May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. May 27 01:00 AM PDT  11:59 PM PDT All GMAT Club Tests are free and open on May 27th for Memorial Day! May 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Special savings are here for Magoosh GMAT Prep! Even better  save 20% on the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 5/27 May 30 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Application deadlines are just around the corner, so now’s the time to start studying for the GMAT! Start today and save 25% on your GMAT prep. Valid until May 30th.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 256

The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2013, 07:22
Question Stats:
61% (02:19) correct 39% (02:39) wrong based on 807 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements? A. 100,000 B. 120,000 C. 160,000 D. 200,000 E. 320,000
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55266

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2013, 07:52
imhimanshu wrote: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?
A. 100,000 B. 120,000 C. 160,000 D. 200,000 E. 320,000 The options are well spread so we can approximate. Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters. So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters. Answer: C.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 6

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Oct 2013, 08:30
I have done it using an alternative solution, Bunuel please correct me if my logic is wrong:
L: 200, 1cm is a deviation of 0,5% W: 200, 1cm is a deviation of 0,5% H: 300, 1cm is a deviation of 0,33%
Summing up the deviation percentages, we obtain a total maximum deviation of 1,33%. Given that the volume 200*200*300 equals to 12,000,000 we can conclude that 1,33% of this number is around 160,000.
Thanks!
P.M.




Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 256

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2013, 22:50
Hello Bunuel, Sorry, but I dont understand the solution. I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301)  (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.
Posted from my mobile device



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55266

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 01:24
imhimanshu wrote: Hello Bunuel, Sorry, but I dont understand the solution. I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301)  (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.
Posted from my mobile device Yes, that's correct. But the way I suggested gives and approximate answer which is much easier to calculate than (201*201*301)  (200*200*300)= 160,701.
_________________



Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 256

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 05:32
Bunuel wrote: Yes, that's correct. But the way I suggested gives and approximate answer which is much easier to calculate than (201*201*301)  (200*200*300)= 160,701. Thanks Bunuel for the clarification. However, my solution assumes that the error of 1 cm would lead to increase in the dimensions of the boxes. Can it be possible that the resultant volume would be bigger had I taken the values(200*200*300)  (199*199*299)? I mean is there any number property that justifies that the difference would be always be bigger in the following case If x<y<z , where x,y and z are positive numbers then yx< zy . according to this question, we can assume that : x = (199*199*299) y = (200*200*300) z= (201*201*301) Is it always treue  (200*200*300)  (199*199*299) < (201*201*301)  (200*200*300) Please clarify.



Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 21

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2013, 23:26
I had the same doubt initially as well, but then I considered an easier problem and the relationship became clear; you can prove it to yourself by considering the behavior of the area of squares, and then extrapolate that result to cuboids. Consider the area of squares with sides 1, 2, and 3; the areas woukd be 1, 4, 9. As you increase the side by one unit, the /absolute/ difference becomes increasingly large (note, however, that the /percentage/ increase becomes increasingly small).
Algebraically, and letting the length of the side be x, you can represent this difference as (x + 1)^2  x^2 = 2x + 1.
In other words, the difference is 1 greater than twice the initial length (x), ie, it is a function /of the initial length/.
You can extrapolate this result to n dimensions, including three.
Posted from my mobile device



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55266

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2013, 02:48
imhimanshu wrote: Bunuel wrote: Yes, that's correct. But the way I suggested gives and approximate answer which is much easier to calculate than (201*201*301)  (200*200*300)= 160,701. Thanks Bunuel for the clarification. However, my solution assumes that the error of 1 cm would lead to increase in the dimensions of the boxes. Can it be possible that the resultant volume would be bigger had I taken the values(200*200*300)  (199*199*299)? I mean is there any number property that justifies that the difference would be always be bigger in the following case If x<y<z , where x,y and z are positive numbers then yx< zy .according to this question, we can assume that : x = (199*199*299) y = (200*200*300) z= (201*201*301) Is it always treue  (200*200*300)  (199*199*299) < (201*201*301)  (200*200*300) Please clarify. The red part is not always true: Consider this: x=1, y=100, and z=101. As for the other point: Yes, (200*200*300)  (199*199*299) < (201*201*301)  (200*200*300) but \((200*200*300)  (199*199*299) \approx{ (201*201*301)  (200*200*300)}\), so you can get the answer no matter which case you consider. My solution deals with this problem conceptually, to get approximate maximum difference, which allows to avoid calculation of (200*200*300)  (199*199*299) or (201*201*301)  (200*200*300). Hope it helps.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GPA: 3.6
WE: Business Development (Energy and Utilities)

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Nov 2013, 08:40
Bunuel wrote: imhimanshu wrote: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?
A. 100,000 B. 120,000 C. 160,000 D. 200,000 E. 320,000 Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters. So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters. Answer: C. Great explanation Bunuel. K+1 from me.



Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 2

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Nov 2013, 10:37
Based on (a+b)^2 formula:
Calculated volume = 200 * 200 * 300 = 200 ^ 2 * 300
Actual volume = 201 * 201 * 301 = (200 + 1)^2 * (300 + 1) = (200^2 + 1 + 400) * (300 + 1) = 200^2 * 300 + 300 + 400 * 300 + 200^2 + 1 + 400
Actual volume  calculated volume = 300 + 120000+ 40000 + 1 + 400 = 160,701 ~ 160,000 (C)



Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 132
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT Date: 01142015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Sep 2014, 23:13
Consider X , Y , Z as original sides of the rectangular box . Now X1 , Y 1 , Z 1 or X + 1 , Y + 1 , Z + 1 are the new sides .
Difference in volume = ( X1 ) ( Y  1 ) ( Z  1 )  XYZ . = XYZ + XY + YZ + ZX + 1  X  Y  Z  XYZ . = XY + YZ + ZX + 1  ( X + Y + Z ) = 200*200 + 200 * 300 + 200 * 300 + 1  ( 200 + 300 + 200 ) = 160001  700 = 159301 Hence C . or 16701 if taken otherwise



Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27 GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2014, 13:35
Bunuel, can you please suggest some problems of this type, if any?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55266

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2014, 00:56



Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 1

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jul 2015, 05:11
For those of you familiar with derivatives from calculus can use it to arrive at the same conclusion as Bunuel stated at the beginning. Lets assume the following for the rectangular box, length(l) = 200, breadth(b) = 200, height(h) = 300
Since Volume (V) = lxbxh, taking its derivative we get the following,
dV = bxhxdl + lxhxdb + lxbxdh (here dl, db,dh refers to the difference in measurement of the length, breadth and height)
Hence, dV (which is the difference in the volume) = 200x300x1 + 200x300x1 + 200x200x1 = 160000
Answer : C



Manager
Joined: 10 May 2014
Posts: 138

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jan 2016, 09:15
Bunuel wrote: imhimanshu wrote: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?
A. 100,000 B. 120,000 C. 160,000 D. 200,000 E. 320,000 The options are well spread so we can approximate. Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters. So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters. Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, Thanks for this explanation. I had set an algebraic approach and I wanted to take out common factor but at some point I didn´t know how to go on. Algebraic approach (301) (201) (201)  (300) (200) (200) (200 + 101) (200 + 1) (200 + 1)  (200 + 100) (200) (200) I know that the 200 of both the computed capacity and the actual capacity can be factored out, but I don´t know how to go on. Would you please help here? I know that this can be helpful for other similar questions. Thank you so much,
_________________
Consider giving me Kudos if I helped, but don´t take them away if I didn´t! What would you do if you weren´t afraid?



Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.9

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 May 2016, 12:00
Bunuel , Any similar questions on CUBE ?
Thanks



Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2013
Posts: 22
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 570 Q45 V24 GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.36
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2016, 07:19
Hi there,
The questions states that there is a 1 cm error to each of the measurements.
So can we assume that the error is +1cm?
So the answer is 201*201*301199*199*299?
Thanks,



Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 24

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2017, 04:32
imhimanshu wrote: Hello Bunuel, Sorry, but I dont understand the solution. I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301)  (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.
Posted from my mobile device Hello All, I still have a doubt here. The error can be atmost 1 cm i.e + 1cm . Therefore to maximize the difference between the Actual and the faulty volume can be (201 x 201 x 301)  (199 x 199 x 299). Then why in the above post have we assumed the (200 x 200 x 300), when we can further maximize the difference and get the value. Unfortunately this is not yielding the correct answer either. Thus, Can someone please help out. Regards.
_________________
 Mega collection of All RCs from GMAT, GRE & LSAT https://gmatclub.com/forum/megarccollectionfromgmatgrelsat273512.htmlMega collection of CRs from various sources (including LSAT) https://gmatclub.com/forum/megacriticalreasoningcrcollection274044.html



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55266

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2017, 04:47
grsm wrote: imhimanshu wrote: Hello Bunuel, Sorry, but I dont understand the solution. I thought,since it is given that the dimensions have at most an error of 1 cm. So maximum possible difference in volume would be: (201* 201 * 301)  (200 *200*300). Pls suggest what i am doing wrong.
Posted from my mobile device Hello All, I still have a doubt here. The error can be atmost 1 cm i.e + 1cm . Therefore to maximize the difference between the Actual and the faulty volume can be (201 x 201 x 301)  (199 x 199 x 299). Then why in the above post have we assumed the (200 x 200 x 300), when we can further maximize the difference and get the value. Unfortunately this is not yielding the correct answer either. Thus, Can someone please help out. Regards. Check this: http://gmatclub.com/forum/themeasureme ... l#p1270826
_________________



SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2176

Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jan 2017, 09:36
Bunuel wrote: imhimanshu wrote: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a rectangular box are 200 cm by 200 cm by 300cm. If each of the three measurements has an error of at most 1 centimeter, which of the following is the closes maximum possible difference, in cubic centimeters, between the actual capacity of the box and the capacity computed using these measurements?
A. 100,000 B. 120,000 C. 160,000 D. 200,000 E. 320,000 The options are well spread so we can approximate. Changing the length by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 1*200*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the width by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*1*300 = 60,000 cubic centimeters; Changing the height by 1 cm results in change of the volume by 200*200*1 = 40,000 cubic centimeters. So, approximate maximum possible difference is 60,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = 160,000 cubic centimeters. Answer: C. is not it kind of overlapping? each dimension is included in 2 of the 3 products above. Can you clarify please?




Re: The measurements obtained for the interior dimensions of a
[#permalink]
22 Jan 2017, 09:36



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 36 posts ]



