GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Jun 2019, 00:18

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 75
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 4
The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Jan 2019, 01:09
6
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

51% (00:57) correct 49% (00:47) wrong based on 282 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million tons, nearly 769 tons less than 2007

A. less than 2007

B. less than those of the 2007 production

C. less than the 2007 production

D. fewer than 2007 production

E. less than that of the production in 2007

daagh: Sir, please explain. Stuck between 2 options.

_________________
Please give Kudos if you find this post useful.

Originally posted by anvesh004 on 13 Jan 2019, 00:55.
Last edited by Bunuel on 13 Jan 2019, 01:09, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4771
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Jan 2019, 02:34
2
Top Contributor
1
I suspect this is not a question from the noted Manhattan Prep company and may be from the second ring company Manhattan Review, as once explained by generis in another topic.

Let me tell you why.

1. estimated at is wrong. We never make an estimate at a precise and fixed factor. Estimates are always to be since an element of variance is always inherent in them.
2. while the production is mentioned in million tons, the shortfall in 2007 production is mentioned in just tons. It should be also in million tons. The lack of proofreading has led to a gross error.

Now on to the question. I presume you were stuck between C and D, (precisely between less and fewer).

The compared factors should be between the production in, God only knows which year, on one hand, and the production in 2007. Since production is a mass factor, less is usable. Please do not go by the thought that since some countable things as tons are involved, the correct thing should be fewer. As you see, 2712 ton is not being compared here with 792 tons, as one is production and the other is a shortfall. Use of less is ok as I see.

You will not only save a lot of time by avoiding such questions but also not get stuck.
_________________
The Take-Away: Grammar First and Then the Rest

Originally posted by daagh on 13 Jan 2019, 01:58.
Last edited by daagh on 13 Jan 2019, 02:34, edited 1 time in total.
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2016
Posts: 75
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 4
Re: The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2019, 02:11
1
daagh wrote:
I suspect this is not a question from the noted Manhattan Prep company and may be from the second ring company Manhattan Review, as once explained by generis in another topic.

Let me tell you why.

1. estimated at is wrong. We never make an estimate at a precise and fixed factor. Estimates are always to be since an element of variance is always inherent in them.
2. while the production is mentioned in million tons, the shortfall in 2007 production is mentioned in just tons. It should be also in million tons. The lack of proofreading has led to a gross error.

Now on to the question. I presume you were stuck between C and D, (precisely between less and fewer).

The compared factors should be the production in, God only knows, which year on one hand and the production in 2007. Since production is a mass factor, less is usable. Please do not go by the thought that since some countable things as tons are involved, the correct thing should be fewer. As you see, 2712 ton is not being compared here with 792 tons, as one is production and the other is a shortfall. Use of less is ok as I see.

You will not only save a lot of time by avoiding such questions but also not get stuck.

Thanks for the response

Yes, I was stuck between C and D and now it is clear on why C is the correct answer.

As you said, the question is from Manhattan Review. I am disappointed to see such feedback on what i purchased.
Will switch my sources from now, mostly concentrating on OG.
_________________
Please give Kudos if you find this post useful.
Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Posts: 39
Re: The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2019, 07:59
daagh wrote:
I suspect this is not a question from the noted Manhattan Prep company and may be from the second ring company Manhattan Review, as once explained by generis in another topic.

Let me tell you why.

1. estimated at is wrong. We never make an estimate at a precise and fixed factor. Estimates are always to be since an element of variance is always inherent in them.
2. while the production is mentioned in million tons, the shortfall in 2007 production is mentioned in just tons. It should be also in million tons. The lack of proofreading has led to a gross error.

Now on to the question. I presume you were stuck between C and D, (precisely between less and fewer).

The compared factors should be between the production in, God only knows which year, on one hand, and the production in 2007. Since production is a mass factor, less is usable. Please do not go by the thought that since some countable things as tons are involved, the correct thing should be fewer. As you see, 2712 ton is not being compared here with 792 tons, as one is production and the other is a shortfall. Use of less is ok as I see.

You will not only save a lot of time by avoiding such questions but also not get stuck.

How would the question have to be construed for 'fewer' to be ok here ? Although both are different parameters, they are still countable or is it one of the unspoken rule for two items being compared to be the same ?

e.g 10 tomatoes are less/fewer than 15 oranges ?

Students in Group A have an average weight of 73 KG which is less/fewer than 75 KG average weight of Group B ? The weight is countable and yet fewer seems very odd.

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Posts: 227
Re: The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Mar 2019, 13:17
saarthakkhanna04 wrote:
why is E wrong? I choose E.

less than that of the production in 2007
Here "that of " means Sugarcane production
therefore if you replace the antecedant in the actual sentence

the sentence becomes:
less than Sugarcane production of the production in 2007

Do you think that we do not need "production of production"
Meaning wise it is wrong and also leads to redundancy
_________________
"Press +1 KUDOS"

Be very critical of my Post
Ask as many questions of my post possible
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Posts: 304
Re: The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Mar 2019, 08:26
The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million tons, nearly 769 tons less than 2007.

A. less than 2007 --> comparing production w/ year, 2007

B. less than those of the 2007 production --> what is those of?

C. less than the 2007 production --> correct comparison: production vs production

D. fewer than 2007 production

E. less than that of the production in 2007 --> what is that? production(that) of the production in 2007??
Re: The sugarcane production in the country is estimated at 2,712 million   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2019, 08:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by