Deepakjhamb
i had a question here , if 90% of students were dual degree enrolled students than how can 30% students expect to graduate , isn't there contradiction with premises .
Also not sure if could understand how size of school matters when we are discussing about percentages - as it is mentioned that earlier
it used to be thought that difference was due to size of schools .
3rd question i have is could not understand the language aggregated at statelevel - what does this mean ?
Aren't Orangeland and Blueland states only - or are they schools - confused with the answer explaination
Thanks for the questions
Deepakjhamb! Since I didn't create the original question (I'm just a moderator here), I'll do my best to explain:
1. I think what the writer meant is that 90% of students at Orangeland are dual-enrolled, and it is
assumed that they won't expect to graduate with an associates degree in the next year. However, some of those 90% might actually think that they can, and that would bring the percentage of students expecting to graduate to 30% - the total of both dual-enrolled and regular students combined.
2. This is part of why it's a paradox. There is a general assumption that larger colleges are more successful at getting students to graduate because they offer better programs, get more funding, have higher standards, etc. In this case, they're asking readers to disregard that assumption that "bigger is better."
3. When they say that the numbers are "aggregated at the state level," that means that the percentages were also compared to all other community colleges in the state to try to determine if there is some other trend going on here, or if these graduation rates are similar to other schools in the state.
4. Orangeland and Blueland are the names of two schools in the same state, not two states.
I hope that helps!