Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:11 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Idioms/Diction/Redundancy|   Parallelism|   Verb Tense/Form|                     
User avatar
plaverbach
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Last visit: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Status:Studying for the GMAT
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 (Online)
WE:Business Development (Finance: Venture Capital)
Products:
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 (Online)
Posts: 215
Kudos: 535
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
plaverbach
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Last visit: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Status:Studying for the GMAT
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 (Online)
WE:Business Development (Finance: Venture Capital)
Products:
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41 (Online)
Posts: 215
Kudos: 535
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
adityaganjoo
Joined: 10 Jan 2021
Last visit: 04 Oct 2022
Posts: 148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 148
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
I see different calls for help in at least three different posts, so I'll try to address everything in one big, fat explanation:

Quote:
(A) benefits, letting employees pick those most important to them
"Those" is just a plural pronoun here, so we should look for some plural noun that it can refer back to. "Benefits" makes sense, right? "...letting employees pick the benefits most important to them." So we're good there. (And for more on demonstrative pronouns, check out our Topic of the Week or our YouTube video about the many uses of "that.")

And yes, "benefits" is an object, but there's no reason why a pronoun can't refer back to an object. There's some weird myth going around about that, and I'm not sure where it's coming from. Pronouns can refer to subjects or objects.

"Letting" is used as a modifier here (click here for more on "-ing" modifiers), and that makes sense: "letting employees pick (the benefits) most important to them" is giving us more information about what happens when "companies are offering a wider range of benefits." So it makes sense for "letting" to be a modifier, not a verb. Keep (A).

Quote:
(B) benefits, letting employees pick the most important of them to themselves
"Themselves" is a reflexive pronoun. Correct uses of reflexive pronouns:

    Mike was proud of himself when he successfully surfed a 25-foot wave.
    Bogdan and Souvik admired themselves in the mirror after crushing the GMAT.

But I don't think we can justify using "themselves" in the original sentence. Employees can pick the benefits that are most important to them -- but there's no need for the reflexive "themselves." (And for whatever it's worth: I can't think of another official GMAT question that draws any sort of distinction between reflexive and non-reflexive pronouns.) Also, I think it's a little bit confusing to have "them" refer to "benefits", while "themselves" refers back to "employees" -- but either way, (B) is out.

Quote:
(C) benefits and letting employees pick the most important to themselves
I think I could live with the parallelism here: "letting" follows "and", so we need to find something that's parallel to "letting." How about "offering"? So "some companies are offering..." and "some companies are letting..." I guess that's OK, though I think the sentences works a little bit better if "letting" is a modifier, but I wouldn't automatically eliminate (C) because of that.

But the "themselves" is wrong again - "them" would be fine. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) benefits and let employees pick the most important to them
Now there's a clear parallelism issue. "Let" is a verb, and I guess it could be parallel to "are offering" -- but if that's the case, why are they in different tenses? That can't be right. The only other option is "attract", and that would make any sense, either. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) benefits and let employees pick those that are most important to themselves
Same parallelism error as in (D), and the same error with "themselves" as in (B) and (C).

So (A) wins.

GMATNinja aren't (C), (D), (E) structurally incorrect? Use of "and" shows that both of these things are offered, while actually only multiple benefits are offered, and employees are allowed to choose from those benefits only. I am not sure on my assertion. Would request your views.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adityaganjoo

GMATNinja aren't (C), (D), (E) structurally incorrect? Use of "and" shows that both of these things are offered, while actually only multiple benefits are offered, and employees are allowed to choose from those benefits only. I am not sure on my assertion. Would request your views.
I wouldn't say "incorrect" so much as unnecessarily confusing. After all, if a sentence began, "The store offered dog-owners a discount and denied entry to cat-owners," I might read the part in red and anticipate that I'm about to see a second thing offered to the dog-owners.

Of course, that's not what follows. Instead of seeing a second thing offered to dog-owners, we get a second action, "denied," performed by the store. But "offered" and "denied" are parallel verb forms, so there's nothing technically wrong here, even though it takes a little extra work to understand the meaning.

Similar situation with (C), (D), (E), at least so far as strict parallelism goes. Yeah, it's true that you might initially think that we're about to see a second item that the companies are offering, and then have to reread to see that the actual parallelism is "offering" and "letting" in (C), and "are" and "let" in (D) and (E). But those constructions aren't inherently wrong.

But as we mentioned in an earlier post, we've got other problems here. In (C), and (E), "themselves" is incorrect, and in (D) and (E) we have the incoherent verb tense switch from the present "are" and the past "let." So it's best to dig a little deeper and consider the logic before eliminating.

That said, if I didn't see another concrete issue, and I had to use the potential confusion caused by the use of "and" as a tie-breaker, I'd be comfortable doing that.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
LaveenaPanchal
Joined: 06 Oct 2020
Last visit: 17 May 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22
Schools: ISB'22
Posts: 127
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey, wht cant i see the question in the beginning of this post

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,346
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LaveenaPanchal
Hey, wht cant i see the question in the beginning of this post

Posted from my mobile device

This thread has 3 pages. Check the first post on page 1: https://gmatclub.com/forum/to-attract-t ... l#p1862957
User avatar
LaveenaPanchal
Joined: 06 Oct 2020
Last visit: 17 May 2024
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Schools: ISB'22
Schools: ISB'22
Posts: 127
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thankyou Bunuel..

To attract the most talented workers, some companies are offering a wider range of benefits, letting employees pick those most important to them.


(A) benefits, letting employees pick those most important to them. Correct. It is a modifier describing the previous sentence

(B) benefits, letting employees pick the most important of them to themselves.

(C) benefits and letting employees pick the most important to themselves

(D) benefits and let employees pick the most important to them

(E) benefits and let employees pick those that are most important to themselves
User avatar
adityaganjoo
Joined: 10 Jan 2021
Last visit: 04 Oct 2022
Posts: 148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 148
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
adityaganjoo

GMATNinja aren't (C), (D), (E) structurally incorrect? Use of "and" shows that both of these things are offered, while actually only multiple benefits are offered, and employees are allowed to choose from those benefits only. I am not sure on my assertion. Would request your views.
I wouldn't say "incorrect" so much as unnecessarily confusing. After all, if a sentence began, "The store offered dog-owners a discount and denied entry to cat-owners," I might read the part in red and anticipate that I'm about to see a second thing offered to the dog-owners.

Of course, that's not what follows. Instead of seeing a second thing offered to dog-owners, we get a second action, "denied," performed by the store. But "offered" and "denied" are parallel verb forms, so there's nothing technically wrong here, even though it takes a little extra work to understand the meaning.

Similar situation with (C), (D), (E), at least so far as strict parallelism goes. Yeah, it's true that you might initially think that we're about to see a second item that the companies are offering, and then have to reread to see that the actual parallelism is "offering" and "letting" in (C), and "are" and "let" in (D) and (E). But those constructions aren't inherently wrong.

But as we mentioned in an earlier post, we've got other problems here. In (C), and (E), "themselves" is incorrect, and in (D) and (E) we have the incoherent verb tense switch from the present "are" and the past "let." So it's best to dig a little deeper and consider the logic before eliminating.

That said, if I didn't see another concrete issue, and I had to use the potential confusion caused by the use of "and" as a tie-breaker, I'd be comfortable doing that.

I hope that helps!

GMATNinja This made it so much clearer. Thanks a lot! You are a rockstar :)
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
I see different calls for help in at least three different posts, so I'll try to address everything in one big, fat explanation:

Quote:
(A) benefits, letting employees pick those most important to them
"Those" is just a plural pronoun here, so we should look for some plural noun that it can refer back to. "Benefits" makes sense, right? "...letting employees pick the benefits most important to them." So we're good there. (And for more on demonstrative pronouns, check out our Topic of the Week or our YouTube video about the many uses of "that.")

And yes, "benefits" is an object, but there's no reason why a pronoun can't refer back to an object. There's some weird myth going around about that, and I'm not sure where it's coming from. Pronouns can refer to subjects or objects.

"Letting" is used as a modifier here (click here for more on "-ing" modifiers), and that makes sense: "letting employees pick (the benefits) most important to them" is giving us more information about what happens when "companies are offering a wider range of benefits." So it makes sense for "letting" to be a modifier, not a verb. Keep (A).

Quote:
(B) benefits, letting employees pick the most important of them to themselves
"Themselves" is a reflexive pronoun. Correct uses of reflexive pronouns:

    Mike was proud of himself when he successfully surfed a 25-foot wave.
    Bogdan and Souvik admired themselves in the mirror after crushing the GMAT.

But I don't think we can justify using "themselves" in the original sentence. Employees can pick the benefits that are most important to them -- but there's no need for the reflexive "themselves." (And for whatever it's worth: I can't think of another official GMAT question that draws any sort of distinction between reflexive and non-reflexive pronouns.) Also, I think it's a little bit confusing to have "them" refer to "benefits", while "themselves" refers back to "employees" -- but either way, (B) is out.

Quote:
(C) benefits and letting employees pick the most important to themselves
I think I could live with the parallelism here: "letting" follows "and", so we need to find something that's parallel to "letting." How about "offering"? So "some companies are offering..." and "some companies are letting..." I guess that's OK, though I think the sentences works a little bit better if "letting" is a modifier, but I wouldn't automatically eliminate (C) because of that.

But the "themselves" is wrong again - "them" would be fine. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) benefits and let employees pick the most important to them
Now there's a clear parallelism issue. "Let" is a verb, and I guess it could be parallel to "are offering" -- but if that's the case, why are they in different tenses? That can't be right. The only other option is "attract", and that would make any sense, either. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) benefits and let employees pick those that are most important to themselves
Same parallelism error as in (D), and the same error with "themselves" as in (B) and (C).

So (A) wins.

GMATNinja

I have a question. In D, Is it an absolute rule that different tense is automatically wrong? I used to see "Past tense" parallel with "Present tense".
I eliminate this choice because of "the most important". (Should it add "benefits or pronoun that refers to benefits?)

Please, correct me If I'm wrong.

Thank you
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat
Actually, all of the verbs in each choice are in the present tense (or present continuous). I mean, "let" is the same in both past and present, but there's no compelling reason to read it as past tense here.

The problem is that "offering" by itself is not a verb at all (-ing words never are). Rather, it forms part of the verb phrase "are offering." Therefore, if we use "and" to create parallel phrases (as C-E do), we need "letting" (to be parallel with "offering") or "are letting" (to be parallel with "are offering"). IF we went for "are offering" and "let" as our parallel verbs, we'd have an odd difference in presentation. One way to see this is to notice that "are offering" is present continuous (ongoing current action), while "let" is simple present (general statement of current status). This provides a bit of a contrast and doesn't make it clear that the second part (letting people choose) is part of the same plan as the first part.

More generally, it's fine to switch tenses in parallel verbs if that's what the meaning requires: "Laura was born in Egypt and now lives in Canada." However, in most SC answers, this shift is made for no good reason and creates a flaw.
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Tanchat
Actually, all of the verbs in each choice are in the present tense (or present continuous). I mean, "let" is the same in both past and present, but there's no compelling reason to read it as past tense here.

The problem is that "offering" by itself is not a verb at all (-ing words never are). Rather, it forms part of the verb phrase "are offering." Therefore, if we use "and" to create parallel phrases (as C-E do), we need "letting" (to be parallel with "offering") or "are letting" (to be parallel with "are offering"). IF we went for "are offering" and "let" as our parallel verbs, we'd have an odd difference in presentation. One way to see this is to notice that "are offering" is present continuous (ongoing current action), while "let" is simple present (general statement of current status). This provides a bit of a contrast and doesn't make it clear that the second part (letting people choose) is part of the same plan as the first part.

More generally, it's fine to switch tenses in parallel verbs if that's what the meaning requires: "Laura was born in Egypt and now lives in Canada." However, in most SC answers, this shift is made for no good reason and creates a flaw.

DmitryFarber

I got it, thank you :)

I have another question. What is about "the most important" ? Is pronoun (refer to benefits needed?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanchat
I don't quite follow your question. Are you asking what "the most important" means in D? That can be a tricky game to play, since in an incorrect answer there may be parts that simply don't convey any clear meaning. If we wanted to create a correct answer, we'd probably say something like "pick the most important ones," so that "most important" would just be a modifier (important is an adjective). Sometimes, however, we used a comparative adjective to imply the noun, as in "I selected the larger of the two" or "You can try all three, and then decide on the best." In those cases, "one" or "ones" is implied after larger/best. We can even add a modifier that narrows down what we are talking about: we said "the larger of the two," and we could say "the best of the available options." However, if we add some *other* kind of modifier, we should have a clear noun for it to apply to. In other words, we can't say "pick the most important for your situation," but we can say "pick the most important benefits for your situation." (I'm avoiding using the same wording from D, since almost all of it is problematic.)
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 222
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Tanchat
I don't quite follow your question. Are you asking what "the most important" means in D. That can be a tricky game to play, since in an incorrect answer there may be parts that simply don't convey any clear meaning. If we wanted to create a correct answer, we'd probably say something like "pick the most important ones," so that "most important" would just be a modifier (important is an adjective). Sometimes, however, we used a comparative adjective to imply the noun, as in "I selected the larger of the two" or "You can try all three, and then decide on the best." In those cases, "one" or "ones" is implied after larger/best. We can even add a modifier that narrows down what we are talking about: we said "the larger of the two," and we could say "the best of the available options." However, if we add some *other* kind of modifier, we should have a clear noun for it to apply to. In other words, we can't say "pick the most important for your situation," but we can say "pick the most important benefits for your situation." (I'm avoiding using the same wording from D, since almost all of it is problematic.)

DmitryFarber

Thank you, I got it !
User avatar
Rasalghul853
Joined: 24 Jan 2019
Last visit: 15 Jan 2024
Posts: 148
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39
GPA: 2.81
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V39
Posts: 148
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Letting is modifying the verb "are offering" in option A. Is that a logical use?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rasalghul853
Letting is modifying the verb "are offering" in option A. Is that a logical use?
In this case, the phrase, "letting them pick those most important to them" appears to be giving context to the previous clause, "some companies are offering a wider range of benefits." So in the first clause, we learn that more benefits are available to employees, and in the "-ing" modifier, we learn that these employees have some say about which of these options they receive. Perfectly logical.

The takeaway: anytime you see the construction "full clause + comma + -ING modifier," ask yourself whether the -ing modifier is giving a consequence of the previous action, or providing context for the previous action. If it does either, the modifier is fine, and you want to move on to other issues.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
vikhyathsuvarna
Joined: 17 May 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Products:
Schools: ISB '20
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To attract the most talented workers, some companies are offering a wider range of benefits, letting employees pick those most important to them.

Meaning: In order to attract the most talented workers, some of the companies are offering a wider range of benefits to their employees. Thus because of the availability of wider range of benefits, the employees are able to pick those benefits that are most important to them (employees).

Errors: There are no errors in the sentence. The pronoun "those" correctly refers to "benefits" and "them" correctly refers to "employees". Hence Option A is the correct answer choice.



(A) benefits, letting employees pick those most important to them - Correct

(B) benefits, letting employees pick the most important of them to themselves - Incorrect
"Them" logically refers to "employees" but this leads to a distorts the meaning of the sentence. How can employees pick the most important employees to themselves. Hence this is an incorrect answer choice.


(C) benefits and letting employees pick the most important to themselves - Incorrect
This changes the meaning of the sentence by bringing a parallel structure. This sentence says that, the companies are offering a wider range of benefits and the companies are letting employees pick the most important to themselves. This does not make sense. Also we do not know what the company is letting the employees to pick.


(D) benefits and let employees pick the most important to them - Incorrect
This contains the same error as option C. Also this forms an incorrect parallel structure


(E) benefits and let employees pick those that are most important to themselves - Incorrect
This contains the same error as option C. Also this forms an incorrect parallel structure
avatar
bahruz1992
Joined: 30 Mar 2020
Last visit: 25 Mar 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 17
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can we say that in option (C), the verb “pick” misses an object and that is why it is incorrect option?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bahruz1992
Can we say that in option (C), the verb “pick” misses an object and that is why it is incorrect option?

Posted from my mobile device
You're not the only one to wonder about this! Check out our response here and let us know if you still have questions.
avatar
tony1stark
Joined: 29 Aug 2021
Last visit: 27 Mar 2022
Posts: 2
Location: Germany
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi there,

I am a bit confused on the modifier of choice A, "letting employees pick those most important to them".

How is it structured? Should it be letting employees pick those "that are" most important to them? Or we can leave "that are" in this case as it is the modifier?

If so, how about in a normal sentence? Can we say "Companies let employees pick benefits most important to them." or "Companies let employees pick benefits that are most important to them." ?

Thank you!
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts