GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Jan 2019, 13:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### The winning strategy for a high GRE score

January 17, 2019

January 17, 2019

08:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 198
The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 03 Dec 2012, 18:55
2
17
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:24) correct 45% (02:38) wrong based on 506 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple psychological truth, that fear of retaliation makes a would-be aggressor nation hesitate before attacking and is often sufficient to deter it altogether from attacking. Clearly, then to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred?

(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks.

(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation.

(C) One nation’s failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation.

(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack.

(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.

OA soon.

Originally posted by nelz007 on 03 Dec 2012, 07:20.
Last edited by nelz007 on 03 Dec 2012, 18:55, edited 2 times in total.
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 145
Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2012, 08:53
1
(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks: Incorrect. It might be true but not a necessary condition.

(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation: Incorrect. Opposite

(C) One nation’s failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation: Incorrect. It might be true but not necessarily true.

(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack: Correct.

(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation: Incorrect. Out of scope.
Director
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 934
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2012, 09:56
nelz007 wrote:
The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple psychological truth, that fear of retaliation makes a would-be aggressor nation hesitate before attacking and is often sufficient to deter it altogether from attacking. Clearly, then to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred?

(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks.

(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation.

(C) One nation’s failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation.

(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack.

(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.

OA soon.

I think option D is out as the question type is inference, hence we need to stick to the boundaries of the question, option D mentions " has unsurpassed military power" thats no where discussed in the argument and is completely out of scope.

IMO its E
Manager
Joined: 20 Aug 2012
Posts: 51
Schools: Jones '15
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2012, 14:54
The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple psychological truth, that fear of retaliation makes a would-be aggressor nation hesitate before attacking and is often sufficient to deter it altogether from attacking. Clearly, then to maintain military deterrence, a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following can be properly inferred?

(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks.

(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation.

(C) One nation’s failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation.

(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack.

(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 198
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2012, 19:03
OA updated the answer is D. E has 2 issues

E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.

We aren't given any info about the degree of deference. Also, we have been given any other nation in this answer choice - the stimulus says "aggressor or potential aggressor."
SVP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1706
Concentration: Finance
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 May 2014, 16:20
OE for this one please? Is this from GMAT Hacks? Avohden could you please confirm?

Thanks!
Cheers
J
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 362
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 08:55
Guys, some help here would be nice.
I can't get why D is the right answer and not E.
anyone?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 685
The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 09:16
1
Quote:
Guys, some help here would be nice.
I can't get why D is the right answer and not E.
anyone?

the argument is talking about the "psychological truth" . notice the following wording "a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation."------------->no where in the text it is mentioned that the nation need to have such power in reality .it might be a "false impression" that this nations might have to create to have this deterrence !!!

why D ?
because this is what D is stressing at

why not E ?
E says: Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation----------->it is not necessary that the nation "maintains" such a force in reality !! the nation has to give that impression that it has such a power !! in fact this is very true in today's real situation

does it make sense ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 362
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 09:22
Quote:
Guys, some help here would be nice.
I can't get why D is the right answer and not E.
anyone?

the argument is talking about the "psychological truth" . notice the following wording "a nation would have to believed to have retaliatory power so great that a potential aggressor nation would have reason to think that it could not defend itself against such retaliation."------------->no where in the text it is mentioned that the nation need to have such power in reality .it might be a "false impression" that this nations might have to create to have this deterrence !!!

why D ?
because this is what D is stressing at

why not E ?
E says: Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation----------->it is not necessary that the nation "maintains" such a force in reality !! the nation has to give that impression that it has such a power !! in fact this is very true in today's real situation

does it make sense ?

Got it.
Thanks
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 105
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2014, 12:00
Got this one right but appears to be a tough one for me. Took 3:15 minutes to end up.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4361
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2015, 17:24
_________________
SVP
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1877
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2016, 03:22
2
2
A good question.

1. As per the theory - fear of retaliation makes a would-be aggressor nation hesitate before attacking
2. Hence the nation that has to defense has to show the aggressor that its military power is greater than that of the aggressor

(A) A would-be aggressor nation can be deterred from attacking only if it has certain knowledge that it would be destroyed in retaliation by the country it attacks.
Only is a strong word here. There can be other reasons too for not attacking.
INCORRECT

(B) A nation will not attack another nation if it believes that its own retaliatory power surpasses that of the other nation.
This is opposite of what is being talked about here
INCORRECT

(C) One nation’s failing to attack another establishes that the nation that fails to attack believes that it could not withstand a retaliatory attack from the other nation.
Again, there might be other reasons that he nation did not attack. Establishing a a fact is pin pointing to a reason. This is too strong a usage.
INCORRECT

(D) It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack.
CORRECT. This is what the argument is all about and resonates with our part 2.

(E) Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.
Requires again is a strong word. The nation can just tell plain lies to showcase its military power. It just needs to how the aggressors that it has more military power.
INCORRECT

In a CR questions, try to avoid strong words in the answer choices.
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1608
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2017, 18:52
this question is a LSAT question; perhaps, this question is from Manhattan. This question is interesting and hard. I personally do not think gmat will have such question b/c the way the reasons are written in the question does not sound like the way of reasoning in the gmat exam.

Test takers should check with experts.
Re: The theory of military deterrence was based on a simple &nbs [#permalink] 11 Dec 2017, 18:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by