Last visit was: 11 Jul 2025, 17:05 It is currently 11 Jul 2025, 17:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shantanu4678
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Last visit: 14 Nov 2004
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
39
 [39]
Posts: 8
Kudos: 39
 [39]
Kudos
Add Kudos
39
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
ChrisLele
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
4,738
 [11]
Given Kudos: 2
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 295
Kudos: 4,738
 [11]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
paneer
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Last visit: 14 Sep 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
133
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 22
Kudos: 133
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Dharmin
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Last visit: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Own Kudos:
32
 [2]
Location: India
Posts: 209
Kudos: 32
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
clearly "C".


Some fine points:

1. "armed only with X and Y" is correct compare with "only armed with X and Y" bcoz "only" needs to modify - X and Y.

2. "began" and "armed" - Simple past go in parallel with each other.

3. "having travelled" - Pefect participle in choice "D" is worng here.

4. "traveling the back roads of Hungary" needs to modify the subject - "Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly"

please post OA and Explanation.
User avatar
aknine
Joined: 07 Jun 2009
Last visit: 30 Aug 2014
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 73
Kudos: 99
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree with option C
(C) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only

___________ with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.

A comma is placed to bring a pause in the speech. Words written within 2 commas in a sentence provide additional details, and even if not read, the sentence still retains its meaning.
When stressing on a date of an year, it should be separated from the main sentence by a comma.

(A) Traveling the back roads of Hungary,in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only.
(B) In 1905, Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, traveling the back roads of Hungary, began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were only armed,
(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology;(incorrect placing of semi colon) they were only armed
(E) Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, arming themselves only
User avatar
trainspotting
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Last visit: 26 Feb 2010
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 82
Kudos: 337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Its has to be between A, C and E..But A and E have modifier errors...E is very passive as well...C is the best choice...
User avatar
mayank11881
Joined: 29 May 2010
Last visit: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paneer
Neochronic
c) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only

In the above option,

1) shouldnt there be a coma after 1905 ?
2) travelling back roads of hungary and armed only with XX... are 2 diff prashes.. shouldnt they be connected properly.

1. yep! after 1905, there should be a comma
2. Guess what? Option C is wrong too! But it is the best in the lot.

In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only says Hungarian roads were armed!! :shock:

Option C should have read In 1905, Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, armed only

These questions are not from 'reliable' sources so you just have to settle with the fact that you have to choose the 'best answer' :roll:

The fun in answering such questions is that you kinda get digging deeper into elements of the sentence to find out the error; makes a huge difference in your learning! :)



For anwer C to be correct, there has to be a comma before armed. Without comma armed seems to modify Hungary. There has to be some misprint else option B is the best answer.
User avatar
rphardu
Joined: 23 May 2011
Last visit: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Status:Appearing for GMAT
Location: United States (NJ)
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 70
Kudos: 870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shantanu4678
Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.

(A) Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only

(B) In 1905, Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, traveling the back roads of Hungary, began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were only armed

(C) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only

(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology; they were only armed

(E) Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, arming themselves only


I selected B because of two reasons.
1. We need to put Noun modifier as close as possible so in (B) "traveling the back roads of Hungary" is closest to Noun "Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly".
2. I think we can not start sentence with "In +year" without following Comma. "Experts please comment"

Example from one report (https://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report.aspx)
In 2004, the APA Task Force on Advertising and Children produced a report examining broad issues related to advertising to children.

In C, Can someone please explain if "traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only............... insatiable curiosity" is acting as a single modifier to sentence then why is it not modifying ethnomusicology.

Guys, I can not see any clear cut explanation for this problem. Please help.
User avatar
vibhav
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Last visit: 13 Oct 2014
Posts: 213
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Posts: 213
Kudos: 797
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO B. C should have the comma before armed. Thats why B makes sense. additionally travelling correctly modifies the people involved.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,345
 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,345
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In B, the placement of the adverb only creates a problem. It means that only Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly were armed with xxxxx, while nobody else was or were armed. This is altered intent.
User avatar
maaadhu
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Last visit: 16 Sep 2014
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 96
Kudos: 186
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If C is correct then a comma needs to be present after "back roads of Hungary ". If not Option C reads as if the "roads are armed" and not "bela and Zoltan". Please correct if I am wrong.
User avatar
aditi1903
Joined: 29 Apr 2012
Last visit: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 10-22-2012
Posts: 53
Kudos: 205
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
smashingpumpkins
Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.
(A) Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only
(B) In 1905, Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, traveling the back roads of Hungary, began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were only armed
(C) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only
(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology; they were only armed
(E) Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, arming themselves only

I think it is C..



why do you think that in option C.... traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only is correctly modifying bela and zoltan?
im not sure.
can someone pls explain.??
User avatar
janxavier
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2014
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Location: United States
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Insurance)
Posts: 23
Kudos: 111
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
smashingpumpkins
Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Béla Bartók and Zoltán Kodály began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.
(A) Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only
(B) In 1905, Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, traveling the back roads of Hungary, began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were only armed
(C) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only
(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology; they were only armed
(E) Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, arming themselves only

I think it is C..


A - travelling . . . , in 1905 - wrong
B & D - only armed

For me it is between C and E.
E - arming themselves only seems odd

So I pick C
User avatar
arirux92
Joined: 03 May 2015
Last visit: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
240
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE:Web Development (Insurance)
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Only armed with vs armed only with...


Only armed with implies that they were only armed with ... blah blah .... There was NOTHING ELSE THAT WAS HAPPENING !!!! They weren't eating, they weren't breathing (0_o)

Whereas armed only with implies that they had nothing other than the phonograph.

The placement of only is of great importance here. For this reason it can't be B
User avatar
emcheeks
Joined: 28 Jun 2020
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
108
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Posts: 119
Kudos: 108
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Many people argued that there should be a comma before "armed" in C. However, there should be a "and" not a comma.

If comma: In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.

then we would have a similar mistake as in E. There should be "and" in front of "armed" to show the parallelism between "traveling" (present participle) and "armed" (past participle) (yes, they are parallel).


However, "and" is not necessary!!

For example: Alfred the Great acted as his own spy, visiting Danish camps disguised as a minstrel.

Here, we don't have anything connecting "visiting" and "disguised" but this sentence is still correct.


The takeaway from this is that, sometimes, we can ignore "and" as the above examples.
User avatar
abhik1502
Joined: 09 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Mar 2022
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.6
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 129
Kudos: 47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I really doubt about C being the correct answer.

emcheeks said it right that there should be and before "armed". But this also will not follow modifier rule and modify anything.

MOreover armed is suppose to modify "Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly " and not the road. So keeping this into consideration I don't see any issue with A.
I agree position of "in 1905" is not preferable in A but that out of all options A is best choice.
User avatar
sssanskaar
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 09 Oct 2022
Posts: 221
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
Posts: 221
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Experts, please confirm whether an 'and' should be present before 'armed' so that 'armed' shouldn't seem to modify 'Hungary'.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,372
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,372
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sssanskaar
Experts, please confirm whether an 'and' should be present before 'armed' so that 'armed' shouldn't seem to modify 'Hungary'.
Hello, sssanskaar. There is no need for and to appear before armed: the context of the sentence allows us to appreciate that Hungary cannot be armed with a phonograph and curiosity. Similarly, if I were to write the sentence,

The robbers fled the bank armed with semiautomatic pistols

there is no confusion over whether the robbers or the bank may be the armed party—a bank cannot be armed with pistols, even if guards within that bank can be. I could not, however, write a somewhat similar sentence in which I intended to convey that the robbers made off while being protected, since the meaning would then be unclear:

The robbers fled the bank protected under armed guard.

Now, it is unclear whether the robbers or the bank should be paired with the modifier, since either one could be protected under armed guard. The sentence should be rewritten to convey a clearer message.

I tell people all the time to practice applying a meaning-based approach to SC. Grammar can take you quite far, but to reach the next level of mastery, you often have to rely on knowledge that may bend the so-called rules.

I hope that helps with your query. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
SDW2
Joined: 17 Jun 2020
Last visit: 05 Mar 2024
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 314
Location: India
Schools: Simon '25
Schools: Simon '25
Posts: 102
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shantanu4678
Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.


(A) Traveling the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were armed only

(B) In 1905, Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, traveling the back roads of Hungary, began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, and they were only armed

(C) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only

(D) Having traveled the back roads of Hungary, in 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology; they were only armed

(E) Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly, in 1905 began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary, arming themselves only

Hello,
In C, doesn't "armed" seem to modify Hungary? VeritasKarishma, egmat, GMATNinja
avatar
Flowerybunny
Joined: 30 Aug 2021
Last visit: 21 Mar 2022
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 39
Location: United States
Schools: Booth '20
GRE 1: Q159 V156
Schools: Booth '20
GRE 1: Q159 V156
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would really appreciate it if someone can explain why is that in Option C, the modifier “travelling the roads…” is able to modify “Bela and Zoltan”, instead of “ethnomusicology” or “their pioneering work”?

(C) In 1905 Bela Bartok and Zoltan Kodaly began their pioneering work in ethnomusicology, traveling the back roads of Hungary armed only with an Edison phonograph and insatiable curiosity.


Here is another question, which I think is about modifiers:

The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.

(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting

(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting

(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment


In the question pasted above, I chose Option (C) (which is the official answer) as I felt that the preposition/modifiers in remaining answer choices modify “quota” instead of "offer".

Could someone share their insights on how these two questions are different, where first question allows “travelling the roads…” to modify “Bela and Zoltan”, while in the second question, for example answer choice B, “having no commitment” would be unable to modify “offer” in “the law firm’s offer”?



Update: For anyone with the same question. The explanation should be as follows:

Quote from TomATManhattanGMAT on "The Achaemenid empire of Persia reached the Indus Valley in the fifth" question:

These “comma –ing” structures are adverbial modifiers, which modify the preceding clause (subject and verb)

In the initial question, "Bela and Zoltan" are the subject of the sentence, while in the second question, "The attorney" is the subject of the sentence. As such “having no commitment” would modify the "The attorney" which is illogical.

Thank you! :) TomATManhattanGMAT
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts