In many surveys, American consumers have expressed a willingness
to spend up to 10 percent more for products that are ecologically sound. Encouraged by such surveys, Bleach-O Corporation promoted a new laundry detergent, Bleach-O Green, as safer for the environment. Bleach-O Green cost 5 percent more than typical detergents. After one year, Bleach-O Green had failed to capture a significant share of the detergent market and was withdrawn from sale.
Which of the following questions is LEAST likely to be relevant in determining the reasons for the failure of Bleach-O Green?
(A) How effective as a detergent was Bleach-O Green?-
Relevant. Whether product is working properly in the sense that main purpose is fulfilled or not. If detergent is not effective in washing clothes, then it will be one of the reasons to fail.(B) How many other detergents on the market were promoted as safe for the environment?-
Relevant. If other detergents in the competitive market are there then they might as well have huge market share or competitive edge than the Bleach O Green.(C) How much more did Bleach-O Green cost to manufacture than ordinary detergents?-
Irrelevant. Already mentioned in the question, as per the survey, consumers are willing to spend 10% higher for ecological products. And, it is mentioned that the product is only 5% higher. So, failing because of price point doesn't make sence.(D) To what extent did consumers accept the validity of Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?
- Relevant. If company is able to market its product to target consumers or not. If not, then it is bound to fail.
(E) How effectively was Bleach-O Green advertised and promoted to consumers?
- Relevant. Same as point D.