NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 15:23 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 15:23
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Swagatalakshmi
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 434
Own Kudos [?]: 935 [82]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Dallas, Texas
Send PM
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 12 Feb 2021, 06:18
9
Kudos
72
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (01:45) correct 34% (01:58) wrong based on 3010 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E

Originally posted by Swagatalakshmi on 07 Dec 2006, 20:27.
Last edited by Bunuel on 12 Feb 2021, 06:18, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATmission
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Status:Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 190 [9]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: INSEAD Jan '13 Said LBS '14
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE:Other (Other)
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   20 Sep 2011, 22:20
6
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
IMO E

hogann wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A. The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation. - out of scope to some extent as we are not given any information on precipitation. INCORRECT
B. Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat. - So what?? Anyways we are supposed to talk about brazilian ash tree only. INCORRECT
C. Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.- again I would ask the same question - so what?? We are not concerned about for how much time certain temperature must remain rather we are concerned about the relationship between the temperature and the loss of rings. INCORRECT
D. The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness. - again out of scope. INCORRECT
E. The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable - An assumption is something which makes an argument complete. If the assumption were absent, the argument will fall apart. Here the conclusion is that only if temperature never exceeds 95 degrees, the age of tree will be predictable. What if the temperature also increases and still we are able to predict the age. The conclusion will not hold true in that case. Hence CORRECT

OA to come
User avatar
L
Bunuel
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618585 [2]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
CAT Tests Forum Quiz Mode
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   04 Apr 2021, 07:15
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.

(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.

(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.

(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.

(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The author concludes that one will only be able to determine the age of a Brazilian ash by counting its rings if the temperature in the tree's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit. The author bases this conclusion on the fact that the tree loses rings when the temperature exceeds that level. However, if the number of rings lost by a Brazilian ash at high temperatures could be predicted, then it might be possible to determine the age of a tree even if the temperature exceeds 95 degrees. The author assumes that it is not possible to predict the number of rings lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit.

(A) The argument says nothing about precipitation. This answer choice is out of scope since it would require a number of other assumptions to make it relevant to the argument's conclusion.

(B) Whether other trees share this feature is irrelevant; the argument focuses only on the Brazilian ash.

(C) This choice says that one day of temperatures above 95 degrees = one ring lost. If this is true, then we might actually be able to predict the number of rings lost (if we also know on how many days the temperature exceeded 95 degrees). This hurts the author’s argument; therefore, it cannot be an assumption on which the author depends.

(D) The thickness of the rings is irrelevant.

(E) CORRECT. The conclusion is that the rings will be a reliable measure only if the temperature never exceeds 95 degrees. This is true only if there is no way to predict how many rings would be lost when the temperature does exceed 95 degrees. (If it were possible to predict this, one might be able to assess the age of a tree using its rings even if the temperature had exceeded 95 degrees.)
General Discussion
User avatar
mst
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 133
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   07 Dec 2006, 20:59
2
Bookmarks
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.
(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.
(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.
(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.
(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable


I am somewhere among A, C and E

In E: Probably it does not matter whether we know the the number of rings lost when temperature exceeds 95 degrees. If we knew, say, teh tree loses 1 ring when the temp exceeds 95 degrees. we do not know how many days was the temperature over 95 degrees during the tree's lifetime (since we do not know tree's ag eto begin with)

A: I don't think we are really concerned about how the rings grow. The concern is how the rings can decrease

By POE, C seems to be the choice though it is a little strong because of the usage of only.

The information in the paragraph says: So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age. Usage of never seems to indicate that if the temperature is over 95 degrees on even 1 day, then the tree should at least lose 1 ring.
User avatar
Phoenix72
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 51 [2]
Given Kudos: 29
GPA: 3.5
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   25 Nov 2011, 04:34
2
Kudos
IMO E,

The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95
degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable- If the count of the rings lost due to high temp was know, then it would be easy to predict the age of the tree.

Clearly E.
avatar
bharatg
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [2]
Given Kudos: 51
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   21 Apr 2012, 17:26
2
Kudos
Nice explanation from..
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/mgm ... t3915.html

Conclusion: “ONLY if the temp in the Brazilian ash’s environment NEVER exceeds 95 degree F will its rings be a RELIABLE measure of the tree’s age.”

If we truly depend on a certain assumption to reach this conclusion, the conclusion should fall apart when we remove or negate the assumption.

Negate (A): The growth of new rings IS a function of precipitation levels.
Result: We could still conclude that the temp needs to stay below 95 degrees in order to use the rings as a measure. Thus, (A) is not an assumption upon which we really rely.

As you note, (A) is an appealing answer: It sure would be nice to know that there are not even more factors affecting the growth of rings. But there is a big difference between a nice-to-know assumption and an assumption-on-which-the-argument-depends. The GMAT always wants the latter!

Negate (E): The number of rings lost when temp exceeds 95 degrees IS predictable.
Result: We can no longer assert that the ONLY way to use the rings to reliably determine age is if the temps stay below 95. You are correct that we would need to know the complete temperature records and number of rings lost as a function of temp, but it would at least be possible to use the rings to determine age. The “only” in the conclusion is really the key word.
User avatar
sidhu09
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 159 [2]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   23 May 2012, 07:49
2
Kudos
The central point of the passage is to determine the age of the Brazilian ash trees.

Taking Option E - The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable

If we negate the above statement, we can rephrase it as follows:

The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is predictable.

Now if in a year, the temperature has exceeded 95 degrees, then we would know the number of rings the tree would lose before hand. If we would like to determine the age of the tree, then all we need to do is add the number of rings lost to the existing rings.

I hope my explanation makes sense. Would love to hear a different version which would help understand the problem in depth.
avatar
aniteshgmat1101
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 125 [1]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   23 Feb 2015, 00:13
1
Kudos
Pre-thinking:
Conclusion: Number of Rings are reliable only if temperature never exceeds 95F.
Author`s assumption: There is no reliable way to determine tree`s age if temperature exceeds 95F.

After POE got stuck between C and E. So, OA is E in-line with pre-thinking.
C cannot be the assumption because even the temperature reaches the threshold for 2 days, author`s conclusion is valid.
User avatar
AryamaDuttaSaikia
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 654 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   20 Feb 2016, 05:30
The contention of the author is that since the outermost layers of the wood of the Brazilian Ash peel away at a temperature above 95 degrees Fahrenheit these rings are not a reliable measure of the tree's age. The author assumes that the loss of the rings are not measurable. Only if the loss is unaccounted for then counting the rings to measure the tree's age will not be a reliable technique. Hence the answer is "E".
avatar
S
redfield
Current Student
Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Posts: 303
Own Kudos [?]: 271 [2]
Given Kudos: 80
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   02 Mar 2016, 16:00
2
Kudos
Can someone explain to me how C is also wrong?

Last line of statement "So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age."

C directly combats the usage of the word "never" in this statement. So the argument assumes that if the environment ever exceeds 95 degrees then it will lose a ring. Answer choice C is essentially this assumption.

The statement also says before this point ""often peel away" not "always", so by it's own admission the final sentence is harsher than the evidence given.
User avatar
AryamaDuttaSaikia
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 654 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   08 Mar 2016, 23:11
"C" gives an additional information. It states another fact. It is not a necessary assumption."Only one day of temperature" also is rather extreme in its tone.
User avatar
G
Nevernevergiveup
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2754 [3]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   24 Apr 2016, 07:02
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true.
However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat...................we are bothered about this particular tree. It does not matter if others lose rings due to some reason.
(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring........duration of heat exposure need not be assumed.
(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.....................thickness is additional information and need not be assumed.

While we can easily eliminate options B, C and D since they are out of scope.
Most of the candidates above(including me) got stuck between A and E.

(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation..............TRAP choice. This seems to indicate that during the scenario of more than 95 degrees Fahrenheit temperature tree only loses rings and does not grow them. This seems to divert us towards reverse causality assumption but there is no reason to assume anything like that regarding growth of new rings.

(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable
This may not look as attractive as option A but is the correct answer and can be veified through negation test.
If the number of rings is predictable then we can easily decide the tree age even if in high temperatures and this collapses the argument.
User avatar
L
gmatexam439
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [0]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: McDonough '21 (A$) Jones '21 (A$) Kelley '23 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   10 Oct 2017, 18:00
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeded 95 degrees Fahrenheit, its rings would be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
(A) The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation. -We are interested in the peeling of rings and not in the growth of the rings. Out of scope.
(B) Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat. -We are not worried about the other trees.
(C) Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring. -If this were the case, then we would be able to identify the age of tree even when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees, since as per the statement "a" ring (only one ring) is lost on a day having temperature greater than 95 degrees. Besides, this is just a fact set stating that the requirement for reduction in tree's rings. Irrelevant or, at best, weakener.
(D) The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness. -Out of scope
(E) The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable -Correct. If we can't predict this, then it means that on a day with temperature greater than 95 degree we can't determine the number of rings lost, thus we need a day with temperature less than 95 degree to find out the exact number of rings in the tree.
avatar
B
pbad
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Schools: Tepper '21 Johnson '21 Anderson '21 Foster '21 Marshall '21 Kenan-Flagler '21
GMAT 1: 730 Q41 V49
GPA: 3.96
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   16 May 2018, 17:35
1
Kudos
The question misses "Only" in front of if. The question in Manhattan states that the age can be predicted "ONLY if" the temperature doesn't exceed 95 degrees. The assumption being that if temperature exceeds 95 degrees we cannot predict the age.
E would be the correct answer if the question used "only".
In the current form[without "only"] the question discusses about a scenario when the temperature DOESN'T exceed 95 degrees so the predictability of age if temperature exceeds 95 degrees has no bearing on the argument.
User avatar
G
AnubhavC97
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2019
Posts: 116
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 296
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   26 Jul 2021, 03:32
AryamaDuttaSaikia wrote:
The contention of the author is that since the outermost layers of the wood of the Brazilian Ash peel away at a temperature above 95 degrees Fahrenheit these rings are not a reliable measure of the tree's age. The author assumes that the loss of the rings are not measurable. Only if the loss is unaccounted for then counting the rings to measure the tree's age will not be a reliable technique. Hence the answer is "E".

I m not happy with coaching given by Jamboree. Is there any way to take refund. I will post a detailed review also on GC
User avatar
S
krndatta
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Posts: 384
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   05 Apr 2022, 04:12
EducationAisle sir,
Please evaluate my reasoning.

Option A:- When we negate this option. We get "The growth of new rings is a function of levels of precipitation". Doesn't this weaken our conclusion because the growth is depended on precipitation and not on temperature exceeding 95 degrees Fahrenheit or not. Hence, we would be able to count the new rings.

Option B:- This is irrelevant because why does the Brazilian ash loose a ring is irrelevant.

Option C:- This is a weakener because this option tells us that we can count the number of rings when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees.

Option D:- If they are of uniform thickness or not, this doesn't matter. Can we count the rings or not is our concern.

Option E:- This is the correct answer.

Please share your two cents.
Thanks
User avatar
L
EducationAisle
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [0]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   05 Apr 2022, 06:18
Expert Reply
This looks good Karan!

Good job.
User avatar
S
krndatta
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Posts: 384
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [0]
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   05 Apr 2022, 08:09
EducationAisle sir,

Please share your two cents for option A.
and have a look at my reasoning for option A.

Thanks
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink] New post   27 Sep 2023, 21:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the [#permalink]
27 Sep 2023, 21:43
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions