Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Question 1
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
17% (02:35) correct
83%
(03:09) wrong
based on 730
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
54% (01:06) correct 46%
(01:15) wrong
based on 866
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
52% (01:33) correct 48%
(01:40) wrong
based on 842
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Morris is familiar as the Oscar-winning director of haunting, enigmatic documentary feature films. Yet running through all of Morris’ movies as an obsessive leitmotif, are questions, about the misleading nature of visual representation, the ethical shadows lurking in the margins of the picture frame or the movie still, the myriad ways in which we interpret images selectively to confirm our pre-existing biases.
Virtually never seen on-camera, Morris as an interviewer typically adopts an attitude that suggests a film noir detective or forensic scientist with a PhD in philosophy. He’s an erudite gumshoe, weighing the facts , now and then interjecting a wisecracking observation, always more intent on exposing his subjects’ (and the audience’s) blind spots than on arriving at comforting conclusions. Moral ambiguity is his métier, enlightened doubtfulness is his default mode.
In “Believing Is Seeing”, Morris again assumes his sphinx-like stance, posing endless riddles and rhetorical questions throughout the six thematically concentric essays that make up the book.
His opening chapter recounts the fascinating, long-running debate over whether the esteemed British photographer Roger Fenton artfully rearranged clusters of Russian cannon balls on a desolate road to create his famous, iconic shot of a Crimean War landscape. A Susan Sontag essay, asserting that Fenton did in fact stage this chilling vision of arbitrary death in April 1855, sets Morris’ restless mind in motion.
In the concluding essay, “Whose Father Is He?” Morris similarly revisits a long-ago visual crime scene, so to speak. This time it’s the Gettysburg battlefield of July 1863, where among the thousands of dead was an otherwise unidentifiable Union solider clutching in his hand an ambrotype of three young children. The story of the ensuing inquiry into the fallen patriot’s identity is a shaggy-dog tale with a gothic-horror twist.
So in a way are Morris’ probings of the stomach-churning acts committed by U. S. troops at Abu Ghraib. Although much of the material presented here was previously laid out in “Standard Operating Procedure,” Morris’ assertion, that the repellent photos of soldiers leering over an Iraqi corpse helped camouflage the crimes’ higher-ranking perpetrators, is an argument that warrants retelling – and national soul-searching.
At its core, though, “Believing is Seeing” is an elegantly conceived and ingeniously constructed work of cultural psycho-anthropology wrapped around a warning about the dangers of drawing inferences about the motives of photographers based on the split-second snapshots of life that they present to us. It’s also a cautionary lesson for navigating apparitions dancing before our eyes.
Virtually never seen on-camera, Morris as an interviewer typically adopts an attitude that suggests a film noir detective or forensic scientist with a PhD in philosophy. He’s an erudite gumshoe, weighing the facts , now and then interjecting a wisecracking observation, always more intent on exposing his subjects’ (and the audience’s) blind spots than on arriving at comforting conclusions. Moral ambiguity is his métier, enlightened doubtfulness is his default mode.
In “Believing Is Seeing”, Morris again assumes his sphinx-like stance, posing endless riddles and rhetorical questions throughout the six thematically concentric essays that make up the book.
His opening chapter recounts the fascinating, long-running debate over whether the esteemed British photographer Roger Fenton artfully rearranged clusters of Russian cannon balls on a desolate road to create his famous, iconic shot of a Crimean War landscape. A Susan Sontag essay, asserting that Fenton did in fact stage this chilling vision of arbitrary death in April 1855, sets Morris’ restless mind in motion.
In the concluding essay, “Whose Father Is He?” Morris similarly revisits a long-ago visual crime scene, so to speak. This time it’s the Gettysburg battlefield of July 1863, where among the thousands of dead was an otherwise unidentifiable Union solider clutching in his hand an ambrotype of three young children. The story of the ensuing inquiry into the fallen patriot’s identity is a shaggy-dog tale with a gothic-horror twist.
So in a way are Morris’ probings of the stomach-churning acts committed by U. S. troops at Abu Ghraib. Although much of the material presented here was previously laid out in “Standard Operating Procedure,” Morris’ assertion, that the repellent photos of soldiers leering over an Iraqi corpse helped camouflage the crimes’ higher-ranking perpetrators, is an argument that warrants retelling – and national soul-searching.
At its core, though, “Believing is Seeing” is an elegantly conceived and ingeniously constructed work of cultural psycho-anthropology wrapped around a warning about the dangers of drawing inferences about the motives of photographers based on the split-second snapshots of life that they present to us. It’s also a cautionary lesson for navigating apparitions dancing before our eyes.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
A) Summarize Morris’ exposition on the vindicative aspects of photographs.
B) make a case that photographs can draw at least as much from reality a fantasy.
C) consider a compelling challenge to the constructivist view of photography.
D) untangle the mysteries behind some of the world’s most iconic documentary photographs.
E) present an expose regarding manipulation of photographic evidence.
A) Summarize Morris’ exposition on the vindicative aspects of photographs.
B) make a case that photographs can draw at least as much from reality a fantasy.
C) consider a compelling challenge to the constructivist view of photography.
D) untangle the mysteries behind some of the world’s most iconic documentary photographs.
E) present an expose regarding manipulation of photographic evidence.
2. The author mentions "Susan Sontag" (Highlighted) primarily in order to
A) support Fenton’s Crimean photo-thesis.
B) corroborate Morris ‘argument on Fenton’s culpability.
C) investigate the controversy behind Fenton’s iconic photo.
D) provide another example of photo-journalism.
E) Suggest that she is a Fenton scholar.
A) support Fenton’s Crimean photo-thesis.
B) corroborate Morris ‘argument on Fenton’s culpability.
C) investigate the controversy behind Fenton’s iconic photo.
D) provide another example of photo-journalism.
E) Suggest that she is a Fenton scholar.
3. Which of the following most accurately describes Morris’ opinion of the Abu Gharib crimes?
A) The photograph could serve as both an expose, and as a cover-up.
B) The photograph exposes wrong doing up the entire chain of command.
C) The photograph reveals prisoner-abuse far beyond the scope of the “Standard Operating Procedure”.
D) The photograph functioned as a clinical autopsy of criminal misconduct.
E) The photographs in question imply that different protocols of war apply for problematic nations.
A) The photograph could serve as both an expose, and as a cover-up.
B) The photograph exposes wrong doing up the entire chain of command.
C) The photograph reveals prisoner-abuse far beyond the scope of the “Standard Operating Procedure”.
D) The photograph functioned as a clinical autopsy of criminal misconduct.
E) The photographs in question imply that different protocols of war apply for problematic nations.
MikeScarn
Current Student
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 01 Jun 2025
Posts: 275
Given Kudos: 227
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
Schools: Tuck '24 (WA) Harvard '24 (D) Kellogg '24 (WA) Wharton '24 (D) Haas '24 (D) Sloan '24 (D) Fuqua '24 (D) Booth '24 (M) Yale '24 (A$)
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.62
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
Schools: Tuck '24 (WA) Harvard '24 (D) Kellogg '24 (WA) Wharton '24 (D) Haas '24 (D) Sloan '24 (D) Fuqua '24 (D) Booth '24 (M) Yale '24 (A$)
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 275
10 Mar 2019, 14:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
Yikes, this one has some tough language.
vindicative, adjective: "having or showing a strong or unreasoning desire for revenge."
constructivist, adjective: "relating to or denoting a style in which mechanical objects are combined into abstract mobile forms."
vindicative, adjective: "having or showing a strong or unreasoning desire for revenge."
constructivist, adjective: "relating to or denoting a style in which mechanical objects are combined into abstract mobile forms."
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
General Discussion
GittinGud
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Mar 2021
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
Schools: Ross '22 (A) Johnson '22 (A$) Anderson '22 (A$) Marshall '22 (A) Kenan-Flagler '22 (A$) Mendoza '22 (A$)
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Schools: Ross '22 (A) Johnson '22 (A$) Anderson '22 (A$) Marshall '22 (A) Kenan-Flagler '22 (A$) Mendoza '22 (A$)
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Posts: 94
Kudos:
33
21 Feb 2019, 06:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
Can someone please help me with Q1? I don't know how to approach that. Thanks!
