Let's rewrite the Top managment argument:1) The new system offers unique methods of administrating the hospital
2) It is free
3) If implemented properly, it will lead to high employee & customers satisfaction
4) it will lead to reduced recovery time (in other words, patients will leave hospital quickly)
___
5) Therefore, This will be very financially beneficial (from 1-4)
__
Optional (6) Therefore, we should implement it
Now, to cast doubt on their argument, means we need to weaken their conclusion (#5 from above). A Piece of information that will make them rethink implementing this new system.
Your argument:(1) The hospital is never fully occupied (from the passage)
(2) .............. (the missing piece that can strengthen your argument)
___
(3) Therefore, it is not very financially beneficial (the opposite conclusion)
Prethinking the answer, their conclusion is not valid if:
(1) this new system requires costly training
(2) The new system requires costly maintainance
We can't prethink everything so let's jump to the choice and see if there is anything that we can add to top list:
A) The management system has been applied to many hospitals similar in size to Amgudnow though for most it was the not the first of such protocols to have been adopted, others usually costing high prices for their use.
In other words, the other systems cost more. Imagine using this as a reason for saying to them "it is not beneficial" would that make sense?
(B) Although an effective protocol can be used to completely restructure an inefficient business or organization, the success of such a project depends heavily upon the willingness of the staff to accept new ideas and try different approaches to existing problems.
In other words, if staff don't want to accept new ideas, would that make the system not financially beneficial? The Top management conclusion is about money.
Also, imagine putting this piece of info in your argument. Would that make your conclusion stronger? Not really
(C)Patients who have experienced professional and compassionate service while receiving care at a hospital are likely to recommend that hospital to others, and may even be willing to make a donation for the continuation of such service.
If you put this piece of info in your argument, it will weaken your argument somehow and at the same time, will make the top management conclusion stronger (though it is a probability that patients will recommend and not certain)
(D) The bankruptcy of a hospital that in the past had suffered from legal problems caused by unprofessional patient handling as a result of being fully-occupied constantly was prevented due to the system's insight.
Legal problems are not our case here, we are here to discuss money benefits
(E)Whether covered by medical insurance or paid for privately by an individual, hospital services are extremely expensive primarily because of the high cost of their trained employment, and are charged for per day of hospitalization.
In other words, Regardless of the payment method, hospital services are extremely expensive because of training & are charged per day.
Let's put this in our argument
Your argument:(1) The hospital is never fully occupied (from the passage)
(2) Hospital training is extremely expensive
(3) Patients are charged per day
(4) the new system reduces the recovery time
___
(3) Therefore, it is not very financially beneficial (the opposite conclusion)
Fits perfect