GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2018, 23:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 166
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 22 Jul 2018, 08:46
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (01:39) correct 39% (01:46) wrong based on 490 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.

Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?


(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade.

(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.

(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.

(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies.

(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents.

_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.


Originally posted by mojorising800 on 31 Jan 2010, 14:01.
Last edited by Bunuel on 22 Jul 2018, 08:46, edited 2 times in total.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Tuck Thread Master
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 283
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2010, 04:44
4
2
This argument is yet another example of "shift of the scope" trick that GMAC so loves to pull out.

Premise
Quote:
Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.

That's simply a statement of fact. The number of people who want to adopt is compared with the number of adoptions

Conclusion
Quote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

In this conclusion number of people who want to adopt is compared with children available for adoption. This comparison is quite different from that in the premise. If we want to show validity of the conclusion - we somehow should establish following connection:

Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption

Answ (C) does exactly the same
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 309
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2010, 14:16
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who
want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982,
the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim
that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who
want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last
decade.
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of
adoptions in any preceding year.
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of
children available for adoption in that period.
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of
interviews and investigation by adoption agencies.
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents.

Would go with C....

C strengths the no of adoption with the available children..... this gives the statement in the stem - "but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions." clear significance that no of children are few....!
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!! :beer

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|


~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 375
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2010, 10:31
Yep, I agree with jeeteshsingh. C unambiguously strengthens the argument by pegging the number of children available for adoption to a concrete number, which is far less than the concrete number of parents looking to adopt.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 188
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2010, 06:13
yep C.

The argument --far fewer children for adpation--is based on the fact that there are millions waiting to adapt but only 50,000 adpated in a year. The assumption must be that 50000 children were the only the available ones for adpation.
C confirms that assumption.
D and E are out of scope.
A does not generate any discussion.
B is tricky. It could be the answer if we knew how many people were waiting to adopt in the previous years.
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 3: 740 Q40 V50
GMAT 4: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 5: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 6: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 9: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 11: 500 Q47 V33
GMAT 14: 760 Q49 V44
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2010, 22:54
shalva wrote:
This argument is yet another example of "shift of the scope" trick that GMAC so loves to pull out.

Premise
Quote:
Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.

That's simply a statement of fact. The number of people who want to adopt is compared with the number of adoptions

Conclusion
Quote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

In this conclusion number of people who want to adopt is compared with children available for adoption. This comparison is quite different from that in the premise. If we want to show validity of the conclusion - we somehow should establish following connection:

Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption

Answ (C) does exactly the same


Good explanation. No wonder you got a 47 on verbal. kudos to you.

Premise is just a fact here. I see the trick. Premise is trying to distract you. If C is not true then the conclusion falls apart.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 108
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2010, 18:05
shalva wrote:
Number of adoptions == Number of children available for adoption


Almost missed that when reading the answers. Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 195
Location: Chennai, India
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 07:24
Conclusion: less children available but many people are ready to adopt.
Premise: 2 million people are looking out for children and there were only 50,000 adoptions - This could be due there is a lack of children left to be adopted as the author says or there could be some other reasons. We are required to prove that there are no other options but fewer children available.

mundasingh123 wrote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade. Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period. This says no children are left to be adopted, which means there are fewer children . Demand exceeds Supply :lol:
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies. - This says that there is another reason for less adoption, which means there are children but the policies makes it difficult - hence weakens
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents. - I dont care
This posts invites Discussions not answers - ROGER THAT :-D
Sorce:Mister Eko

_________________

Gonna make it this time

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 394
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 07:58
mailnavin1 wrote:
Conclusion: less children available but many people are ready to adopt.
Premise: 2 million people are looking out for children and there were only 50,000 adoptions - This could be due there is a lack of children left to be adopted as the author says or there could be some other reasons. We are required to prove that there are no other options but fewer children available.

mundasingh123 wrote:
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade. Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.Doesn't matter - Out of scope
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period. This says no children are left to be adopted, which means there are fewer children . Demand exceeds Supply :lol:
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies. - This says that there is another reason for less adoption, which means there are children but the policies makes it difficult - hence weakens
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents. - I dont care
This posts invites Discussions not answers - ROGER THAT :-D
Sorce:Mister Eko

i tnink u have misread the stimulus . Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 139
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2010, 11:32
I still think C would be vaild even though the figure of 50K is from 1982. The fact is this proves that the suuply is short just because there is less children up for adoption rather than some other reason -strengthens argument by alleviating assunption.

Thanks.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 71
Reviews Badge
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Dec 2010, 03:06
Its between A & C
but A doesnot tell anything about increase of decrease of the children.

Not fully convience with C , but in between A nd C , C is better..
_________________

Kudos if any of my post helps you !!!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 334
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 01:06
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 370
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 02:17
doe007 wrote:
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.




A speaks about last decade, i think here we are talking about present decade and that's why i chose C, but A is a good contender, please correct me if i am wrong
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 645
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 08:14
2 million couple waiting for adoption, but in 1982 only some 50,000 adoptions. The preceding premise stated that the children need adopting are fewer than the people want to adopt. So, this is clear that the 50.000 adoption is inferred that The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.

Choice C is correct one.
_________________

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 334
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 08:55
kotela wrote:
doe007 wrote:
I am finding some problems to buy the explanations given earlier. As the question states, we need to find the statement to strengthen the claim "far fewer children available".

Where option C can support the claim as "fewer children available", it does not support the claim "far fewer" from any angle. I can easily interpret that demand is equal or marginally more than the supply.

Option A states "The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly". In case the statement used the word "wishing" or "wanting" or something similar instead of "waiting", this option could have been ignored. But, when the number of couples, who are waiting, is increasing significantly, definitely demand is equal or more than supply. I don't believe couples would wait should there be necessary supply.

I do not see any reason which can clearly make option C standout over option A. I will appreciate any proper explanation to support C over A.




A speaks about last decade, i think here we are talking about present decade and that's why i chose C, but A is a good contender, please correct me if i am wrong


"Last decade" might be reason for discarding option A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 334
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 08:59
tuanquang269 wrote:
2 million couple waiting for adoption, but in 1982 only some 50,000 adoptions. The preceding premise stated that the children need adopting are fewer than the people want to adopt. So, this is clear that the 50.000 adoption is inferred that The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.

Choice C is correct one.


Here the reasoning has no connection with the given options. Rather this a paraphrase of the original statement. I believe we need to answer based on the given choices. Does really option C imply demand to be scanty?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 101
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2011, 10:16
Argument is that number of children available for adoption is less then number of parent trying to adopt
E is irrelevant and so is D
A state’s growth in parent
B is irrelevant to argument
SO C is remaining and it states that children ready for adoption and adopted cild rate is more or less same, which mean only few children were deemed as not fit for adoption, thus proving the argument
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Posts: 334
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2011, 18:48
neha2785 wrote:
Argument is that number of children available for adoption is less then number of parent trying to adopt
E is irrelevant and so is D
A state’s growth in parent
B is irrelevant to argument
SO C is remaining and it states that children ready for adoption and adopted cild rate is more or less same, which mean only few children were deemed as not fit for adoption, thus proving the argument


Option A does not state growth in parents but the "growth in waiting parents". Waiting increases only when demand is more than supply.
Option C can be inferred as demand is nearly equal to supply.

To me, option C is not stronger than option A. I believe wordings in the choices need to be modified to eradicate ambiguity.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 91
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2012, 16:28
The below is the conclusion"

"There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

Answer C is saying

" The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period"

Isnt this restating the conclusion in another way

Is that fine for strengthen questions? I thought we have to look for a new information always.

please let me know

Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: I will be back!
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Posts: 54
Location: India
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2012, 00:56
raviram80 wrote:
The below is the conclusion"

"There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt.

Answer C is saying

" The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period"

Isnt this restating the conclusion in another way

Is that fine for strengthen questions? I thought we have to look for a new information always.

please let me know

Thanks


Its not restating the conclusion.

"The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period"
This doesn't mean that there are fewer children for adoption. Say there are 1 lac adoption previous year therefore there will be 1 lac adoption this year also. So we can't really say there are fewer children for adoption.

Correct me if i am wrong.
_________________

--shadab
Gmat FlashCard For Anki

GMAT Club Bot
Re: There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo &nbs [#permalink] 22 Mar 2012, 00:56

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are peo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.