GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Nov 2018, 02:15

# First Decision Reported on Decision Tracker  |  Join INSEAD Chat to Calm Your Nerves & Catch the Latest Action

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### How to QUICKLY Solve GMAT Questions - GMAT Club Chat

November 20, 2018

November 20, 2018

09:00 AM PST

10:00 AM PST

The reward for signing up with the registration form and attending the chat is: 6 free examPAL quizzes to practice your new skills after the chat.
• ### The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

November 20, 2018

November 20, 2018

06:00 PM EST

07:00 PM EST

What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.

# The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 26 Nov 2010
Posts: 5
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 07:26
The OA is E. But i contend the answers given in support for E. Here the author mentions that their is insufficient resources to prosecute illegal downloaders. So even if they do prosecute, that number will be very small. So why E. E seems to bear very little relevance to the argument. But if the number of illegal downloaders are itself small, then more people can come under jurisdiction, thus resolving the issue of lack of resources. B seems to be a more apt answer to this than E. Experts, please resolve this!
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1327
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2011, 18:03
2
This is a very subtle question - if you don't read the wording extremely carefully, it's easy to be tempted by a few of the answer choices. The key point to notice here is that we are concerned with "the **number of people** who illegally download music." We are *not* concerned with the number of illegal downloads.

_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Manager
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 143
Location: Singapore
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2011, 08:39
q)) The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not have the resources to prosecute all of the individuals who illegally download music from the Internet. Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited, the actions of the recording industry will have a minimal impact on the number of people who illegally download music.

The answer to which of the following questions would best help evaluate the accuracy of the conclusion above?

a) Will recording industry lawyers dedicate the majority of their time to prosecuting those who illegally download music?

b)) Is a small minority of individuals responsible for the majority of illegal song downloads?

c))Do many individuals who illegally download songs share their music files with other Internet users?

d))Will new Internet security technology permit the recording industry to more quickly and easily identify individuals who illegally download music?

e)) Will the threat of prosecution alter the behavior of those who illegally download music?

Good one.
I approached this question by questioning the conclusion.
If E were true, then the actions of the recording industry will have a <b>significant</b> impact on the number of people who illegally download music.
So, I chose E.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Intern
Status: Accepted - SMU, Singapore (Class of 2013)
Joined: 08 Sep 2011
Posts: 27
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2011, 09:12
I could quickly narrow down to B and E. The rest are all out of scope. A bit of thinking helped me choose E of the two.

Found this one quite straight forward.
_________________

p!yu\$h
http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-story-test-date-30-oct-122547.html#p995276

Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 595
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 02:31
Marcab wrote:
Can anyone give me a profound reason to eliminate B.
I reduced the options to B and E but I feel E has only a slight edge over B.

Lets see B and E:

"Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited, the actions of the recording industry will have a minimal impact on the number of people who illegally download music."

The answer to which of the following questions would best help evaluate the accuracy of the conclusion above?

b)) Is a small minority of individuals responsible for the majority of illegal song downloads?

If only a minority of individuals are responsible for the majority of downloads or if a majority of individuals are responsible for downloads, knowing it would not help evaluate the impact of the action on those who are not charged. Ok 10 out of 1000 (minority responsible) are prosecuted or 10 out of 100000 (majority responsible) are prosecuted - but do we know impact on everyone else? no.

e)) Will the threat of prosecution alter the behavior of those who illegally download music?
If we know that threat of prosecution can or can not change behaviour of others, we would know whther taking such an action would help or not.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1149
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 02:41
Hii vips.
Am i missing something?
_________________
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 595
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 03:07
Marcab wrote:
Hii vips.
Am i missing something?

Ha ha.. you actually created a case where you are going to punish 'all' responsible. this is surely going to have impact.
But would you be able to know so, if you know that 5% of people in world download music illegaly or 30% do?
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1149
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 04:37
"Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited", since the question itself says that these people will be punished, hence I can make that assertion or can't I?
_________________
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 595
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 04:56
Marcab wrote:
"Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited", since the question itself says that these people will be punished, hence I can make that assertion or can't I?

Number of people who are charged are limited... probably only 5-10 are getting punished and rest are not. This further supports the assertion made in previous posts.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1149
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 06:18
Vips0000 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
"Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited", since the question itself says that these people will be punished, hence I can make that assertion or can't I?

Number of people who are charged are limited... probably only 5-10 are getting punished and rest are not. This further supports the assertion made in previous posts.

Hope it helps.

B asks whether there is a small minority of individual responsible for the majority of illegal songs download. Now for evaluation, we answer the question either in terms of yes or no and then check whether these contrasting answers do really make an impact.
What I am saying is that if the answer is yes, ie there is a small minority of individuals responsible for majority of illegal downloads, and as per the stimulus, these people are charged with crime. Then it will make an impact.
But if the people who are responsible for majority of illegal downloads are many, and if only very few are charged then certainly there will be no impact.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 280
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 06:28
3

B suggests that by targetting a few people you could affect the number of SONGS dowloaded. But not whether you could affect the number of PEOPLE downloading.

In other terms, it's like saying most thieves only steal one thing and a few thieves steal lots. By arresting the thieves who steal a lot you can reduce a lot the number of crimes, but still the majority of people who have commited at least one crime are still free....
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1149
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 06:55
Hii plumber250.
Consider an example:
That's my point.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 280
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 07:14
1
Hi,

With your example you are correct. However that is not what B is offering to tell us.

So (to use small numbers) it would tell us amongst 10 dowloaders if the distribution is more like:

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 20, 22

or
5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5

But that doesn't matter if the question is asking about the number of downloaders, in both situations there are 10. And to arrest (say) 2 in either situation still leaves 8 out there
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 595
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 08:05
Marcab wrote:
Vips0000 wrote:
Marcab wrote:
"Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited", since the question itself says that these people will be punished, hence I can make that assertion or can't I?

Number of people who are charged are limited... probably only 5-10 are getting punished and rest are not. This further supports the assertion made in previous posts.

Hope it helps.

B asks whether there is a small minority of individual responsible for the majority of illegal songs download. Now for evaluation, we answer the question either in terms of yes or no and then check whether these contrasting answers do really make an impact.
What I am saying is that if the answer is yes, ie there is a small minority of individuals responsible for majority of illegal downloads, and as per the stimulus, these people are charged with crime. Then it will make an impact.
But if the people who are responsible for majority of illegal downloads are many, and if only very few are charged then certainly there will be no impact.

This is from where it was started.. you can re-read the posts or mark B instead
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2014
Posts: 13
Schools: NTU '17, AGSM '16
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2014, 11:43
1
the actions of the recording industry will have a minimal impact on the number of people who illegally download music.

E.

Clearly corelates the impact on the people.
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 33
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2014, 20:25
the conclusion says " punishing people ( very few ) will have little impact on NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ILLEGALLY DOWNLOAD "
b says " there a small number of people who are responsible for majority of the downloads "
if we prosecute 10 people this will not affect the number of people who illegally in this case ( 500) even though we have stopped majority of illegal download 9000.
on the other hand in we say that , no small number of people are not responsible for majority of downloads then there is no question of that curbing the number of people who illegal download the songs.

" the basic point is we want to know the impact of number of people who are illegally downloading the song and not the number of songs and since we know that people who get prosecuted are very few in comparison to no of people who do the download illegally so therefore until we do something that effect majority of ppl downloading , they ( ppl) will not get affected....so b is wrong
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 203
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2014, 06:56
I too chose B when I answered this question on a practice exam, but I realized that it is wrong, because the argument is concerned about the number of PEOPLE illegally downloading people and not the number of illegal downloads. More of this explanation can be found here http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/the-recording-industry-is-fighting-a-losing-battle-t406.html.
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 213
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2015, 01:40
Answer choice E, the correct answer, is extremely relevant to our conclusion. If threatening prosecution of illegal downloaders "alters the behavior" of illegal downloaders, the actions of the recording industry could significantly affect the accuracy of the argument's conclusion.
Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2013
Posts: 29
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2015, 13:05
3
A. Will recording industry lawyers dedicate the majority of their time to prosecuting those who illegally download music?
I don't care about lawyers time -- OUT

B. Is a small minority of individuals responsible for the majority of illegal song downloads?
May be....Hold it...will come back

C. Do many individuals who illegally download songs share their music files with other Internet users?

D. Will new Internet security technology permit the recording industry to more quickly and easily identify individuals who illegally download music?
What will they do after identifying those guys...that not what the argument is about -- OUT

E. Will the threat of prosecution alter the behavior of those who illegally download music?
If I see my neighbor being prosecuted for downloading 50 shades of gray...I will be **** scared to download any movie -- I like it...but let me look at choice B again --- Its not as good as E ..Done E it is
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Posts: 91
Concentration: Marketing
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2015, 09:07
2
The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not have the resources to prosecute all of the individuals who illegally download music from the Internet. Because the number of individuals who will be charged with a crime is so limited, the actions of the recording industry will have a minimal impact on the number of people who illegally download music. The answer to which of the following questions would best help evaluate the accuracy of the conclusion above?

A. Will recording industry lawyers dedicate the majority of their time to prosecuting those who illegally download music?

B. Is a small minority of individuals responsible for the majority of illegal song downloads?
If it is a small minority the recording industry still does not have the resources to take them down.

C. Do many individuals who illegally download songs share their music files with other Internet users?
Irrelevant. We are only concerned with the individuals who illegally download music, not the ones who share their music files.

D. Will new Internet security technology permit the recording industry to more quickly and easily identify individuals who illegally download music?
Identifying all the individuals does not mean that the recording industry still has the resources to prosecute the individuals. Remember, we are only concerned with prosecuting, not finding.

E. Will the threat of prosecution alter the behavior of those who illegally download music?
Re: The recording industry is fighting a losing battle: it simply does not &nbs [#permalink] 09 Mar 2015, 09:07

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 49 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by