It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 04:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 688
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2008, 05:44
2
This post received
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:02) correct 45% (01:27) wrong based on 1378 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.
Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

(A) Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.
(B) After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.
The country won't be able to meet the increased demand for goods if its factories are already operating at a peak. Hence no increase in revenue from exports.
(C) The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.
(D) Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir's on the world market all currently have stable currencies.
(E) A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 441
Location: Earth
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2008, 10:06
Debated between C and E.

Vote for C.
Eliminate E as there is no mention of Economy as such in the argument.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2950
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2008, 16:05
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I go for E.

prasannar wrote:
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again(main argument).
Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

(A) Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness. <-- Strengthens argument
(B) After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.
The country won't be able to meet the increased demand for goods if its factories are already operating at a peak. Hence no increase in revenue from exports. <-- very tempting but again irrelevant to the argument which only talks of increasing exports and not about revenue from exports
(C) The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant. <-- irrelevant to the main argument - which only talks of increasing exports and not about the economy
(D) Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir's on the world market all currently have stable currencies. <-- So what ? Too far fetched making this irrelevant
(E) A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies. <-- Only good option I feel
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 18
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2008, 23:35
i go with C....

Whats the ANSWER
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 449
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 12:00
I guess its E since " rise in exports " is being questioned
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 459
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 18:58
d.
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

3 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1439
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 19:37
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
prasannar wrote:
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when the Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.
Which of the following, if true, provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt that the politicians' recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?

(A) Several of the politicians now recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.
(B) After several decades of operating well below peak capacity, Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.
The country won't be able to meet the increased demand for goods if its factories are already operating at a peak. Hence no increase in revenue from exports.
(C) The economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.
(D) Those countries whose manufactured products compete with Darfir's on the world market all currently have stable currencies.
(E) A sharp improvement in the efficiency of Darfir's manufacturing plants would make Darfir's products a bargain on world markets even without any weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.


I got B, and after reading some posts, I notice that it talks about revenue. However, I still think it is the best choice. Since there is no more manufacturing capacity, weakening the currency won't help; thus, government can doubt the plan.

Argument here is that weakening currency ->increased export, and we have to prove that this plan will NOT work.

A. This strengthens the argument, if at all.
C. Strong currency OR significant rise in export -> healthy economy. This argument do not relate anything to the main argument. I feel that this is irrelevant as it doesn't prove that the plan won't work.
D. Irrelevant. Not talking about strength of currency here.
E. This is also irrelevant. We are not talking about efficiency of plants. This only gives an alternative to weaken currency method and it does not prove that the politicians won't achieve their aim.

Last edited by bkk145 on 08 Apr 2008, 19:39, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 494
Location: Kolkata
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 19:38
it is certainly between c and e..all other are ruled out.both are close and would go with e as it is stating that there are other factors like technology to have world market gain and not simply by weakening the currency.
1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1439
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 19:42
1
This post received
KUDOS
I don't know why I am the only one who picked B.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2950
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 19:48
Well I did find B very tempting but decided on E in the end - see my reasoning above ...

bkk145 wrote:
I don't know why I am the only one who picked B.
1 KUDOS received
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3357
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 19:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
I believe the OA for this one is B
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 98
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 19:52
I agree with bkk145. B
_________________

MBA Blog: University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management- http://unconventionalapplicant.blogspot.com/

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 459
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2008, 09:38
prasanna,
Is OA B?
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2008, 04:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
The right answer is B.

If your country is already operating at near peak production capacity, whats the point of trying to raise exports if you cant produce anymore?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2008, 07:22
I dont know why I'm going differently from a lot of you here, I go for D after choosing between D and E. Simply the politician recommends weak pundra so as to increase export, which can only result from bargain products in the market. Only D shows how this recommendation will not work.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 790
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2008, 07:53
I am going with B.

D & E answer if true, will cause the plan to fail as well, but it desn't contradict the politicians point. I think...
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 688
Re: Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2008, 09:22
OA is B
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2012, 23:27
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on the world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Which of the following if true provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt the politican's recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?
a) Several of the politicians no recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.
b) After several decades of operating well below its peak capcity, darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels
c) the economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.
d) those countries whose manufactured products compete with darfir's on the world market currently all have stable currencies
e) a sharp improvement in the efficiency of darfir's manufacturing plants would make darfir's products a bargain on the world markets even without weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.

Can someone explain???
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7440
Location: Pune, India
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2012, 03:31
madGMAT wrote:
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were extended periods when Darfir Republic's currency, the pundra, was weak: its value was unusually low relative to the world's most stable currencies. Both times a weak pundra made Darfir's manufactured products a bargain on the world markets, and Darfir's exports were up substantially. Now some politicians are saying that, in order to cause another similarly sized increase in exports, the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Which of the following if true provides the government with the strongest grounds to doubt the politican's recommendation, if followed, will achieve its aim?
a) Several of the politicians no recommending that the pundra be allowed to become weak made that same recommendation before each of the last two periods of currency weakness.
b) After several decades of operating well below its peak capcity, darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels
c) the economy of a country experiencing a rise in exports will become healthier only if the country's currency is strong or the rise in exports is significant.
d) those countries whose manufactured products compete with darfir's on the world market currently all have stable currencies
e) a sharp improvement in the efficiency of darfir's manufacturing plants would make darfir's products a bargain on the world markets even without weakening of the pundra relative to other currencies.

Can someone explain???


It is a 'weaken the plan' question.

What is the plan?
Plan: When currency weakens, exports increase. (Foreigners can buy more using same amount of their currencies so they buy more.) Therefore, in order to cause [highlight]another similarly sized increase in exports[/highlight], the government should allow the pundra to become weak again.

Focus on the highlighted words. The aim is to cause a similarly sized increase in exports. That is what the plan is trying to achieve. On weaken questions, we focus on the conclusion. What the plan is trying to achieve is parallel to conclusion. So we focus on trying to weaken what the plan is trying to achieve. We need to find something that tells us why we will not get a similarly sized increase in exports even if we weaken pundra.

Options a, c, d and e do not talk about the reasons we will not see similarly sized increase in exports.
Option B tells us that darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels. If this is true, exports cannot increase much because darfir cannot manufacture more than it is manufacturing now. If there are no extra products manufactured, there cannot be extra exports. In previous instances, darfir was manufacturing below capacity so they could manufacture extra products. Hence the plan worked in those instances but this time it may not. Therefore, option (B) is correct.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 192
GPA: 3.5
Re: CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2012, 06:18
Here we have to weaken the politican's recommendation,which proposes that the government should allow the pundra to become weak and that would increase the export,agreed as it happen earlier.

But B suggests that darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels so why would a government want to weaken it's currency hence B weakens the politican's recommendation.
Re: CR   [#permalink] 20 Jan 2012, 06:18

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 44 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
CR - Twelve years ago and again five years ago... leia23 0 15 Jun 2017, 08:45
10 Five years ago, the town of Bayside, in the Katontic River guerrero25 11 24 Jun 2017, 22:11
Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were madGMAT 0 20 Jan 2012, 06:18
33 Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of mymba99 37 30 Jul 2016, 11:29
3 Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were rishabhmudgal 8 01 Jul 2016, 19:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Twelve years ago and again five years ago, there were

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.