GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 15:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The Norwegian government started legal action recently

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Posts: 7
Location: Australia
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 12 May 2018, 12:07
4
7
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:07) correct 43% (01:07) wrong based on 701 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Norwegian government started legal action recently to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it could ensnare countries outside the Eurozone that do not adopt the law.

1) to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

2) to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax; the tax could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

3) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone, which do not adopt the law

4) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax on the grounds that it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

5) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax due to the fact that it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

Confused between b & d

Originally posted by hharpreet on 12 Jan 2015, 13:36.
Last edited by Bunuel on 12 May 2018, 12:07, edited 4 times in total.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3434
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2015, 15:41

Regards
_________________
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2015, 12:11
Please check my method and correct me if I am wrong:

Option A and B are eliminated because of the phrase- "Try and Block". "Try to Block" is idiomatically correct.

Option C and E state that the law WILL ensnare countries outside the Eurozone whereas the question states that it "Coult"

Which leaves us with C
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2014
Posts: 31
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2015, 12:11
Please check my method and correct me if I am wrong:

Option A and B are eliminated because of the phrase- "Try and Block". "Try to Block" is idiomatically correct.

Option C and E state that the law WILL ensnare countries outside the Eurozone whereas the question states that it "Coult"

Which leaves us with D*
Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Posts: 8
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2015, 02:51
1
The Norwegian government started legal action recently to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it could ensnare countries outside the Eurozone that do not adopt the law.

A) to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

B) to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax; the tax could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

C) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone, which do not adopt the law

D) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax on the grounds that it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

E) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax due to the fact that it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

->"to try to block" is the correct idiom, A & B are out
-> Which in option C refers to the Euro zone, hence wrong, C out
-> "on the grounds that it COULD" is preferred to "due to the fact that it WILL"

OA is D
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 232
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2015, 05:11
Although I picked the right answer, I am bit confused in regard to the intended meaning of the sentence.....

"that do not adopt the law" ---> is it the Euro Zone 'that do not adopt the law' or the countries 'that do not adopt the law'?

Can someone please share his/her thoughts on the same?

Thanks
Current Student
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 43
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2015, 14:55
1
DesiGmat wrote:
Although I picked the right answer, I am bit confused in regard to the intended meaning of the sentence.....

"that do not adopt the law" ---> is it the Euro Zone 'that do not adopt the law' or the countries 'that do not adopt the law'?

Can someone please share his/her thoughts on the same?

Thanks

Hi,

The intended meaning is the countries "that do not adopt the law" and these countries lie outside the Euro Zone.

In regards to which is correct - "to try and block" or "to try to block", lets check the meaning. Here the Norwegian government wants to stop the RH Tax. So they are going to do one action : try blocking it, where they may or may not succeed. They are not doing 2 different actions of 1st "Trying" and then a 2nd separate action of "Blocking". I.e. the "Try" leads to "Block" if successful and we should not use "and". So it should not be "To Try and Block" as correct form is - "To Try to Block". Hope I was able to clarify this.
_________________

--------

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 379
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2015, 02:46
Hi guys!
I have a question about C. Is it correct to say that "outside Euro zone" modifies "countries" and hence we can use "which" after modifier?. I read about this possibility in SC guide. Please clarify. Thanks!
_________________

"Are you gangsters?" - "No we are Russians!"

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4523
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2015, 05:34
1
C) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone, which do not adopt the law -----1. ‘Because it will ensnare’ seems too strongly worded. 2. Which certainly refers to the countries; Note that the verb is plural and it does not refer to the Zone, which is singular. So C is passable.

D to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax on the grounds that it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law--- Could ensnare is fine, definitely acceptable at the start of the campaign;2. However, the ‘that’ in Euro Zone is a restrictive pronoun, therefore must refer to the Euro Zone ; There is no elbow-room for the restrictive pronouns to modify any noun other than what is in the front. So all choices that say “ Euro-zone that” are inherently flawed. This leaves only C, I suppose

That is the reason C is better than D.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2015
Posts: 57
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 06 Aug 2015, 06:50
Hi daagh, my reasoning is exactly same as yours, 'which' can jump over and refer 'countries' but 'that' can only refer to the previous noun 'euro zone' but the OA is given as D.

So is our reasoning wrong or is there some other split that we are not aware of ?

Originally posted by Swaroopdev on 04 Aug 2015, 23:03.
Last edited by Swaroopdev on 06 Aug 2015, 06:50, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4523
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2015, 01:59
I am not aware of any other split that justifies "Euro Zone that"; The original poster might fetch the OE, if possible.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 533
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2017, 04:47
daagh wrote:
....2. However, the ‘that’ in Euro Zone is a restrictive pronoun, therefore must refer to the Euro Zone ; There is no elbow-room for the restrictive pronouns to modify any noun other than what is in the front...
Hi daagh Sir,

Would you please shed light on the following?

If restricted pronoun 'that' cannot modify any noun other than what is in the front, how in the following correct sentence 'that' modifies 70,000 icy objects instead of Kuiper Belt?

Pluto is now categorized as just one out of 70,000 icy objects in the Kuiper Belt that measure 100 kilometers across or more. Truncated from https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-brand-new- ... 72543.html
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 517
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2017, 04:59
1
Mahmud6 wrote:
daagh wrote:
....2. However, the ‘that’ in Euro Zone is a restrictive pronoun, therefore must refer to the Euro Zone ; There is no elbow-room for the restrictive pronouns to modify any noun other than what is in the front...
Hi daagh Sir,

Would you please shed light on the following?

If restricted pronoun 'that' cannot modify any noun other than what is in the front, how in the following correct sentence 'that' modifies 70,000 icy objects instead of Kuiper Belt?

Pluto is now categorized as just one out of 70,000 icy objects in the Kuiper Belt that measure 100 kilometers across or more. Truncated from https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-brand-new- ... 72543.html

Hello,

I am ofcourse no daagh sir. But thought of presenting my take on this one.
'that' correctly modifies the Kuiper Belt. Had it been modifying icy objects, the meaning would have been absurd, suggesting that the icy objects measure 100 kilometers ....

Hope it helps
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq

Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 533
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2017, 05:11
TaN1213 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
daagh wrote:
....2. However, the ‘that’ in Euro Zone is a restrictive pronoun, therefore must refer to the Euro Zone ; There is no elbow-room for the restrictive pronouns to modify any noun other than what is in the front...
Hi daagh Sir,

Would you please shed light on the following?

If restricted pronoun 'that' cannot modify any noun other than what is in the front, how in the following correct sentence 'that' modifies 70,000 icy objects instead of Kuiper Belt?

Pluto is now categorized as just one out of 70,000 icy objects in the Kuiper Belt that measure 100 kilometers across or more. Truncated from https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-brand-new- ... 72543.html

Hello,

I am ofcourse no daagh sir. But thought of presenting my take on this one.
'that' correctly modifies the Kuiper Belt. Had it been modifying icy objects, the meaning would have been absurd, suggesting that the icy objects measure 100 kilometers ....

Hope it helps

TaN1213

Have you seen the link I mentioned with the post? In the link 'that' correctly modifies the icy objects NOT the Kuiper Belt.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 517
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2017, 05:17
Mahmud6 wrote:
TaN1213 wrote:

Hello,

I am ofcourse no daagh sir. But thought of presenting my take on this one.
'that' correctly modifies the Kuiper Belt. Had it been modifying icy objects, the meaning would have been absurd, suggesting that the icy objects measure 100 kilometers ....

Hope it helps

TaN1213

Have you seen the link I mentioned with the post? In the link 'that' correctly modifies the icy objects NOT the Kuiper Belt.

B). Discovered in 1930 and once considered the ninth planet in the solar system, Pluto lost its planetary status in 2006, a development that prompted the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to create a new definition for the term ‘planet’, and is now categorized as just one out of 70,000 icy objects in the Kuiper Belt that measure .

As you have already mentioned - "If restricted pronoun 'that' cannot modify any noun other than what is in the front" , 'that' correctly modifies the belt.

Let me know if you feel I am missing something.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq

Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 533
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2017, 05:26
TaN1213 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:
TaN1213 wrote:

Hello,

I am ofcourse no daagh sir. But thought of presenting my take on this one.
'that' correctly modifies the Kuiper Belt. Had it been modifying icy objects, the meaning would have been absurd, suggesting that the icy objects measure 100 kilometers ....

Hope it helps

TaN1213

Have you seen the link I mentioned with the post? In the link 'that' correctly modifies the icy objects NOT the Kuiper Belt.

B). Discovered in 1930 and once considered the ninth planet in the solar system, Pluto lost its planetary status in 2006, a development that prompted the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to create a new definition for the term ‘planet’, and is now categorized as just one out of 70,000 icy objects in the Kuiper Belt that measure .

As you have already mentioned - "If restricted pronoun 'that' cannot modify any noun other than what is in the front" , 'that' correctly modifies the belt.

Let me know if you feel I am missing something.

If 'that' had correctly modified the Kuiper Belt, than it would have been 'measures' Not 'measure'.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 517
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2017, 06:42
Mahmud6 wrote:
TaN1213 wrote:
Mahmud6 wrote:

TaN1213

Have you seen the link I mentioned with the post? In the link 'that' correctly modifies the icy objects NOT the Kuiper Belt.

B). Discovered in 1930 and once considered the ninth planet in the solar system, Pluto lost its planetary status in 2006, a development that prompted the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to create a new definition for the term ‘planet’, and is now categorized as just one out of 70,000 icy objects in the Kuiper Belt that measure .

As you have already mentioned - "If restricted pronoun 'that' cannot modify any noun other than what is in the front" , 'that' correctly modifies the belt.

Let me know if you feel I am missing something.

If 'that' had correctly modified the Kuiper Belt, than it would have been 'measures' Not 'measure'.

I see. Need to be careful. Thanks
Now I too await Daagh sir's reply on this one.
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 230
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2018, 01:35
I found a long discussion on whether that can refer back to far away noun or not.Well the answer is YES IT CAN but only if that modification makes sense .

There is a nicely written article by egmat on the topic and an entire chapter dedicated in the mgmat SC guide.

I'm posting an official gmatprep question in which that has refereed back to a far away noun.

For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.

(A) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

(B) devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere have been decimated

(C) devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere that have been decimated

(D) devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated

(E) the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2017
Posts: 55
Location: India
Schools: SMU '19 (A), LBS
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.3
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2018, 07:19
hharpreet wrote:
The Norwegian government started legal action recently to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it could ensnare countries outside the Eurozone that do not adopt the law.

1) to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

2) to try and block the so-called Robin Hood tax; the tax could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

3) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax because it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone, which do not adopt the law

4) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax on the grounds that it could ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

5) to try to block the so-called Robin Hood tax due to the fact that it will ensnare countries outside the Euro Zone that do not adopt the law

Confused between b & d

Can somebody post official solution by Veritas Prep as it will help to better analyze errors.
Re: The Norwegian government started legal action recently &nbs [#permalink] 12 May 2018, 07:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.