Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:01 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Deepakdc
Joined: 08 Aug 2020
Last visit: 15 Jun 2021
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 8
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
devansh18
Joined: 30 May 2020
Last visit: 01 Apr 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devansh18
I am unable to eliminate option A on solid grounds
Tricky indeed Devansh.

Quote:
Is option A incorrect since ", and" warrants a independent clause and we do not have a subject in that second part starting from ", and"?
No that's just fine.

An issue with few options presented here (including A) is the incorrect usage of "subjected to".

As mentioned here, when the intent is to portray a "legal position" (as is the case in the current sentence), subject to is the right usage.
avatar
kakakakaak
Joined: 04 Jun 2021
Last visit: 18 Dec 2022
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 936
Location: India
Schools: Alberta '23
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.33
Products:
Schools: Alberta '23
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
Posts: 40
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
my only problem with c is that it does not have verb after use of "and".
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,796
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,796
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KC
Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for diesel-powered vehicles.


A. powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

B. powered, and therefore not subjected to emissions-control standards that are as stringent as those of

X is SUBJECTED to Y:
Here, Y is an action that is actually performed upon X.
Every visitor is subjected to a background check.
Conveyed meaning:
If someone visits, a background check will actually be performed.

X is SUBJECT to Y.
Here, Y is not an action actually performed upon X but is only a RULE that APPLIES to X.
Every visitor is subject to a background check.
Conveyed meaning:
A rule specifies that -- if someone visits -- a background check MAY be performed.
However, there is no indication that a background check will ACTUALLY be performed.

A and B: subjected to emissions-control standards
Here, standards do not constitute an ACTION that is actually performed upon the vehicles.
Thus, this usage of subjected to is inappropriate.
Eliminate A and B.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kakakakaak
my only problem with c is that it does not have verb after use of "and".

Hello kakakakaak,

We hope this finds you well.

To provide a bit of clarity here, we would like to point out that "and" is not preceded by a verb either; "gasoline powered" is an adjective, as is "not subject to...", and both work in conjunction with the verb "are".

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN

Reading the explanations in this thread, I got a bit confused with answers that talk about "comma". I have well understood the OA and hence no issues there. However, as an aside with respect to "comma" usage, is the following understanding correct?

When Independent clauses are conjuncted by "and", there MUST be a "comma" before "and". (Manhattan SC guide states this)
In all other cases, in which clauses or phrases are conjuncted by "and", a "comma" before "and" is not wrong. Basically, an extra comma is not wrong as authors often use comma rhetorically to give a pause. (as a thumb rule!?)

Example:
He wanted to succeed and therefore he spent so much. WRONG
He wanted to succeed, and therefore he spent so much. CORRECT
Comma is needed to join two IC's.

He wanted to succeed and therefore spent so much. CORRECT
He wanted to succeed, and therefore spent so much. CORRECT - usually when sentences are long? official example (I just pulled out a CR question randomly) But she is worried that her blood of HDL, ''good'' cholesterol, is lower than is often considered optimal for heart health, and has thus considered consuming foods such as chicken or fish that would increase her blood level of this beneficial substance.
Comma is not compulsory, but not wrong if applied.

KC
Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for diesel-powered vehicles.


A. powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

B. powered, and therefore not subjected to emissions-control standards that are as stringent as those of

C. powered and therefore not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those for

D. powered, which are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

E. powered and therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of


https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/15/nyregion/albany-to-make-trucks-and-buses-pass-emission-tests-as-cars-do.html

Though the law will require testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor-trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline-powered and are not subject to standards as stringent as those for other cars. Sales of diesel-powered utility vehicles are beginning to pick up, however, and the diesel vehicles will be subject to the new emissions program for buses and trucks.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pankaj0901
AndrewN

Reading the explanations in this thread, I got a bit confused with answers that talk about "comma". I have well understood the OA and hence no issues there. However, as an aside with respect to "comma" usage, is the following understanding correct?

When Independent clauses are conjuncted by "and", there MUST be a "comma" before "and". (Manhattan SC guide states this)
In all other cases, in which clauses or phrases are conjuncted by "and", a "comma" before "and" is not wrong. Basically, an extra comma is not wrong as authors often use comma rhetorically to give a pause. (as a thumb rule!?)

Example:
He wanted to succeed and therefore he spent so much. WRONG
He wanted to succeed, and therefore he spent so much. CORRECT
Comma is needed to join two IC's.

He wanted to succeed and therefore spent so much. CORRECT
He wanted to succeed, and therefore spent so much. CORRECT - usually when sentences are long? official example (I just pulled out a CR question randomly) But she is worried that her blood of HDL, ''good'' cholesterol, is lower than is often considered optimal for heart health, and has thus considered consuming foods such as chicken or fish that would increase her blood level of this beneficial substance.
Comma is not compulsory, but not wrong if applied.

KC
Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for diesel-powered vehicles.


A. powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

B. powered, and therefore not subjected to emissions-control standards that are as stringent as those of

C. powered and therefore not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those for

D. powered, which are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

E. powered and therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of
Yes, Pankaj0901, your understanding of commas, for GMAT™ purposes, is sound. Remember, comma conventions are pretty flexible in written English. I wrote as much in response to a query on this official SC question earlier today. If a comma seems strange to you, do not eliminate the answer choice, but place it on hold and look to see how other answer choices may address the same issue.

Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just found an official sentence, from a CR option choice, that doesn't use a comma between two clauses separated by "and". :cry:

Link, Option C: https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-spacing- ... tml#p52699

(C) The flute was made from a cave-bear bone and the campsite at which the flute fragment was excavated was in a cave that also contained skeletal remains of cave bears.

But, I have not come across a single Official SC question that has a correct choice without a "comma" in between the two clauses. Of course, a "comma" isn't the reason to eliminate those choices, as those choices have bigger problems. But, the logic always helped to eliminate one or two incorrect choices quickly at least.

AndrewN
Pankaj0901
AndrewN

Reading the explanations in this thread, I got a bit confused with answers that talk about "comma". I have well understood the OA and hence no issues there. However, as an aside with respect to "comma" usage, is the following understanding correct?

When Independent clauses are conjuncted by "and", there MUST be a "comma" before "and". (Manhattan SC guide states this)
In all other cases, in which clauses or phrases are conjuncted by "and", a "comma" before "and" is not wrong. Basically, an extra comma is not wrong as authors often use comma rhetorically to give a pause. (as a thumb rule!?)

Example:
He wanted to succeed and therefore he spent so much. WRONG
He wanted to succeed, and therefore he spent so much. CORRECT
Comma is needed to join two IC's.

He wanted to succeed and therefore spent so much. CORRECT
He wanted to succeed, and therefore spent so much. CORRECT - usually when sentences are long? official example (I just pulled out a CR question randomly) But she is worried that her blood of HDL, ''good'' cholesterol, is lower than is often considered optimal for heart health, and has thus considered consuming foods such as chicken or fish that would increase her blood level of this beneficial substance.
Comma is not compulsory, but not wrong if applied.

KC
Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for diesel-powered vehicles.


A. powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

B. powered, and therefore not subjected to emissions-control standards that are as stringent as those of

C. powered and therefore not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those for

D. powered, which are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for

E. powered and therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of
Yes, Pankaj0901, your understanding of commas, for GMAT™ purposes, is sound. Remember, comma conventions are pretty flexible in written English. I wrote as much in response to a query on this official SC question earlier today. If a comma seems strange to you, do not eliminate the answer choice, but place it on hold and look to see how other answer choices may address the same issue.

Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
Anshul1223333
Joined: 04 Oct 2017
Last visit: 29 Nov 2022
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 69
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in C]

C. powered and therefore not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those for

1. don't we say ''subjected to something' ?

2. emission control standards as stringent as ( dont we mean here that emission control standards are appliied more stringently compared to rest of vehicles)


3. should there be a comma before 'and'
User avatar
RonTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 430
Kudos: 537
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anshul1223333
1. don't we say ''subjected to something' ?

Different meanings.

Subjected to = put through (some sort of difficult ordeal / stressful trial or test of one's abilities)
E.g., There is no reason why smartphones should be subjected to extreme tests that do not closely mimic actual real-life mishaps, such as being dropped onto concrete from a height of 15 feet.

Subject to = covered by / required to conform to (rules or regulations)
E.g., Smartphones sold outside Japan are not subject to the Japanese law stipulating that all camera phones must emit a full-volume shutter sound whenever a photo is taken.


Quote:
2. emission control standards as stringent as ( dont we mean here that emission control standards are appliied more stringently compared to rest of vehicles)

The sentence mentions standards that are NOT as stringent as those for certain other vehicles.

More importantly, this phrasing is the same in all five answer choices, so there's no sense in trying to question it or formulate nonexistent 'alternatives' to it.


Quote:
3. should there be a comma before 'and'

• GMAC's correct answers are not wrong. The answer to "Is this official correct answer wrong because _______?" is always no.

• The presence/absence of single commas is not tested on this exam.
User avatar
mansianand1234
Joined: 24 Jul 2017
Last visit: 02 Dec 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 22
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the first two below is a pair of dependent +IC

the 3rd clause is also a dependent clause. it is preceded by a comma.

1 Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles

2 it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles

3 almost all of which are gasoline powered and not subject to emissions-control standards


So, essentially we have- DC,IC,DC ? Is this the structure?
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for diesel-powered vehicles.

Option Elimination -

A. powered, and will not be subjected to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for - As GMATNinja beautifully explained the distinction between the usage of "they," the third-person plural pronoun, and "those," the plural demonstrative pronoun. "they" maintains continuity with a previously mentioned noun, while "those" introduces a new set for comparison or contrast.
The Smiths adopted two puppies last month. They have quickly become a beloved part of the family. Here, "they" refers to the same puppies.
The laptops she has are much more powerful than those I have. Here, "those" refers to the "laptops" but a different one. While we are on the same topic, "these" is another demonstrative plural pronoun used for plural things closer to the speaker. These cookies are delicious. And "those" refers to plural things farther from the speaker. E.g., Those birds are flying high in the sky.

Here, "those" refers to the emission-control standards but not the same standards for the diesel-powered ones. Diesel-powered uses diesel, and gasoline-powered uses refined fuel, which is gasoline. Moreover, Diesel powered have a higher compression ratio than gasoline, which means their operating principle differs. Can we use the same standards for both? No.

B. powered, and therefore not subjected to emissions-control standards that are as stringent as those of - "those for" is better as "diesel-powered" vehicles don't have standards on their own. We are talking about "standards" for "diesel-powered vehicles."Moreover, "subjected to" involves undergoing a process or experience, while "subject to" refers to under the influence or governance of certain conditions or rules.
E.g., The cars we drive are subjected to torture track testing during their development stage to ensure that all the parts are adequately designed.
All employees are subject to the company's code of conduct. Moreover, the "that are" relative clause is redundant.

C. powered and therefore not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those for - ok.

D. powered, which are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as they are for - "which" without "and" can refer to "gasoline-powered," which, because of the presence of the linking verb "are" is a subject complement of the earlier "which" but "gasoline-powered" is also adjectival and "which" as a pronoun" generally refers to noun and not adjectives. Moreover, we need "they" and not "those."

E. powered and therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of - "they are" adds unnecessary redundancy as we already have a subject and a verb that can refer to this part after "and." Moreover, we need "those for" as "diesel-powered" vehicles don't have standards on their own.
User avatar
NakulDiwakar10
Joined: 14 Jun 2021
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun MartyMurray
can you guys please explain why option e) is incorrect
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NakulDiwakar10
AjiteshArun MartyMurray
can you guys please explain why option e) is incorrect
Here's the (E) version.

Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered and therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of diesel-powered vehicles.

The first issue is that, in this version, "and" connects two independent clauses. So, it should be preceded by a comma, but it isn't.

The main issue is that "they" is a redundant subject. "Almost all of which" would logically serve as the subject of both "are gasoline powered" and "are not subject to ...," as in "almost all of which are gasoline powered and therefore are not subject to ...."

With the addition of "they," the logic of the sentence is broken. In fact, it seems to convey the following:

Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles ... therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of diesel-powered vehicles.

Notice that that version mixes the future and the present: "it WILL have no effect ... and therefore they ARE not subject," as if the future law is having an effect in the present. We can see that the meaning conveyed is not logical.

Finally, we can argue that "emissions-control standards as stringent as those of diesel-powered vehicles" conveys a somewhat illogical meaning since it seems to convey that diesel-powered vehicles possess emissions-control standards.
User avatar
NakulDiwakar10
Joined: 14 Jun 2021
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 33
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
NakulDiwakar10
AjiteshArun MartyMurray
can you guys please explain why option e) is incorrect
Here's the (E) version.

Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered and therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of diesel-powered vehicles.

The first issue is that, in this version, "and" connects two independent clauses. So, it should be preceded by a comma, but it isn't.

The main issue is that "they" is a redundant subject. "Almost all of which" would logically serve as the subject of both "are gasoline powered" and "are not subject to ...," as in "almost all of which are gasoline powered and therefore are not subject to ...."

With the addition of "they," the logic of the sentence is broken. In fact, it seems to convey the following:

Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles ... therefore they are not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those of diesel-powered vehicles.

Notice that that version mixes the future and the present: "it WILL have no effect ... and therefore they ARE not subject," as if the future law is having an effect in the present. We can see that the meaning conveyed is not logical.

Finally, we can argue that "emissions-control standards as stringent as those of diesel-powered vehicles" conveys a somewhat illogical meaning since it seems to convey that diesel-powered vehicles possess emissions-control standards.

MartyMurray thank you so much for such a detailed response
User avatar
Apeksha2101
Joined: 31 May 2018
Last visit: 06 Jun 2025
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 43
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is THEY incorrect and THOSE correct?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Apeksha2101
Why is THEY incorrect and THOSE correct?
This is because the sentence refers to two different sets of standards: 1) emissions-control standards for diesel-powered vehicles and 2) emissions-control standards for sport utility vehicles.

When comparing the two, we want to say that the emissions-control standards for sport utility vehicles are less stringent then THOSE for diesel-powered vehicles, where "those" refers to "emissions-control standards".

If we use "they" instead, it sounds like we are referring to the emissions-control standards for diesel-powered vehicles, and that wouldn't make any sense. We obviously don't want to compare 1) emissions-control standards for diesel-powered vehicles and 2) emissions-control standards for diesel-powered vehicles for sport utility vehicles. :dazed

In short, "they" makes it sound like we're referring to a single set of standards, while "those" makes it clear that we're referring to two sets of standards (one for each type of vehicle).

I hope that helps!
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts