Last visit was: 09 Jul 2025, 18:28 It is currently 09 Jul 2025, 18:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
aaba
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
1,018
 [32]
Given Kudos: 332
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Posts: 165
Kudos: 1,018
 [32]
Kudos
Add Kudos
31
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 21 Apr 2025
Posts: 5,965
Own Kudos:
5,154
 [3]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,965
Kudos: 5,154
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pkshankar
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Last visit: 25 Apr 2019
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
Posts: 64
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
azhrhasan
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Last visit: 13 Sep 2024
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Location: Canada
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:General Management (Retail: E-commerce)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Posts: 122
Kudos: 164
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aaba
Toxic bioaccumulation, a mining hazard induced by the mercury compounds transferred from unrefined cinnabar ore, presently afflicts 7 of every 10 workers in the Redstone Mine. A second mineral which occurs in the same environment, chalcedony, restricts the release of toxins from cinnabar ore. Mining chemists suggest spreading chalcedony in the Redstone Mine in order to preserve the surviving workers.

Which of the following, if true about chalcedony, provides the strongest evidence that the suggestion will be successful?

A It accumulates in deposits which are concentrated in the mineral veins where cinnabar is found.

B It can on some occasions stay inactive in mineral veins for almost five years before it begins to spread.

C It spreads through an environment more gradually than does cinnabar in most geological settings.

D It does not prevent a few common varieties of cinnabar ore from releasing toxins.

E It can occasionally damage fish populations by poisoning their gills.

Conclusion: spreading chalcedony in the Redstone Mine in order to preserve the surviving workers will be successful. We need find an strengthner.

Need to keep a note here that the argument is talking about surviving members. This means chalcedony must be spread after the leak is done.
This means we need to find an answer which is very effective to contain the disaster but ineffective to prevent it from happening.

Let's look at the options.

A: contender. strong indeed
B: contender. weak one because It will still have issues after 5 years
C: irrelevant
D: contender. weak one because it is not applicable in all cases
E: irrelevant

IMO A is a great choice to go with.
User avatar
himadeepm
Joined: 28 Aug 2018
Last visit: 07 Dec 2020
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
GRE 1: Q165 V153
GPA: 3.51
Products:
GRE 1: Q165 V153
Posts: 35
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pkshankar
This is straight A, let us take a look at the options:

B - weakens by stating that chalcedony stays inactive for 5 years i.e. it does not prevent the release of harmful chemicals for this period. We are looking for a choice that lends more credence to the fact that spreading chalcedony in that area would save the workers there.

C - if anything this weakens the conclusion by stating that chalcedony takes more time to spread and hence be effective.

D - this clearly weakens by stating that it does not prevent a few chalcedony varieties from releasing toxins hence workers could still be afflicted.

E - states a negative aspect of chalcedony but we are looking for an answer choice that would compel us to use chalcedony in that area.

A - is the answer as it strengthens the conclusion by strengthening the assumption that the author.

The answer could be arrived at through more flexible approach. Cause(introducing chalcedony) ->effect(reducing mercury leak)
Answer choice A strengthens the view that indeed cause causes effect
User avatar
ShankSouljaBoi
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Apr 2024
Posts: 622
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,090
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am not able to decipher the argument at all.
Does it mean Chalcedony needs to be sprinkled like pesticide. Could you please take up this one ? VeritasKarishma
avatar
YASH750
Joined: 05 Feb 2020
Last visit: 02 Dec 2020
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 47
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still can't understand how A is correct.

The argument says Chalcedony needs to be spread to stop bioaccumulation. If Chalcedony already occurs near cinnabar ore , what is the need to spread it anyways , it should arrest bioaccumulation by default right?

Option C makes more sense to me because is gives a reason why Chalcedony needs to be spread..

what am i missing here?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 09 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,229
 [3]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,229
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aaba
Toxic bioaccumulation, a mining hazard induced by the mercury compounds transferred from unrefined cinnabar ore, presently afflicts 7 of every 10 workers in the Redstone Mine. A second mineral which occurs in the same environment, chalcedony, restricts the release of toxins from cinnabar ore. Mining chemists suggest spreading chalcedony in the Redstone Mine in order to preserve the surviving workers.

Which of the following, if true about chalcedony, provides the strongest evidence that the suggestion will be successful?

A It accumulates in deposits which are concentrated in the mineral veins where cinnabar is found.

B It can on some occasions stay inactive in mineral veins for almost five years before it begins to spread.

C It spreads through an environment more gradually than does cinnabar in most geological settings.

D It does not prevent a few common varieties of cinnabar ore from releasing toxins.

E It can occasionally damage fish populations by poisoning their gills.

What is the source of this CR? Doesn't look like an official question. The options are somewhat ambiguous and not easy to comprehend.

Premises:

- Toxins from unrefined cinnabar ore presently afflict 7 of every 10 workers in the Redstone Mine.
- A second mineral which occurs in the same environment, chalcedony, restricts the release of toxins from cinnabar ore.

Mining chemists suggest spreading chalcedony in the Redstone Mine in order to preserve the surviving workers.

We need to say that the suggestion will be successful - so spreading chalcedony will preserve the surviving workers.

A It accumulates in deposits which are concentrated in the mineral veins where cinnabar is found.

This tells us that if we spread chalcedony, it will accumulate in places where cinnabar is found. Well, then it makes it likely that it will be able to stop the toxins from releasing from cinnabar.

Another interpretation could be that it is already found concentrated in places where cinnabar is found. Then how will spreading help and hence the confusion. But since no other option helps, we should take the previous interpretation.

B It can on some occasions stay inactive in mineral veins for almost five years before it begins to spread.

Irrelevant. We are planning on spreading it ourselves. What it does normally we don't care.

C It spreads through an environment more gradually than does cinnabar in most geological settings.

The point is, if we spread it, will it preserve the health of workers? What it normally does is irrelevant.

D It does not prevent a few common varieties of cinnabar ore from releasing toxins.

This weakens our suggestion.

E It can occasionally damage fish populations by poisoning their gills.

Irrelevant.

Answer (A)
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,310
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,310
Kudos: 927
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel: Source: GMAC Paper Testsx
i think this source should be removed.

This question wasted lot of time and as expert mentioned, this doesn't seem to be an official question.

please check

thanks!
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 951
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 951
Kudos: 202
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aaba
Toxic bioaccumulation, a mining hazard induced by the mercury compounds transferred from unrefined cinnabar ore, presently afflicts 7 of every 10 workers in the Redstone Mine. A second mineral which occurs in the same environment, chalcedony, restricts the release of toxins from cinnabar ore. Mining chemists suggest spreading chalcedony in the Redstone Mine in order to preserve the surviving workers.

Which of the following, if true about chalcedony, provides the strongest evidence that the suggestion will be successful? .

A It accumulates in deposits which are concentrated in the mineral veins where cinnabar is found.
If it accumlates then it will result in higher concentration which will result in spreading the other harmful chemicals

B It can on some occasions stay inactive in mineral veins for almost five years before it begins to spread.
THis will certainly weaken since if it doesn't activate instantaneosly then the harmful chemicals will spread unchecked

C It spreads through an environment more gradually than does cinnabar in most geological settings.
more gradually is akward meaning if i infer right i guess it talks about slow spreading with inevitabily will harm the process of eradication of harmful agents

D It does not prevent a few common varieties of cinnabar ore from releasing toxins.
This will certainly weaken the cause since if common variables are not eleminated the dangerous chemicals will presist

E It can occasionally damage fish populations by poisoning their gills.
Even though it's out of context it will certainly weaken since it should be a sustainable alternative rather than affecting the environment

Therefore IMO A
User avatar
Raman109
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 811
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Products:
Posts: 811
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option elimination -

A It accumulates in deposits which are concentrated in the mineral veins where cinnabar is found. - ok.

B It can on some occasions stay inactive in mineral veins for almost five years before it begins to spread. - This talks about the general activity or inactivity of chalcedony. What we are concerned about is when we spread chalcedony - does it help reduce the release of toxins? This option is out of scope.

C It spreads through an environment more gradually than does cinnabar in most geological settings. - comparison of chalcedony spread with the canibar spread is irrelevant. Out of scope.

D It does not prevent a few common varieties of cinnabar ore from releasing toxins. - weakener

E It can occasionally damage fish populations by poisoning their gills. - out of scope.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,442
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,442
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts