His study material is simply poor quality copy paste work. None of his claims can be verified. Refrain from falling to his gimmick.

I want to know what happened to csquare founded by kalyan chamrathi / Rashmi P .gowda.
This institute became very famous in 2011-2014s. Any updates on them? or was it a fake publicity?

please do share comments if anyone knows:)

They are the biggest scammer. Guy, Kalyan still uses old material and tactics. Now he runs the company under scoreleap. As GMAT tutor, he doesn't even know gmatclub exists. He used to make B grade films on youtube and was out of touch for a while. Also, he won't give proof of getting 770 in GMAT. He will just take your money and teach you nothing. They just convert student who are desperate and claim that people have gone from 400 to 770 in 2 months. LOL.

I don’t know who these guys are either but I can tell you that numerous analysis and research of various verified candidates and their score improvement showed that some of the most expensive courses in the United States provide an average improvement of about 150 points. These are in person courses that cost over $1000 and use proprietary materials. This is an average number that means that someone may have gotten only 50 points and someone else may have gotten 200. Improvement varies on a person by person.

They have probably been fewer than 20 total people on GMAT Club who have improved the score by 300 or more points.

If you believe that some guy in a basement with some scraps can outperform large prep companies that spend millions on improving their materials, you’re fooling yourself. Score improvement is a very personal characteristic. Some people will improve with nothing while others will struggle with the best of materials. Obviously A rising tide lifts all boats, but the point being, you have to be realistic with your expectations and not fall so crazy promises. Again, we only have fewer than 20 cases of people improving by 300 points or more. It is a pretty big deal when someone improves by 200... so don’t let someone tell you that you should improve 300 points and then shame you for not doing enough work. It was not a realistic expectation. You can count on an average of 150 points for and in person or online class that keeps you on schedule and if you do all your homework very diligently.

But if you delegate your prep or think that the active paying some dude a large sum of money will somehow make you more likely to study then you’re simply fooling yourself and you deserve to part with the money because you chose to do that knowing in the back of your mind but likely this isn’t going to work... But you decided to not listen to yourself and not to take the hard path but instead pay for an easy path that would likely not network... and then you end up with a product that did not work and a bunch of shortcuts and no knowledge gained.

We reap what we sow.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

In last November, someone sent me word doc of Sandeep Gupta's questions and asked me for help. When I solved his doubts, I found that those questions were Manhattan 700 level questions. I suggested my friend, who was still struggling with 600 level questions, that do not attempt these questions because a:) these are 700 level Manhattan questions b:) few of these questions are copied incorrectly c:) you can find better formatting and correct questions on gmatclub.
_________________

feeling sad for your friend. he must have spent significant amount of time in dealing that nonsense.