Came in close to a minute. This one wasn't so bad. I guess trying to relate this to the real world helps. Anyway the gist of all this is that a marathon is 2 hours long, but for some reason those whose daily practice is less than this do better on an actual marathon.
Although marathons are 26.2 miles (42.2 kilometers) long and take even world-class marathoners over 2 hours to run, athletes who train by running 90 minutes a day fare better in marathons than do those who train by running 120 minutes or more a day.
Each of the following, if true, contributes to an explanation of the difference in marathon performances described above EXCEPT:
Edit: A, C, D, and E all help explain why we have this kind of paradox in the passage. (B) does not.
(A) The longer the period of time that one runs daily, the greater the chances of suffering adverse health effects due to air pollution.
Longer period is shown to increase the chances of suffering adverse health effects, so this would mean less chance of doing well by an actual marathon date if you are practicing for longer period daily.
(B) The longer the period of time that one runs daily, the easier it is to adjust to different race lengths.
Nope. This seems to be an advantage of longer training periods. (Edit: Correct answer choice)
(C) The longer the run, the more frequent is the occurrence of joint injuries that significantly interfere with overall training.
Explains why a runner may not be in peak condition by an actual marathon date.
(D) Runners who train over 90 minutes per day grow bored with running and become less motivated.
Explains why a runner may not perform as well on an actual marathon.
(E) Runners who train over 90 minutes per day deplete certain biochemical energy reserves, leaving them less energy for marathons.
Explains why training less helps on an actual marathon.