000
C. 160,000
D. 200,000
E. 320,000

Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters.

So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters.

Great explanation Bunuel. K+1 from me.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 36

Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 11 [10], given: 119

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2013, 10:37
10
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Based on (a+b)^2 formula:

Calculated volume = 200 * 200 * 300 = 200 ^ 2 * 300

Actual volume = 201 * 201 * 301
= (200 + 1)^2 * (300 + 1)
= (200^2 + 1 + 400) * (300 + 1)
= 200^2 * 300 + 300 + 400 * 300 + 200^2 + 1 + 400

Actual volume - calculated volume = 300 + 120000+ 40000 + 1 + 400 = 160,701 ~ 160,000 (C)

Kudos [?]: 11 [10], given: 119

Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 58 [2], given: 41

Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: Haas
GMAT Date: 01-14-2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2014, 23:13
2
KUDOS
Consider X , Y , Z as original sides of the rectangular box .
Now X-1 , Y -1 , Z -1 or X + 1 , Y + 1 , Z + 1 are the new sides .

Difference in volume = ( X-1 ) ( Y - 1 ) ( Z - 1 ) - XYZ .
= XYZ + XY + YZ + ZX + 1 - X - Y - Z - XYZ .
= XY + YZ + ZX + 1 - ( X + Y + Z )
= 200*200 + 200 * 300 + 200 * 300 + 1 - ( 200 + 300 + 200 )
= 160001 - 700
= 159301
Hence C . or 16701 if taken otherwise

Kudos [?]: 58 [2], given: 41

Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 174

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2014, 13:35
Bunuel, can you please suggest some problems of this type, if any?

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 174

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42338

Kudos [?]: 133161 [7], given: 12415

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2014, 00:56
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 133161 [7], given: 12415

Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2015, 05:11
For those of you familiar with derivatives from calculus can use it to arrive at the same conclusion as Bunuel stated at the beginning.
Lets assume the following for the rectangular box,
length(l) = 200, breadth(b) = 200, height(h) = 300

Since Volume (V) = lxbxh,
taking its derivative we get the following,

dV = bxhxdl + lxhxdb + lxbxdh (here dl, db,dh refers to the difference in measurement of the length, breadth and height)

Hence, dV (which is the difference in the volume) = 200x300x1 + 200x300x1 + 200x200x1 = 160000

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 10 May 2014
Posts: 142

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 28

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2016, 09:15
Bunuel wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?

A. 100,000
B. 120,000
C. 160,000
D. 200,000
E. 320,000

The options are well spread so we can approximate.

Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters.

So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters.

Hi Bunuel,

Thanks for this explanation. I had set an algebraic approach and I wanted to take out common factor but at some point I didn´t know how to go on.

Algebraic approach
(301) (201) (201) - (300) (200) (200)
(200 + 101) (200 + 1) (200 + 1) - (200 + 100) (200) (200)

I know that the 200 of both the computed capacity and the actual capacity can be factored out, but I don´t know how to go on.

Thank you so much,
_________________

Consider giving me Kudos if I helped, but don´t take them away if I didn´t!

What would you do if you weren´t afraid?

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 28

Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 82

Location: United States
Schools: HBS '18
GPA: 3.9
Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2016, 12:00
Bunuel , Any similar questions on CUBE ?

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 82

Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2013
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 17

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 570 Q45 V24
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.36
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2016, 07:19
Hi there,

The questions states that there is a 1 cm error to each of the measurements.

So can we assume that the error is +-1cm?

Thanks,

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 17

Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 14

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2017, 04:32
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
imhimanshu wrote:
Hello Bunuel,
Sorry, but I dont understand the solution.
I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301) - (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.

Posted from my mobile device

Hello All,
I still have a doubt here. The error can be atmost 1 cm i.e +- 1cm .
Therefore to maximize the difference between the Actual and the faulty volume can be (201 x 201 x 301) - (199 x 199 x 299).
Then why in the above post have we assumed the (200 x 200 x 300), when we can further maximize the difference and get the value. Unfortunately this is not yielding the correct answer either.

Regards.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 14

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42338

Kudos [?]: 133161 [0], given: 12415

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2017, 04:47
grsm wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
Hello Bunuel,
Sorry, but I dont understand the solution.
I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301) - (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.

Posted from my mobile device

Hello All,
I still have a doubt here. The error can be atmost 1 cm i.e +- 1cm .
Therefore to maximize the difference between the Actual and the faulty volume can be (201 x 201 x 301) - (199 x 199 x 299).
Then why in the above post have we assumed the (200 x 200 x 300), when we can further maximize the difference and get the value. Unfortunately this is not yielding the correct answer either.

Regards.

Check this: http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-measureme ... l#p1270826
_________________

Kudos [?]: 133161 [0], given: 12415

VP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1285

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 165

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2017, 09:36
Bunuel wrote:
imhimanshu wrote:
The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?

A. 100,000
B. 120,000
C. 160,000
D. 200,000
E. 320,000

The options are well spread so we can approximate.

Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters;
Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters.

So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters.

is not it kind of overlapping? each dimension is included in 2 of the 3 products above.

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 165

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a   [#permalink] 22 Jan 2017, 09:36

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 31 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by