Last visit was: 17 May 2026, 18:15 It is currently 17 May 2026, 18:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 (Hard)|   Conclusion|            
User avatar
peanuts
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 29 May 2021
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Hovkial
Joined: 23 Apr 2019
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 202
Status:PhD trained. Education research, management.
Posts: 802
Kudos: 2,619
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bluebao102
Joined: 22 Oct 2024
Last visit: 17 May 2026
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 11 May 2026
Posts: 5,631
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,631
Kudos: 33,458
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question! Your reasoning would be valid — except for one word you missed.

The Key Phrase:
> "During this period, when United States percentage was STEADILY DECREASING..."

"Steadily decreasing" ≠ "decreased"

| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| "Decreased" | Went down (could fluctuate) |
| "Steadily decreased" | Went down consistently, no reversals |

Your Hypothetical:
1964: 3.0% → 1970: 1.5% → 1978: 2.2%

This requires an INCREASE from 1970 to 1978 — which directly contradicts "steadily decreasing".

What the Passage Actually Allows:
- US: Straight decline from 3.0%2.2% (never below 2.2%)
- Japan: Increased TO 1.6% (meaning 1.6% is the endpoint, was lower before)

The Math:
US minimum during period = 2.2%
Japan maximum during period = 1.6%

2.2% > 1.6% → US was always higher than Japan ✓

Bottom Line:
The word "steadily" eliminates your hypothetical scenario. If US was steadily decreasing, it couldn't have dipped to 1.5% and risen back — that would require an increase, breaking the steady decline.

Answer: (D)

bluebao102
Greetings Karishma,

The statement "From 1964 to 1978, US decreased its % of GNP spending on R & D from 3% to 2.2%." Does not specify 2.2% as being the lowest % of GNP spending in the range of the given years. Can we fairly assume that the US consistently, YoY, had a larger % of GNP allocated to RnD when we are not explicitly told 2.2% is the lowest this percentage has been?

Assuming that RND as a % of GNP dropped to 1.5% in 1970 for instance, before rising back to 2.2% in 1978 would not conflict with the excerpt.

Please let me know if there is a fault in my reasoning. Looking forward to your response!


User avatar
sriramsundaram91
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Last visit: 14 May 2026
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 81
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You have been caught out because you noticed that the reduction was 3% to 2.2% but failed to notice that "during this period ('64 - '78), US precentage was steadily decreasing" and Japan's was at 1.6%.

Steady decrease from 3% to 2.2% i.e. there aren't points below 2.2%, which is > than 1.6% so D.

tuanquang269
The number of patents granted to inventors by the United States Patent Office dropped from 56000 in 1971 to 45000 in 1978. Spending on research and development, which peaked at 3 percent of the gross national product (GNP) in 1964, was only 2.2 percent of the GNP in 1978. During this period, when United States percentage was steadily decreasing, West Germany and Japan increased the percentage of their GNP’s spent on research and development to 3.2 percent and 1.6 percent, respectively.

Which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information above?

(A) There is direct relationship between the size of a nation’s GNP and the number of inventions it produces.

(B) Japan and Germany spent more money on research and development in 1978 than did the United States.

(C) The amount of money a nation spends on research and development is directly related to the number of inventions patented in that nation.

(D) Between 1964 and 1978 the United States consistently spent a larger percentage of its GNP on research and development than did Japan.

(E) Both West Germany and Japan will soon surpass the United States in the number of patents granted to inventors.

From 1964 to 1978, spending on research and development never fell below 2.2 percent of the GNP in the United States and never rose above 1.6 percent in Japan. Therefore choice D follows from the information given and is the best answer.

Since no information is provided about the size of the GNP of any of the countries mentioned, neither choice A nor choice B is supported. The amount of information given about numbers of patents granted is insufficient to establish any general relation between spending and numbers of patents, so choice C is unsupported; and given that there is no information about the number of inventions patented in Japan and West Germany, choice E is not supported either.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
575 posts
368 posts