Most civil libertarians favor the repeal of laws against “victimless crimes,” a category generally taken to include prostitution, gambling, homosexuality, and drug abuse. Yet it is unclear whether drug abuse can truly be classified as victimless crime. Even aside from the vast numbers of crimes such as robbery and burglary attributed to drug addicts, which are distinct from the crime of drug abuse, the addiction itself causes great suffering to persons other than the addict. For example, those who care for the addict – his parents, spouse, children, and friends – undoubtedly suffer vicariously as they witness the degeneration and death of the addict. In this respect, drug abuse can scarcely be considered a victimless crime.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) Both prostitution and gambling can also cause vicarious suffering among those close to the person committing the crime.
(B) Drug abuse differs from other crimes in that it is a medical problem as well as a legal and social problem.
(C) Those who are affected vicariously by a crime cannot strictly be described as victims of the crime.
(D) Not all civil liberties agree that all laws related to victimless crimes should be repealed.
(E) Experience shows that attempts to control drug abuse through criminal law have generally been unsuccessful.
Source: LSAT - Harcourt Brace - I/II/#5