Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:52 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mojorising800
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Last visit: 05 Mar 2012
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
1,682
 [46]
Given Kudos: 7
Status:Its Wow or Never
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
42
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
shalva
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 203
Own Kudos:
342
 [12]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools:Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Posts: 203
Kudos: 342
 [12]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
jeeteshsingh
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Last visit: 03 Aug 2023
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 48
Posts: 177
Kudos: 1,001
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
coaks
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Last visit: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 370
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,439
Posts: 370
Kudos: 140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yep, I agree with jeeteshsingh. C unambiguously strengthens the argument by pegging the number of children available for adoption to a concrete number, which is far less than the concrete number of parents looking to adopt.
User avatar
Indien
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Last visit: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 81
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yep C.

The argument --far fewer children for adpation--is based on the fact that there are millions waiting to adapt but only 50,000 adpated in a year. The assumption must be that 50000 children were the only the available ones for adpation.
C confirms that assumption.
D and E are out of scope.
A does not generate any discussion.
B is tricky. It could be the answer if we knew how many people were waiting to adopt in the previous years.
ankur17
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Own Kudos:
0
 [1]
Kudos: 0
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shalva
This argument is yet another example of "shift of the scope" trick that GMAC so loves to pull out.

Premise
Quote:
Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
That's simply a statement of fact. The number of people who want to adopt is compared with the number of adoptions

Conclusion
Quote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.
In this conclusion number of people who want to adopt is compared with children available for adoption. This comparison is quite different from that in the premise. If we want to show validity of the conclusion - we somehow should establish following connection:

Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption

Answ (C) does exactly the same

Good explanation. No wonder you got a 47 on verbal. kudos to you.

Premise is just a fact here. I see the trick. Premise is trying to distract you. If C is not true then the conclusion falls apart.
User avatar
FQ
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 10 Oct 2010
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 54
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shalva

Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption

Almost missed that when reading the answers. Thanks
User avatar
mailnavin1
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Last visit: 04 Aug 2012
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Status:swimming against the current
Location: Chennai, India
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 119
Kudos: 356
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: less children available but many people are ready to adopt.
Premise: 2 million people are looking out for children and there were only 50,000 adoptions - This could be due there is a lack of children left to be adopted as the author says or there could be some other reasons. We are required to prove that there are no other options but fewer children available.

mundasingh123
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade. Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period. This says no children are left to be adopted, which means there are fewer children . Demand exceeds Supply :lol:
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies. - This says that there is another reason for less adoption, which means there are children but the policies makes it difficult - hence weakens
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents. - I dont care
This posts invites Discussions not answers - ROGER THAT :-D
Sorce:Mister Eko
User avatar
Zatarra
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Last visit: 07 May 2016
Posts: 310
Own Kudos:
365
 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Posts: 310
Kudos: 365
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mailnavin1
Conclusion: less children available but many people are ready to adopt.
Premise: 2 million people are looking out for children and there were only 50,000 adoptions - This could be due there is a lack of children left to be adopted as the author says or there could be some other reasons. We are required to prove that there are no other options but fewer children available.

mundasingh123
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade. Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period. This says no children are left to be adopted, which means there are fewer children . Demand exceeds Supply :lol:
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies. - This says that there is another reason for less adoption, which means there are children but the policies makes it difficult - hence weakens
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents. - I dont care
This posts invites Discussions not answers - ROGER THAT :-D
Sorce:Mister Eko
i tnink u have misread the stimulus . Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions
avatar
gettinit
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Last visit: 31 Jan 2014
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 80
Kudos: 269
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still think C would be vaild even though the figure of 50K is from 1982. The fact is this proves that the suuply is short just because there is less children up for adoption rather than some other reason -strengthens argument by alleviating assunption.

Thanks.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
saurabhgoel
Joined: 31 May 2010
Last visit: 04 Dec 2014
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Products:
Posts: 43
Kudos: 242
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its between A & C
but A doesnot tell anything about increase of decrease of the children.

Not fully convience with C , but in between A nd C , C is better..
User avatar
doe007
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Last visit: 03 May 2015
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 232
Kudos: 858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.
User avatar
mydreammba
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2013
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
1,625
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 224
Kudos: 1,625
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
doe007
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.



A speaks about last decade, i think here we are talking about present decade and that's why i chose C, but A is a good contender, please correct me if i am wrong
User avatar
tuanquang269
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Last visit: 18 May 2018
Posts: 375
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Status:Flying over the cloud!
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2 million couple waiting for adoption, but in 1982 only some 50,000 adoptions. The preceding premise stated that the children need adopting are fewer than the people want to adopt. So, this is clear that the 50.000 adoption is inferred that The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.

Choice C is correct one.
User avatar
doe007
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Last visit: 03 May 2015
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 232
Kudos: 858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kotela
doe007
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.



A speaks about last decade, i think here we are talking about present decade and that's why i chose C, but A is a good contender, please correct me if i am wrong

"Last decade" might be reason for discarding option A.
User avatar
doe007
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Last visit: 03 May 2015
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 232
Kudos: 858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tuanquang269
2 million couple waiting for adoption, but in 1982 only some 50,000 adoptions. The preceding premise stated that the children need adopting are fewer than the people want to adopt. So, this is clear that the 50.000 adoption is inferred that The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.

Choice C is correct one.

Here the reasoning has no connection with the given options. Rather this a paraphrase of the original statement. I believe we need to answer based on the given choices. Does really option C imply demand to be scanty?
User avatar
neha2785
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Last visit: 05 Dec 2012
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Posts: 66
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument is that number of children available for adoption is less then number of parent trying to adopt
E is irrelevant and so is D
A state’s growth in parent
B is irrelevant to argument
SO C is remaining and it states that children ready for adoption and adopted cild rate is more or less same, which mean only few children were deemed as not fit for adoption, thus proving the argument
User avatar
doe007
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Last visit: 03 May 2015
Posts: 232
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 232
Kudos: 858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
neha2785
Argument is that number of children available for adoption is less then number of parent trying to adopt
E is irrelevant and so is D
A state’s growth in parent
B is irrelevant to argument
SO C is remaining and it states that children ready for adoption and adopted cild rate is more or less same, which mean only few children were deemed as not fit for adoption, thus proving the argument

Option A does not state growth in parents but the "growth in waiting parents". Waiting increases only when demand is more than supply.
Option C can be inferred as demand is nearly equal to supply.

To me, option C is not stronger than option A. I believe wordings in the choices need to be modified to eradicate ambiguity.
User avatar
raviram80
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Last visit: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
133
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 65
Kudos: 133
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The below is the conclusion"

"There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

Answer C is saying

" The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period"

Isnt this restating the conclusion in another way

Is that fine for strengthen questions? I thought we have to look for a new information always.

please let me know

Thanks
User avatar
shadabkhaniet
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 38
Status:I will be back!
Location: India
Posts: 44
Kudos: 205
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
raviram80
The below is the conclusion"

"There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

Answer C is saying

" The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period"

Isnt this restating the conclusion in another way

Is that fine for strengthen questions? I thought we have to look for a new information always.

please let me know

Thanks

Its not restating the conclusion.

"The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period"
This doesn't mean that there are fewer children for adoption. Say there are 1 lac adoption previous year therefore there will be 1 lac adoption this year also. So we can't really say there are fewer children for adoption.

Correct me if i am wrong.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts