Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 14:10 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 14:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,062
 [24]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,062
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,062
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
c93liu
Joined: 30 Aug 2020
Last visit: 13 Nov 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
93
 [4]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.81
Products:
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V42 (Online)
Posts: 21
Kudos: 93
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Vjajo
Joined: 06 Apr 2019
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
54
 [3]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Posts: 21
Kudos: 54
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to the question, we need to find whether 1/n > 2/31?

Statement 1:
n*(n-1)/(n*n) > 5/6
=> n > 6
Here n could be 7 where the probability of getting an 8 is 0
n could also be 8 or above where the probability cannot be calculated unless we know the value of n.
Hence insufficient.

Statement 2:
1/n > 1/8
=> n < 8
Here since n < 8, the probability of getting an 8 is 0 which is < 2/31.
Hence we get the answer as no.
Option 2 is sufficient hence answer is B.
User avatar
Dipsy06
Joined: 20 Nov 2022
Last visit: 21 Dec 2024
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bunuel
An n-sided fair die has sides labeled with the numbers 1 through n, inclusive, where n > 3. If the die is rolled once, is the probability of rolling a "8" greater than 2/31 ?

(1) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are different is greater than 5/6.

(1) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are equal is greater than 1/8.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $40,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


Official Solution:


An \(n\)-sided fair die has sides labeled with the numbers 1 through \(n\), inclusive, where \(n > 3\). If the die is rolled once, is the probability of rolling a "8" greater than \(\frac{2}{31}\) ?

The probability of rolling a "8" when rolling an \(n\)-sided die is \(\frac{1}{n}\), provided \(n\) is greater than or equal to 8 (if \(n < 8\), then the probability of rolling a "8" will be 0). So, the question asks whether \(\frac{1}{n} > \frac{2}{31}\), (which translates into \(n < 15.5\)) AND \(n > 7\). Thus the question became: is \(7 < n < 15.5\)

(1) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are different is greater than \(\frac{5}{6}\).

\(P(two \ different \ numbers) = 1 - P(two \ same \ numbers)=1-1*\frac{1}{n}\). So, we are told that \(1-\frac{1}{n} > \frac{5}{6}\):

\(1-\frac{1}{n} > \frac{5}{6}\);

\(\frac{1}{6} > \frac{1}{n} \);

\(n>6\) (since \(n\) is positive).

If \(n=7\), then the probability of rolling a "8" is 0, so less than \(\frac{2}{31}\).

If \(8 \leq n \leq 15\), then the probability of rolling a "8" will be more than \(\frac{2}{31}\).

And if \(n > 15\), then the probability of rolling a "8" will be less than \(\frac{2}{31}\).

Not sufficient.

(2) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are equal is greater than \(\frac{1}{8}\).

\(P(two \ equal \ numbers)=n*\frac{1}{n}*\frac{1}{n}=\frac{1}{n} > \frac{1}{8}\). This leads to \(n < 8\). Therefore, the probability of rolling a "8" is 0. Sufficient.


Answer: B

Could you please explain the Statement-2 of this question?
I am unable to get the clarity on this (n*1/n*1/n)?
The probability of getting a number from "n" no.s is (1/n). So , the probability of getting the same number twice is (1/n^2).So in the formula from where this extra "n" is arriving?

Thank you in advance

[b]Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,062
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,062
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dipsy06
Bunuel
Bunuel
An n-sided fair die has sides labeled with the numbers 1 through n, inclusive, where n > 3. If the die is rolled once, is the probability of rolling a "8" greater than 2/31 ?

(1) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are different is greater than 5/6.

(1) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are equal is greater than 1/8.



 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $40,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


Official Solution:


An \(n\)-sided fair die has sides labeled with the numbers 1 through \(n\), inclusive, where \(n > 3\). If the die is rolled once, is the probability of rolling a "8" greater than \(\frac{2}{31}\) ?

The probability of rolling a "8" when rolling an \(n\)-sided die is \(\frac{1}{n}\), provided \(n\) is greater than or equal to 8 (if \(n < 8\), then the probability of rolling a "8" will be 0). So, the question asks whether \(\frac{1}{n} > \frac{2}{31}\), (which translates into \(n < 15.5\)) AND \(n > 7\). Thus the question became: is \(7 < n < 15.5\)

(1) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are different is greater than \(\frac{5}{6}\).

\(P(two \ different \ numbers) = 1 - P(two \ same \ numbers)=1-1*\frac{1}{n}\). So, we are told that \(1-\frac{1}{n} > \frac{5}{6}\):

\(1-\frac{1}{n} > \frac{5}{6}\);

\(\frac{1}{6} > \frac{1}{n} \);

\(n>6\) (since \(n\) is positive).

If \(n=7\), then the probability of rolling a "8" is 0, so less than \(\frac{2}{31}\).

If \(8 \leq n \leq 15\), then the probability of rolling a "8" will be more than \(\frac{2}{31}\).

And if \(n > 15\), then the probability of rolling a "8" will be less than \(\frac{2}{31}\).

Not sufficient.

(2) If the die is rolled twice, the probability that the numbers obtained are equal is greater than \(\frac{1}{8}\).

\(P(two \ equal \ numbers)=n*\frac{1}{n}*\frac{1}{n}=\frac{1}{n} > \frac{1}{8}\). This leads to \(n < 8\). Therefore, the probability of rolling a "8" is 0. Sufficient.


Answer: B

Could you please explain the Statement-2 of this question?
I am unable to get the clarity on this (n*1/n*1/n)?
The probability of getting a number from "n" no.s is (1/n). So , the probability of getting the same number twice is (1/n^2).So in the formula from where this extra "n" is arriving?

Thank you in advance

[b]Posted from my mobile device

When rolled twice, what is the probability that the numbers obtained are equal to 1? It's 1/n*1/n, right?
When rolled twice, what is the probability that the numbers obtained are equal to 2? It's 1/n*1/n, again.
When rolled twice, what is the probability that the numbers obtained are equal to 3? It's 1/n*1/n, again.
...
When rolled twice, what is the probability that the numbers obtained are equal to n? It's 1/n*1/n, again.

So, when rolled twice, what is the probability that the numbers obtained are equal ? It's the sum of the above: 1/n*1/n, n times, which is n*1/n*1/n.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
mysterymanrog
User avatar
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Jan 2022
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 794
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 559
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 794
Kudos: 710
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Came Across this beautiful questions, kudos Bunuel

1) Given that the probability of rolling two separate numbers is greater than 5/6, we can construct the following equation:

\(1*\frac{(n-1)}{n}>\frac{5}{6}\) where n is the number of sides.
\(6n-6>5n\) We are able to multiply because n>3>0
\(n>6\)
This means we have more than 6 numbers on our dice.
If n=7, then p(8)=0, as 8 is not an option. But if n=8, p(8)=1/8 which is greater than 2/31.
NS.

2) Given this we can construct:
\(1*\frac{1}{n}>\frac{1}{8}\) where n is the number of sides.
\(n<8\)
Since n has less than 8 sides, p(8) will be 0 for all the cases, which is less than 2/31. Suff.

B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,586
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,586
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts