Let's analyze each statement to determine if it provides sufficient information to find Train A's average speed during the journey from Liverpool to London.
Given Information:
- Distance from Liverpool to London is 300 kilometers.
- Train A reached London when Train B had 80 kilometers left to cover.
- Therefore, Train B had traveled 300 - 80 = 220 kilometers when Train A reached London.
Question:
What was Train A's average speed during this journey?
Analyzing the Statements:
Statement (1):
During the first hour, Train B covered 40 kilometers less than Train A.
Let v_A be Train A's average speed, and v_B be Train B's average speed.
From the information given:
- When Train A reached London, Train B had 80 kilometers left, meaning Train B had traveled 220 kilometers.
- This means that Train B's travel time is the same as Train A's travel time since they departed simultaneously.
From Statement (1):
- If Train A's speed is v_A, it covered v_A kilometers in the first hour.
- Train B covered v_A - 40 kilometers in the first hour.
However, this statement alone does not provide enough information to determine v_A directly. We need more data to link v_A and v_B over the entire journey.
Statement (2):
Train B's average speed for the first 110 kilometers was 110 kilometers per hour.
From Statement (2):
- Train B's average speed for the first 110 kilometers is 110 kilometers per hour.
- This gives us information about Train B's initial speed but not enough about Train B's overall average speed or Train A's speed over the entire journey.
Combining Both Statements:
If we combine both statements:
- From Statement (1), we know Train B's initial speed relative to Train A's initial speed.
- From Statement (2), we know Train B's speed for the first 110 kilometers.
However, combining both statements still does not provide a direct relationship between Train A's overall average speed and the given data points. We do not have a clear link between the entire journey of Train B and its average speed.
IMO E.