Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers

Question

Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,  Phyllis Marcuccio, editor of  Science and Children , projects that within the next five years the number of science and mathematics teachers in the United States will have fallen by 35 percent.

(A) Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,
(B) Last year science and mathematics teachers were reduced by 4 percent, and on this basis
(C) On the basis of science and mathematics teachers being reduced by 4 percent over the past year
(D) On the basis of a 4 percent reduction in the number of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,
(E) Based on last year's 4 percent reduction of the number of science and mathematics teachers,

jaisonsunny77 · Accepted Answer

Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,  Phyllis Marcuccio, editor of Science and Children, projects that within the next five years the number of science and mathematics teachers in the United States will have fallen by 35 percent. 
 
(A) Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,  -  (A) implies that the science and math teachers themselves were reduced. How can you reduce a person?  
(B) Last year science and mathematics teachers were reduced by 4 percent, and on this basis  -  (B) implies that the science and math teachers themselves were reduced. How can you reduce a person?  
(C) On the basis of science and mathematics teachers being reduced by 4 percent over the past year  -  (C) implies that the science and math teachers themselves were reduced. How can you reduce a person? 
(D) On the basis of a 4 percent reduction in the number of science and mathematics teachers over the past year, - has no error. hence,   (D) is the right answer choice.    
(E) Based on last year's 4 percent reduction of the number of science and mathematics teachers,  -  (E) implies that Phyllis Marcuccio himself is based on the 4 % reduction; this implication does not make any sense.

Harsh9676 · Answer

My Analysis:

A. Modofier error - Phyllis is not based on 4% reduction. He used 4% reduction as a basis to predict something.
B. The passive construction gives a meaning that something reduced the number of teachers but that's not the intended meaning.
C. Same as B
D. Correct
E. Same as A

Thanks 
Harsh

Posted from my mobile device

techloverforever · Answer

reduction of - incorrect idiom usage.
Reduction in - correct usage as used in option D.

POE:
(A) Based on the 4 percent  reduction of  science and mathematics teachers over the past year, --> Incorrect as mentioned above.
(B) Last year science and mathematics teachers were reduced by 4 percent, and on  this  basis
(C) On the basis of science and mathematics teachers  being reduced  by 4 percent over the past year
(D) On the basis of a 4 percent  reduction in  the number of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,
(E) Based on last year's 4 percent  reduction of  the number of science and mathematics teachers,

Debo1988 · Answer

GMATNinja   VeritasKarishma   mikemcgarry

For option A, the official explanations says : 
"A. Some would argue that  based on … year  is an adjectival phrase modifying the noun Phyllis Marcuccio and is therefore incorrect in this context.  But current well-established usage allows this phrase to be treated as adverbial, modifying the verb  projects  . More significant issues arise in the phrase  reduction of … teachers.. "

I always thought such an expression is a case of misplaced modifier :
 Based on  the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,  Phyllis Marcuccio  projects that within the next five years...

It doesn't make sense to say that Phyllis Marcuccio is  based  on something (4 percent reduction).

The official explanation, however, seems to imply that such uses could be grammatically correct.

Can you please throw some light?

Cheers!
Debo

pratyush86 · Answer

A,B and C are out as we can reduce the number and not the teachers themselves.

out of D and E - D is a better choice.

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

That is well established usage of "based on," and I personally have always wondered whether the GMAT would consider it correct in some instances.

Now, here's the thing, I think that structures like that one are not always correct. There's the convention, and there's going too far. Consider the following examples:

Based on the satellite images, it will rain tomorrow.

Based on the data, the trains have been running on time more consistently.

OK, those do not involve the convention to which the above explanation refers.

Neither "it" nor "will rain" are based on anything.

Neither "trains" nor "have been running" are based on anything.

I think the convention works more like what we see in the following example:

Based on the study results, she concluded that the bacterium had mutated.

The sentence does not really make sense, but "concluded ... based on" is sort of like "she based her conclusion on." So, people say "based on, she concluded," and the GMAT has decided to go with it as correct.

That said, I would not be 100 percent surprised if the test went so far as to say that a sentence like the "based on ..., it will rain" or the "based on ..., the trains have been running" is correct. People do use sentences like those, even if they are even more illogical than "based on ..., she concluded.

The key thing to understand is that anything conventional can show up as correct in a Sentence Correction question, even if past Sentence Correction questions seem to have considered that conventional structure incorrect.

Sentence Correction evolves.

Kali123 · Answer

Need a better explanation of why option a) is incorrect. Phyllis's projection is based on the reduction in.......?

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Here's (A).

(A) Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,

Notice that this choice does not say "reduction in the number of ... teachers."

It says "reduction of ... teachers."

That conveys the nonsensical meaning that the teachers themselves were reduced, as in shrunk.

Shrey08 · Answer

Hi MartyTargetTestPrep Are there any other obvious errors based on which, we can confidently eliminate answer option 'E'

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Because "Based on last year's 4 percent reduction  of  the number of ... teachers" uses "of" rather than "in," this version suggests that "last year" engaged in a "reduction of" the number of teachers. Of course, this meaning is nonsensical.

ChiranjeevSingh · Answer

Here's the   official explanation   provided by the GMAC for this question:
 
The given sentence reports that the editor of  Science and Children  projects a drop of 35 percent in the number of science and mathematics teachers within five years, a projection based on a 4 percent reduction seen last year. Points to consider include the following: Is the modifying phrase  based on … year  grammatically correct in this context? Is the preposition  of  with the noun  reduction  a correct usage? Is  reduction … of teachers  correct diction?
 
 Option A:  Some would argue that  based on … year  is an adjectival phrase modifying the noun  Phyllis Marcuccio  and is therefore incorrect in this context. But current well-established usage allows this phrase to be treated as adverbial, modifying the verb  projects.  More significant issues arise in the phrase  reduction of … teachers.  The compressed phrasing permits absurd but unintended readings, whereas the intended reading is surely  a reduction in the number of … teachers.

Option B:  Does  teachers were reduced by 4   percent  mean that the teachers diminished in stature or status? What is surely be intended is that the number of such teachers decreased, not that the teachers themselves were somehow reduced.

Option C:  The phrasing  science and mathematics teachers being reduced … year  is unnecessarily awkward, wordy, and confusing, failing to convey clearly that the reduction applies to the  number  of teachers.

Option D:  Correct. The phrasing  reduction in the number of … teachers  is correct. The phrase  on the basis of  …  year  is a grammatically and rhetorically appropriate adverbial modifier of the verb  projects.

Option E:  The preposition  of  is incorrect with  reduction;  the correct preposition is  in . Some would argue that  based on … year  is an adjectival phrase modifying the noun  Phyllis Marcuccio  and is therefore incorrect in this context. But current well-established usage allows this phrase to be treated as adverbial, modifying the verb  projects. 
 
The correct answer is D.

Please note that I'm not the author of this explanation. I'm just posting it here since I believe it can help the community.

alwaysHP · Answer

GMATNinja   VeritasKarishma

In few questions the options with Based on are usually eliminated because it wrongly modifies noun and it has a meaning error. Here On the basis of also have a similar meaning wrongly modifying noun. Can you please explain me why On the basis is correct in this case.

thangvietnam · Answer

regarding choice C. 
"on basis of" can go with a noun to make combination "on basis of +noun"
but not all noun can be in this combination. depending on meaning of the noun, the noun can or can not be in this combination.
"on basis of the reduction" is logical
"on basis of existence of this kind" is logical
"on basis of the teachers" is not logical. this is choice C
so, the noun in the combination should show an action, state or phenominon. the noun can not be a physical entity.

EducationAisle · Answer

Hi  manvig ,  based on...  is (what's called) a  participial phrase . Since participial phrases act as  adjectives , they modify the  noun .

On the other hand,  on the basis of....  is a  prepositional  phrase (well, because it starts with a preposition  on ). When a prepositional phrase appears at the beginning of a clause/sentence, it generally acts as an  adverbial  modifier. Because this prepositional phrase acts as an adverbial modifier, this prepositional phrase modifies the  verb  (and not the noun) of the clause that follows this prepositional phrase (why? Because adverbs modify  verbs ).

Hence, in the correct option (D), the prepositional phrase modifies the verb  projects  and the prepositional phrase answers the question:  How/why  does Phyllis Marcuccio project a fall in science and mathematics teachers (remember that Adverbs typically answer the question  how, when, where, why,  and  how much ).

p.s. Our book    EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana    discusses  prepositional phrase modifiers , their application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.

dave13 · Answer

googled " reduction of " and it is mentioned here

https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00377 why "reduction of" is incorrect ?

Basshead · Answer

Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,  Phyllis Marcuccio, editor of  Science and Children , projects that within the next five years the number of science and mathematics teachers in the United States will have fallen by 35 percent.

(A) Based on the  4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers  over the past year,

-- 4% in physical size?! Not the intended meaning.

(B) Last year science and mathematics teachers were reduced  by 4 percent , and on this basis

-- 4% in physical size?! Not the intended meaning.

(C) On the basis of science and mathematics teachers  being  reduced by 4 percent over the past year

-- 'being' is incorrect here.

(D)  On the basis of a 4 percent reduction in the number of science and mathematics teachers over the past year,

-- Looks good. Keep.

(E) Based on last year's 4 percent reduction  of  the number of science and mathematics teachers,

-- should be 'last year's 4 percent reduction in the number of'

Answer is D.

pratyush86 · Answer

A,B and C are out as we can reduce the number and not the teachers themselves.

out of D and E - D is a better choice due to the meaning clarity.

E should have - reduction in and not reduction of.

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Based on the 4 percent reduction of science and mathematics teachers

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards