Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:59 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 465
Kudos: 42,846
 [380]
27
Kudos
Add Kudos
349
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,534
 [173]
92
Kudos
Add Kudos
80
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sgrover18
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2017
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
128
 [48]
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 29
Kudos: 128
 [48]
30
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,764
 [3]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,764
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
AbdurRakib
The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of “theory of mind,” thus is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.

(A) of “theory of mind,” thus is best
(B) “theory of mind,” and so is best to be
(C) of a “theory of mind,” thus it is best
(D) of “theory of mind” and thus is best
(E) of the “theory of mind,” and so it is best to be

Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of this sentence is that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain “theory of mind”, so this behavior is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.

Concepts tested here: Meaning + Verb Forms + Grammatical Construction

• If a sentence contains only two elements, they must be joined by a conjunction.
• The "comma + conjunction" construction is used to join the last element in a list with more than three elements; the other elements are joined with commas.
• The infinitive verb form ("to + base form of verb" - "to + be" in this sentence) is the preferred construction for referring to the purpose/intent of the action.

A: This answer choice incorrectly uses the "comma + conjunction ("thus" in this sentence)" to join two elements in a list - the verb phrases "comes within the domain of “theory of mind" and "is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition"; remember, if a sentence contains only two elements, they must be joined by a conjunction, and the "comma + conjunction ("thus" in this sentence)" construction is used to join the last element in a list with more than three elements.

B: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "is best to be"; the use of the infinitive verb form ("to + base form of verb" - "to + be" in this sentence) illogically implies that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror is best for the purpose of being studied as part of the field of animal cognition; the intended meaning is that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition; remember, the infinitive verb form ("to + base form of verb" - "to + be" in this sentence) is the preferred construction for referring to the purpose/intent of the action. Further, Option B incorrectly uses the "comma + conjunction ("and so" in this sentence)" to join two elements in a list - the verb phrases "comes within the domain of “theory of mind" and "is best to be studied as part of the field of animal cognition"; remember, if a sentence contains only two elements, they must be joined by a conjunction, and the "comma + conjunction ("and so" in this sentence)" construction is used to join the last element in a list with more than three elements.

C: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "of a “theory of mind,”; the construction of this phrase incorrectly implies that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of one of many theories of the mind; the intended meaning is that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of a singular theory known as “theory of mind".

D: Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase "of “theory of mind”, conveying the intended meaning - that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of a singular theory known as “theory of mind". Further, Option D uses the phrase "is best", conveying the intended meaning - that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition. Additionally, Option D correctly uses conjunction ("and thus" in this sentence) to join two elements in a list - the verb phrases "comes within the domain of “theory of mind" and "is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition"

E: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "is best to be"; the use of the infinitive verb form ("to + base form of verb" - "to + be" in this sentence) illogically implies that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror is best for the purpose of being studied as part of the field of animal cognition; the intended meaning is that the type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition; remember, the infinitive verb form ("to + base form of verb" - "to + be" in this sentence) is the preferred construction for referring to the purpose/intent of the action.

Hence, D is the best answer choice.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,534
 [14]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,534
 [14]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nick90
Why is the comma used inside "theory of mind,"
Is it a typo error or is as per OG?
Dear Nick90,

Are you asking about why the comma is inside the quote marks? This is a subtle difference between British and American punctuation standards. As a general rule, if a word or phrase with quotes appears before a comma or period, Brits will close the quotes and then have a period, whereas we Yanks will include the comma or period inside the quotes;
... "theory of mind", thus ... = British convention
... "theory of mind," thus ... = American convention

Neither is "wrong" --- it's just two different conventions. Remember, of course, that GMAC, the folks that write the GMAT and all the official guides, is centered here in Reston, Virginia. They never test punctuation, in part because native English speakers from different countries have different conventions. Nevertheless, sometimes, in a non-tested part of a question, you will see the American conventions followed. Thus, it is not a typo. It is not someone trying to follow the British convention and failing: it is actually an entirely separate convention.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
vishakhagoel33@gmail.com
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Last visit: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of “theory of mind,” thus is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.
A. of “theory of mind,” thus is best
B. “theory of mind,” and so is best to be
C. of a “theory of mind,” thus it is best
D. of “theory of mind” and thus is best
E. of the “theory of mind,” and so it is best to be

Please explain

OG Verbal 2017 New Question(Book Question: 296)


i understand how the answer is d
but what i am not able to understand is that two independent clauses are to be separated by a semi colon or a common with a conjunction which is not the case in (d).

where am i wrong ?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,534
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,534
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vishakhagoel33@gmail.com
AbdurRakib
The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of “theory of mind,” thus is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.
A. of “theory of mind,” thus is best
B. “theory of mind,” and so is best to be
C. of a “theory of mind,” thus it is best
D. of “theory of mind” and thus is best
E. of the “theory of mind,” and so it is best to be

Please explain

OG Verbal 2017 New Question(Book Question: 296)


i understand how the answer is d
but what i am not able to understand is that two independent clauses are to be separated by a semi colon or a common with a conjunction which is not the case in (d).

where am i wrong ?
Dear vishakhagoel33@gmail.com,

I'm happy to respond. :-) Unfortunately, I don't know that I fully understand your question. In this question, in no choice are there two independent clauses. The sentence is attempting, with greater or lesser success, to put to verbs in parallel for the same subject. The subject is "type of behavior" and the parallel verbs are "comes" and "is [best] studied." Also, a semicolon is not used in any answer here. Are you asking about this question or another question?

Mike
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [9]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [9]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vishakhagoel33@gmail.com


i understand how the answer is d
but what i am not able to understand is that two independent clauses are to be separated by a semi colon or a common with a conjunction which is not the case in (d).

where am i wrong ?


Hello vishakhagoel33@gmail.com,

My guess is that since you saw the word thus in the sentence, you expected to see an independent clause after this word. Hence, the confusion why and is not preceded by a comma to make the "thus" part of the sentence independent clause.

However, that is not the case with this official sentence. So the takeaway point for you here is that it not necessary that thus will be followed by an independent clause.

It can be used with a verb to present the result of another verb/action.

If I misunderstood your question, please feel free to correct me and explain a bit more as to what is your confusion with the correct answer choice.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
1,343
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,343
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi mikemcgarry egmat

Can you please explain B/E in terms of wordiness and pronoun ambiguity, if any.
Why is phrase to be studied considered awkward in (B)

WR,
Arpit
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="AbdurRakib"]The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of “theory of mind,” thus is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.
A. of “theory of mind,” thus is best
B. “theory of mind,” and so is best to be
C. of a “theory of mind,” thus it is best
D. of “theory of mind” and thus is best
E. of the “theory of mind,” and so it is best to be

in choice b, " the type is best to be studied as part " is meaningless. the meaning is this type is best when it is stidied as part.... this meaning is no sense. "best " here is adjective modifying a noun.

"best to do" is used to say about a situation. in this case, the situation, but not the noun, is best

it is best for this book to be read as a part of the program. (this sentence is similar to choice d)

here, all the situation, but not the book, is best.

in choice d, "the type is best studied as part" means " it is best for this type to be studied as part...".
here , the situation is best while in choice b, the noun, type, is best.

so, " is +best+ to do " is used to say about a situation. a situation, but not a nominal, is best. so, in this pattern, we normally meet "it" as fake subject. the real subject, such as "the type" can not stand in this pattern.

it is best to learn gmat this way
it is best for you to learn gmat this way.
gmat is best to be learnt this way. WRONG.

not easy at all
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,534
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,534
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
hi mikemcgarry egmat

Can you please explain B/E in terms of wordiness and pronoun ambiguity, if any.
Why is phrase to be studied considered awkward in (B)

WR,
Arpit
Dear Arpit adkikani,

How are you, my friend? I'm happy to respond. :-)

Here's the original sentence with (B) & (E) as well as the OA, (D):
The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of “theory of mind,” thus is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.
B. “theory of mind,” and so is best to be
D. of “theory of mind” and thus is best
E. of the “theory of mind,” and so it is best to be


First of all, there is zero pronoun ambiguity. Pronouns are 100% fine in this problem.

Think about if we split this into two sentences---something that is not an option on the GMAT SC, but often a choice that a real world writer would make.
The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes within the domain of “theory of mind.”
Thus, this type of behavior is best studied as part of the field of animal cognition.

That second sentence is elegant and well-spoken.

Consider this change.
Thus, this type of behavior is best to be studied as part of the field of animal cognition
That's awkward. The structure is to be [past participle] is a relatively infrequent formal structure indicating a kind of philosophical necessity.
Harmonious relationships with all are to be cultivated in human life.
The structure, which fits in that sentence, has a ring of dogmatic authority, as if both Plato and Aristotle are assuring us that this is true. This might be fine for some grand sweeping philosophical statements, but for what amounts to a practice recommendation about a particular scientific field, this grammatical structure sounds 100% out of place.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thangvietnam


look at choice E.
"it" is not needed. if we insert it/pronoun as subject of the previous clause, not only the pronoun makes redundency, it also makes meaning error. the meaning error is that "it" can refer to a noun different from subject of the main clause.

Jone is good and he is also smart.

it is possible that he is different from Jone.

am i correct?


Hello thangvietnam,

I will glad to help you with this one. :-)

IMHO, the meaning error that you are talking about with the usage of it in Choice E does not stand. It is so because the the later part of the sentence uses the word so that establishes the relationship of the this part with the rest of the sentence.

Jone is good and he is also smart.

In the above-mentioned sentence too, there is no meaning issue because there is only one person mentioned in the sentence - Jone. Hence, the pronoun he will refer to Jone only.

But yes, we do have a structural problem in Choice E. The two independent clauses are not connected properly.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
sandysilva
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Last visit: 23 Apr 2019
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
Posts: 191
Kudos: 925
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My reasoning.
A- the two verbs comes and is for subject type of behavior are not corrected properly connected. Two verbs for same subject must be connected using proper parallel connectors.
B- "comma" and is used to connect two independent clause. Here and is not followed by independent clause.
C- "thus it is" and type of behavior comes, the two independent clauses are not connected properly. The correct way to connect two independent clauses is either by using "comma" + FANBOYS or by using semi colon.
E- and so are used together to conenct two independent clause. Also we are talking about the same subject that is type of behavior so there is no need to introduce another independent clause. We can simply take the subject common and connect the two verbs using a parallel connector.
D- fixes all the issues. The two verbs comes and is are connected properly.

I am no expert so let me know in case i missed something or got something incorrect. (:
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sandysilva
My reasoning.
A- the two verbs comes and is for subject type of behavior are not corrected properly connected. Two verbs for same subject must be connected using proper parallel connectors.
B- "comma" and is used to connect two independent clause. Here and is not followed by independent clause.
C- "thus it is" and type of behavior comes, the two independent clauses are not connected properly. The correct way to connect two independent clauses is either by using "comma" + FANBOYS or by using semi colon.
E- and so are used together to conenct two independent clause. Also we are talking about the same subject that is type of behavior so there is no need to introduce another independent clause. We can simply take the subject common and connect the two verbs using a parallel connector.
D- fixes all the issues. The two verbs comes and is are connected properly.

I am no expert so let me know in case i missed something or got something incorrect. (:

Sent from my SM-N9007 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app


Hello sandysilva,


I must say you have done a great analysis if this official sentence. Very neat and precise. Keep up the good work. :thumbup:

I would just like to add a few points about the incorrect Choices B and E.


Choice B misses the preposition of after domain. This is incorrect because A is studied in the domain of XYZ. So missing preposition is an additional error in this choice.


Choice E uses the expression it is best to be studied, suggesting that this type of behavior must be studied as part of the field of animal cognition as if it is not studied already in the present.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
longhaul123
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Last visit: 11 Nov 2018
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
35
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Status:IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Posts: 139
Kudos: 35
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is how i solved this question. So the option B is out because of the missing preposition. The use of pronoun IT in options C and E are incorrect because it can refer to either the behavior or the animal. In between A and D we need AND since the there are two independent clauses. Please correct me if am wrong.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,534
 [7]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,534
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
longhaul123
This is how i solved this question. So the option B is out because of the missing preposition. The use of pronoun IT in options C and E are incorrect because it can refer to either the behavior or the animal. In between A and D we need AND since the there are two independent clauses. Please correct me if am wrong.
Dear longhaul123,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, you are taking an extremely rule-based approach to GMAT SC. While you found the correct answer here, more or less by POE, I think you may be missing the forest for the trees.

I agree that we need "and," so (A) & (C) are out. I disagree that the pronoun "it" is ambiguous in any answer choice. Many elements at many levels inform the pronoun-antecedent relationship, and students often underestimate how much parallelism plays a role in determining this relationship. In particular, when two clauses are in parallel, and the subject of the second clause is a pronoun, this setup strongly suggests that the antecedent is the subject of the first clause. Another factor that influences the pronoun-antecedent relationship rhetoric, in particular, the focus of the sentence. The focus of the first clause is the subject "type of behavior," so it's crystal clear that this is the antecedent of "it."

I would say that (B) & (D) & (E) are all grammatically correct. The GMAT loves to create incorrect answer choices that are grammatically correct, because these befuddle the folks who look only at grammar.

The problem with (B) & (E) is that they are awkward. They both have the awkward structure "so is best to be studied as . . ." That's not grammatically wrong, but it's awkward. It feels off. It is a wordy, weak, sloppy way to convey this information. By contrast, (D) is sleek and elegant.

If you look only at the level of grammar rules, you will miss what the GMAT SC is about. On a correct answer on the GMAT SC, grammar and logic and rhetoric all coherently come together to produce meaning. You have to be thinking at all levels to understand the GMAT SC.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
Mansoor50
Joined: 29 May 2017
Last visit: 04 Jul 2021
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
Posts: 147
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
assuming that one is able to narrow the choices down to A and D, how do we decide between these two?

please comment on my reasoning below:

we have 2 clauses/phrases:

1. The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes
within the domain of “theory of mind,”

2. thus is best studied as part of the field of
animal cognition.

these are 2 parallel facts and therefore we need to connect them through the use "and"

Also, what is the correct definition...are these clauses? phrases or a clause and a subordinate something.....?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,479
Own Kudos:
30,534
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,479
Kudos: 30,534
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mansoor50
assuming that one is able to narrow the choices down to A and D, how do we decide between these two?

please comment on my reasoning below:

we have 2 clauses/phrases:

1. The type of behavior exhibited when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror comes
within the domain of “theory of mind,”

2. thus is best studied as part of the field of
animal cognition.

these are 2 parallel facts and therefore we need to connect them through the use "and"

Also, what is the correct definition...are these clauses? phrases or a clause and a subordinate something.....?
Dear Mansoor50,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

In version (D), the OA, the larger structure of this sentence is
[subject][verb #1]"and"[verb #2]
Technically, the entire sentence is one clause, and within this single clause, two verbs are in parallel. Here's an outline of version (D):

The type of behavior = SUBJECT
exhibited = participle, noun-modifier modifying the subject
when an animal recognizes itself in a mirror = verb-modifying phrase, modifies the participle "exhibited"
All of that first part is the subject and its long modifier. Then we get to the verbs:
comes = VERB #1
within the domain of “theory of mind” = predicate of verb #1
and = conjunction linking the two verbs
thus = adverb
is best studied = VERB #2
as part of the field of animal cognition. predicate of verb #2

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
teaserbae
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2022
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 191
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear egmat mikemcgarry

I have a doubt.
Here exhibited is in the past tense and comes is in the present tense. Does it make sense to have past and present in the same sentence, I am unable to understand it
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [1]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
teaserbae
Dear egmat mikemcgarry

I have a doubt.
Here exhibited is in the past tense and comes is in the present tense. Does it make sense to have past and present in the same sentence, I am unable to understand it


Hello teaserbae,

Thank you for your query. :-)

In this official sentence, exhibited is not a verb because it is not an action done by the subject The type of behavior.

The word exhibited is a verb-ed modifier that modifies The type of behavior because the said behavior gets exhibited.

Please review our popular article to learn how to distinguish between a simple past tense verb and a verb-ed modifier in the following link:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/ed-forms-verbs-or-modifiers-134691.html


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts