WhoIsTheAuthor
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo
2. The passage suggests that the author of the passage believes which of the following?
Please guide me if I'm wrong..
Between C & E-
Last line of last para says-"If the individualist framework, with its claim for women's autonomy, could be harmonized with the family-oriented concerns of relational feminists, a more fruitful model for contemporary feminist politics
could emerge"
Option C says-" A consensus concerning the direction of future feminist politics
will probably soon emerge, given the awareness among feminists of the need for cooperation among women."
What I inferred is that the author is optimistic regarding new feministic policy(which is blend of both).
Option E says-"
Relational feminism provides the
best theoretical
framework for contemporary feminist politics, but
individualist feminism could contribute
much toward
refining and strengthening modern feminist thought."
Which I think is distortion of last line, as the author says the
new feminist thought which he hopes may soon emerge
is fruitful for contemp. pol., whereas the option says
rel. fem. provides framework for contemp. pol. &
Ind. fem. is refining & bla..bla.. is not mentioned in the passage.
You've correctly identified the piece of (C) that helps us eliminate that answer choice. Does saying in the passage that something
could occur mean that the author believes it
probably will occur?
Consider this example: I
could stop eating doughnuts, which would be good for my health. Stating this fact, and even being optimistic about the potential health benefits of giving them up, doesn't mean I
probably will stop eating doughnuts -- maybe I really love doughnuts. Maybe it's a family tradition to eat doughnuts every Sunday, and that is more important to me than the health benefits of giving them up. (Mmm... doughnuts.

)
Similarly, the author saying that the two forms of feminism
could merge with one another to create a new model doesn't mean that the author believes this
probably will happen. The author is optimistic that IF this did come to pass, the result could be a "more fruitful model for contemporary feminist politics." That is different than being optimistic that the event actually will come to pass.
(C) is out for question #2.
For (E), the details in the answer choice do not align well with the information in the passage. In that last sentence, the author argues that the "individualist framework" could be harmonized with "the family-oriented concerns of relational feminists" to produce a more fruitful feminist model.
(E), on the other hand, states that "
relational feminism provides the best theoretical framework for contemporary feminist politics."
This statement is not supported by the passage, so we cannot say that the author would agree with it. (E) is out.
Take another look at (D):
Quote:
(D) Political adversaries of feminism often misuse arguments predicated on differences between the sexes to argue that the existing social system should be maintained.
This is essentially a restatement of the first sentence of the last paragraph in the passage:
Quote:
Relational arguments have a major pitfall: because they underline women’s physiological and psychological distinctiveness, they are often appropriated by political adversaries and used to endorse male privilege.
(D) is the correct answer for question #2.
I hope that helps!