Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 03:20 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 03:20
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
emmak
Joined: 09 Feb 2013
Last visit: 08 Jul 2014
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
4,855
 [35]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 103
Kudos: 4,855
 [35]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 864
Own Kudos:
8,939
 [9]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 864
Kudos: 8,939
 [9]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Cadaver
Joined: 03 Oct 2014
Last visit: 09 Oct 2018
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 114
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
DesiGmat
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Last visit: 06 Feb 2021
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
237
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Posts: 173
Kudos: 237
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Though I picked the correct answer.

I have a doubt (may be because of over reading the same sentence).

Can we parallel chip and expand in option C?

Why can't we consider "The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to" an initial non-parallel part?

To elaborate....

The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries

and

The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to expand the immigrants’ earnings in the United States.

I know we can also eliminate C based on the usage of apostrophe "immigrants’ earnings" because "the earnings of immigrants in the United States" is more precise than "immigrants’ earnings in the United States"

please respond
User avatar
aniteshgmat1101
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Last visit: 16 Aug 2016
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
130
 [2]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 108
Kudos: 130
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
emmak
The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
A)far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
B)far reaching, economic experts say, as it is providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expand the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
C)far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty and expand the immigrants’ earnings in the United States.
D)far reaching, economic experts say, by providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries while it expands the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
E)far reaching, economic experts say, in that they provide a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries, expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

I am confused. When we remove extra information from a sentence, shouldn`t we remove it with comma?
Here "economic experts say" is an extra information, and if we remove it from sentence with the commas associated, then the Verb+ing modifier (providing) has no comma left.
Realy need help, Please reply...
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 426
Kudos: 447
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My meaning analysis
The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say,
providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and
expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States

A is correct- no error
B Parallelism - expand and providing. Moreover pronoun IT is not having a correct antecedent.
C other countries is missing changing the meaning as if the poverty is removed in only US.
D Pronoun error IT.
E Changes meaning as if expanding is done so as to provide. :) .
avatar
egghead2017
Joined: 07 Mar 2017
Last visit: 27 May 2018
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 366
Posts: 11
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

Two adverbial modifiers are parallel - Answer A
avatar
jafy
Joined: 12 Sep 2017
Last visit: 17 Jan 2019
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say,
This is original sentence & my doubt is here two I.P clause join just by comma . all the five option are same .
plz expert advice where i miss concept .
avatar
Tamao411284
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Last visit: 05 Dec 2018
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
26
 [2]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 18
Kudos: 26
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aniteshgmat1101
emmak
The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
A)far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
B)far reaching, economic experts say, as it is providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expand the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
C)far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty and expand the immigrants’ earnings in the United States.
D)far reaching, economic experts say, by providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries while it expands the earnings of immigrants in the United States.
E)far reaching, economic experts say, in that they provide a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries, expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

I am confused. When we remove extra information from a sentence, shouldn`t we remove it with comma?
Here "economic experts say" is an extra information, and if we remove it from sentence with the commas associated, then the Verb+ing modifier (providing) has no comma left.
Realy need help, Please reply...


Hi,

Please try to make your understanding as simple as possible. Here the main subject is "The benefits". The benefits are far reaching , [HOW] 1. Providing a powerful.. and 2. Expanding...
these are two ing modifiers which should point to the subject of main clause to provide the extra information.
B : it incorrect subject reference.
C : Changes the meaning ( new subject vehicle, verbs chip and expand).
D : while introduces simultaneous actions so debilitating the meaning. it (refers to the vehicle again.)
E : we need to join two ideas referring to a subject with and/aswell as/and also, due to which the construction is ambiguous.
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 348
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 348
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why in (C), "expand" be parallel to "chip away", still seems to make sense by telling the advantages of the policies?
avatar
gauranggarg
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Last visit: 07 Nov 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 23
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I also marked C, but then realised later that it changes the meaning. This option removes key words "in other nations" after chip away at poverty. I think this changes the meaning and hence means that this option is wrong.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 907
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 431
Location: United States
Posts: 907
Kudos: 323
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

(A) far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States

(B) far reaching, economic experts say, as it is providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expand the earnings of immigrants in the United States

-- 'benefits' is plural

(C) far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty and expand the immigrants’ earnings in the United States

-- 'expand' is not parallel to 'providing'

(D) far reaching, economic experts say, by providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries while it expands the earnings of immigrants in the United States

-- 'benefits' is plural

(E) far reaching, economic experts say, in that they provide a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries, expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States

-- Parallelism issue.

Answer is A.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,162
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,162
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I see the parallelism in a, but can one argue that this is a parallelism trap? i.e. providing and expanding modify the economic experts? I am not a fan of their placement here.
User avatar
abhishekmayank
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 198
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Although option A has been marked as correct sentence, but the adverbial modifier "providing" and "expanding" don't make sense with the subject of the sentence, "benefits". It is the "policies" and not the "benefits" that are "providing a powerful vehicle.." and "expanding the earnings.."

A. The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

Whenever an ing-modifier is separated out of the main clause by comma, then subject of the main clause should make sense with the ing-modifier.
Whether "Benefits" are "providing" a powerful vehicle or "expanding" the earnings? Clearly no. Instead, providing a powerful vehicle or expanding the earnings themselves are benefits.

Expert kindly help ...
User avatar
abhishekmayank
Joined: 26 Apr 2016
Last visit: 28 Jan 2024
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 198
Kudos: 61
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not satisfied with either the question or its explanations :

Option A :

The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

When ing-modifier is separated by the main clause by comma, then subject should make sense with the modifier.
Whether "Benefits" are "providing" powerful vehicle or "expanding" the earnings ? Clearly no. Instead, providing vehicle and expanding the earnings themselves are benefits.

Experts, kindly help
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,216
Kudos: 6,177
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhishekmayank
Not satisfied with either the question or its explanations :

Option A :

The benefits of the new policies are far reaching, economic experts say, providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

When ing-modifier is separated by the main clause by comma, then subject should make sense with the modifier.
Whether "Benefits" are "providing" powerful vehicle or "expanding" the earnings ? Clearly no. Instead, providing vehicle and expanding the earnings themselves are benefits.

Experts, kindly help


Hello abhishekmayank,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, the intended meaning here is, indeed, that the benefits of the new policies are far reaching, and as a result, these benefits are providing a powerful vehicle to chip away at poverty in other countries and expanding the earnings of immigrants in the United States.

The logic here is that the policies produce certain benefits, and these benefits take two further actions - a perfectly logical meaning.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts