Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 01:54 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 01:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,339
 [9]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,339
 [9]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rsama
Joined: 04 Oct 2019
Last visit: 03 Dec 2022
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: India
Schools: XLRI
Schools: XLRI
Posts: 23
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 343
Own Kudos:
49
 [4]
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 343
Kudos: 49
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 02 Mar 2026
Posts: 389
Own Kudos:
1,468
 [1]
Given Kudos: 304
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mavisdu1017
rsama
A, B, C, and D all are irrelevant to conclusion made in argument. Thus POE confirms E.
Yes same here. But honestly I feel E is bullshit and nonsense, how does it strengthen the argument? Just seems to repeat the fossil...
Anybody can explain?

Hi,
I'll try to explain my logic-
The argument talks only about an ink-sac, that was 'probably' a squid's. The conclusion gives a generalisation that marine animals would have had ink sacs but nowhere does the argument 'confirm' that the ink-sac belonged to a marine animal.
Option E mentions that a squid's remains were also found around the same area and these remains appear to be from the Jurassic period. This further strengthens my belief that the ink-sac found was of the squid that is estimated to be from the J period so yes, I can conclude with more confidence that this ink sac phenom is at least 155 years old (from the J period).
User avatar
Yudhajit22
Joined: 21 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Posts: 17
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the conclusion is more about the time for which this kind of self preservation exists i.e , for 155 M years.

Only E provides some sort of support to that and hence strengthens.
User avatar
RenanBragion
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 01 Jun 2020
Last visit: 14 Oct 2025
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V46
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V46
Posts: 130
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Ink-sacs in marine organisms have functions other than self-preservatio - weakens the argument because if these organisms were used for other functions c maybe they weren’t used back then for self preservation

(B) The Belemnotheutis Antiquus had physiological features that exist only as inactive organs in some present-day species of squid. - irrelevant, the fact that some physiological features from back then are inactive today does not directly support the claim that the organs were used for self-preservation back then

(C) Marine organisms other than squids also have epidermal ink-sacs that the organisms use to ward off predators.- irrelevant again

(D) Fossils found in the Wiltshire region have previously provided evidence that land-based organisms from the Jurassic period had epidermal organs with the function of self-preservation. - irrelevant because the argument calls out specifically that the organs were used for self preservation by marine animals, so whatever happens on land does not support the argument directly

(E) Remains of a squid belonging to the Belemnotheutis Antiquus family were also found in the Wiltshire region and estimated to be from the Jurassic period - this helps triangulate that the fossils were indeed from that time period. I personally find it a weak support, but support nonetheless
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts