Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 23:43 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 23:43

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jan 2016
Posts: 158
Own Kudos [?]: 111 [20]
Given Kudos: 421
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V32
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q42 V39
GPA: 3.48
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jan 2016
Posts: 158
Own Kudos [?]: 111 [1]
Given Kudos: 421
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V32
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q42 V39
GPA: 3.48
Send PM
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 04 Jan 2016
Posts: 158
Own Kudos [?]: 111 [1]
Given Kudos: 421
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V32
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q42 V39
GPA: 3.48
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Thank you very much.

Of course, tired eyes of mine and exhausted brain couldn't realize it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 450
Own Kudos [?]: 393 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hi sayantanc2k, Can you please tell me when to use increase of and when to use Increase in.
Sorry, This might sound basic.
Here, in the above question i chose C rather than choosing E.
Thank you.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 354
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [0]
Given Kudos: 150
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.85
WE:Design (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
Has option C been ruled out because it's unidiomatic? Can you elaborate on 'increase in' vs 'increase of', and explain why 'increase of' is correct here? TIA.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2017
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
Heseraj wrote:
The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008, nearly double as much as the previous four years.

(A) double as much as
(B) double
(C) doubling the increase in
(D) twice that of
(E) doubling the increase of

Question GMAT Experts:
Can the increase of in option E be compared to the verb rose in the original sentence?

Appreciate your explanation.



Stuck between C and E. Would anyone please explain the difference between increase of and increase in? :roll:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 148 [0]
Given Kudos: 242
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Send PM
The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
Please explain why the increase in in C is wrong, but the increase of in E is right!

Many thanks!
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Nightmare007 wrote:
Hi sayantanc2k, Can you please tell me when to use increase of and when to use Increase in.
Sorry, This might sound basic.
Here, in the above question i chose C rather than choosing E.
Thank you.

leanhdung wrote:
Please explain why the increase in in C is wrong, but the increase of in E is right!

Many thanks!

DigitsnLetters wrote:
Has option C been ruled out because it's unidiomatic? Can you elaborate on 'increase in' vs 'increase of', and explain why 'increase of' is correct here? TIA.

umabharatigudipalli wrote:
Heseraj wrote:
The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008, nearly double as much as the previous four years.

(A) double as much as
(B) double
(C) doubling the increase in
(D) twice that of
(E) doubling the increase of

Question GMAT Experts:
Can the increase of in option E be compared to the verb rose in the original sentence?

Appreciate your explanation.


Take a hypothetical case:
Value at year 1 beginning = 100
Increase in year 1 = 10
Value at year 2 beginning = 110
Increase in year 2 = 12
Value at year 3 beginning = 122
Increase in year 3 = 14
Value at year 4 beginning = 136
Increase in year 4 = 16
Value at year 5 (current) beginning = 152[/u]
Increase in year 5 (current) = ??

Case I: Doubling the increase IN last 4 years --->
Meaning 1: The "increase" doubled IN last four years ("IN" is an adverb for the verb "double"). The increase was 10 four years ago. Thus this year the increase is 10 x 2 = 20. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 20 = 172.
Meaning 2: The "increase" IN last four years doubled ("IN last four years" is a prepositional phrase modifier for the noun "increase"). The increase IN last 4 years was = 10+12+14+16 = 52. Thus this year the increase is 52 x 2 = 104. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 104 = 256.
Thus there is an ambiguity in meaning if one uses "IN" (the increase could be 20 or 104 - not clear).

Case II: Doubling the increase OF last 4 years ---> The "increase" OF last four years doubled ("OF last four years" is a prepositional phrase modifier for the noun "increase"). The increase OF last four years is 10+12+14+16 = 52. Thus this year the increase is 52 x 2 = 104. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 104 = 256.
There is no ambuity in meaning. ("The increase doubled OF last four years" does not make sense.)

Hence OF is better than IN in this case.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2014
Posts: 354
Own Kudos [?]: 171 [0]
Given Kudos: 150
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.85
WE:Design (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
Take a hypothetical case:
Value at year 1 beginning = 100
Increase in year 1 = 10
Value at year 2 beginning = 110
Increase in year 2 = 12
Value at year 3 beginning = 122
Increase in year 3 = 14
Value at year 4 beginning = 136
Increase in year 4 = 16
Value at year 5 (current) beginning = 152[/u]
Increase in year 5 (current) = ??

Case I: Doubling the increase IN last 4 years --->
Meaning 1: The "increase" doubled IN last four years ("IN" is an adverb for the verb "double"). The increase was 10 four years ago. Thus this year the increase is 10 x 2 = 20. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 20 = 172.
Meaning 2: The "increase" IN last four years doubled ("IN last four years" is a prepositional phrase modifier for the noun "increase"). The increase IN last 4 years was = 10+12+14+16 = 52. Thus this year the increase is 52 x 2 = 104. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 104 = 256.
Thus there is an ambiguity in meaning if one uses "IN" (the increase could be 20 or 104 - not clear).

Case II: Doubling the increase OF last 4 years ---> The "increase" OF last four years doubled ("OF last four years" is a prepositional phrase modifier for the noun "increase"). The increase OF last four years is 10+12+14+16 = 52. Thus this year the increase is 52 x 2 = 104. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 104 = 256.
There is no ambuity in meaning. ("The increase doubled OF last four years" does not make sense.)

Hence OF is better than IN in this case.

I don't feel there is any ambiguity if we use 'doubling the increase in'.

Here's the statement: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008, nearly doubling the increase in the previous four years.

The above statement clearly says that the increase in the previous four years has nearly doubled. Thus, national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between years 2004 and 2008, nearly doubling the increase in the past four years, i.e. if the increase in last four years, 2000-2004, was X (say), then the increase between 2004-2008 would be 2X!

Per your explanation, Case I: Doubling the increase IN last 4 years --->
Meaning 1: The "increase" doubled IN last four years ("IN" is an adverb for the verb "double"). The increase was 10 four years ago. Thus this year the increase is 10 x 2 = 20. Thus value at year end 5 = 152 + 20 = 172.

I feel there is an error here. Why are we only considering one particular year? The prompt specifically mentions 'last four years' and not 'fourth last year'. Isn't is error-some to consider just 10 and not 52 instead? The meaning-2 is the only meaning that can be correctly inferred out of the given statement. Hence, 'doubling the increase in' should be correct.

Is my understanding correct? Or, am I missing some key point here?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
ANS D)

Replacing "double as much as" with Twice that of is more concise and grammatical.

Also Twice that of previous four year correctly compares the profit between 2004-2008 and profit four years before that.



Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
E is the only option that correctly refers to the increase that happened in the last four years.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2018
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 195
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
Why D could not be the OA?

'Twice that of' makes complete sense. Please explain.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17208
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The national debt per U.S. citizen rose sharply between 2004 and 2008 [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne