(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests

The comparison should be between the raider ants and leafcutters and most other ants. Only C and D survive. ‘In having nests’ in D is doesn’t make a parallel comparison with raider ants make a portable nest; C correctly points to the nests by using the possessive pronoun ‘whose’

_________________

Template of like, unlike, in contrast with, in contrast to etc is

"Unlike Noun1, Noun2."


Here Noun1 is leaf cutters and most other ants
Noun2 is Raider Ants.
_________________

Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests

As soon as I read the sentence, there is a comparison of X and Y as we have a marker of "Unlike". And we need to compare correct nouns to correct nouns.
So, for the non - underlined part, the type of ants are compared, so we need type of ants at the beginning.

Hence A,B and E goes off.

Next, Unlike X, Y does Z -> is the correct structure. So, we need an action describing what Y does that X doesn't do.
If we need to add extra information, we need a modifier. Option C) does exactly that.

For option D) in having -> looks like an action for X which is not correct. And besides, that, having is used for possessive form.

hence C)

unlike (X),---, raider ants (Y)

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests
_________________

Hi experts,
I just feel "in having nest" in D is strange, but I have no idea about what's wrong with "in having nest",
I went back to OE

it confused me a lot
any expert can help?

thank a lot
have a nice day

>_~

experts,
HELP PLEASE...

thanks a lot
have a nice day
>_~

Consider the following sentence:
In having nests, raider ants make a portable....

In the above structure, "in having nests" refers to the raider ants. This is what the OE indicates.

thanks so much sayantan2c,

sorry for my implicit previous post

why does not modify "leaf cutters and most other ants",according touch rules,
the prep phrase "in having nest" follows immediately "leaf cutters and most other ants"

that's why I am confused after reading OE,
did I miss something ? please point out
appreciate...

have a nice day
>_~

In option D, the prepositional phrase can be considered a part of the following clause:
In having nests, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs.

Out of option D, you cannot make such a structure using leaf cutters and most other ants. Hence the OE.

thanks so much sayantanc2k,
you are always so patient ...

I am afraid I am sunk in the difference that prep phrase follows after noun.

1/ leaf cutters and most other ants in the corner
2/ leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests

for me, " in having nests " is a prep phrase , "in the corner" is also a prep phrase...
moreover, both follow immediately after a noun, and modify the preceding noun/noun phrase...

waiting for your reply

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~

"In the corner" is a place - a boy in the corner refers to the boy who is in the corner.
In the contrary, "in having bests" is not a place - it means "in the process of having nests" - in such case a verb is required and the subject of the verb is the noun that this phrase refers to.

I found the answer but I wasn't very comfortable with using "whose" for ants. As I know, we cannot use "who" for the things other than people. Can we use whose for animals or non-living things?

Yes, we can.

'Who' is a nominative pronoun(a subject pronoun) that is usable only for humans. 'Which' is also a nominative pronoun that is usable for other animals, and even all other inanimate things such as books, tables etc -- all in all to say, for everything under the universe

'Whose' is a possessive form of both 'who' and 'which' and hence is universally usable in common.
_________________

sayantanc2k, great thanks to you, as I do find many of your posts in the forum were really helpful.

After reading this, I think I kind of understand it, but not fully. As a non-native speaker, I hope if I can have some further explanation in D:

1. I can feel "in having" is awkward, I didn't pick up this option. But I don't really understand the explanation in OG for D, why does OG said "in having" refers to raider ants, not the preceding nouns before "in having".

Unlike L and most other ants in having nests situated on the ground, raider ants make portable nests....

Comma sets off these two parts in this sentence, why "in having" as a prepositional phrase modify the noun behind the itself and the comma?

Do you mean this sentence conveys the meaning like this:

The difference between L and most other ants and raider ants in the aspect of having nests situated on the ground is that raider ants make nests.....

2. Does "in having nests situated", have the similar use of have+sth.+done? E.g."having the house painted"

3. Is the following amending valid?
Unlike L and most of other ants (having nests situated on the ground), raider ants make....

I know the use of unlike: "unlike+noun or noun phrase". In the above sentence, can "having nests situated on the ground" modifying (leaf cutters and most of other ants)?

I really wanted to give up in these questions that may not be so relevant to the original purpose of examining from OG, but these questions bothers me several days, I had to finally post them here....hopefully someone will help me on this. Thanks a lot!

Hello daagh

I have seen the usage "having" in some OG sentences but not all correct questions have this form (verb-ing modifier or prepositional phrase) like in the above sentence. Is there a reason for that or it all depends on meaning?


Thanks

Hello Shiv2016, IMO it all depends on the meaning of the answer choice and nothing as such that -ing words are not contained in official answers.
_________________

Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants - illogically compares the nests with raider ants
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are - illogically compares the nests with raider ants
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are - Correct
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests - The prepositional phrase “in having nests” seems to modify the subject “raider ants” and thus imply that raider ants have their nests underground. From the remaining part of the sentence, it is clear that this is not the case.
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests - illogical comparison , It is not clear what “those” refers to

Answer C
_________________

Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, -> Comparison is between leaf cutters and most other ants and raider ants, not between The nest and raider ants.
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are -->Wrong comparison, and which describe other ants
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are -> Corrected comparison error.
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests -> having nest meaning not clear
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests ->Those again compare nest with raider ants.

So option D is correct

Hello Everyone!

This is a great example of a comparison question! Let's take a closer look at it to determine how to best tackle this type of question. Before we dive in, let's take a quick look at the original question and highlight any major differences between each option in orange:

Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants,
(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are
(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are
(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests
(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests

After a quick glance over the options, a couple major differences jump out:

1. What they're comparing: the nests of ants / the ants themselves / those of the ants
2. Where the "nests" are located in each option

Since we know this sentence is comparing two items, we MUST first check that the two items being compared are parallel! After reading over the rest of the sentence, we can see that we're comparing "raider ants" to something that's underlined. Let's see which options use parallel structure, and which options fall short:

(A) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, --> WRONG
(It's comparing nests to raider ants, which aren't parallel in type.)

(B) the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are --> WRONG
(It's also comparing nests to ants, which aren't parallel in type.)

(C) leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are --> OK
(It's comparing ants to ants, which is parallel!)

(D) leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests --> OK
(It's comparing ants to ants, which is parallel!)

(E) those of leaf cutters and most other ants with nests --> WRONG
(This is comparing ants to "those of" ants, which is not parallel. It is also unclear what "those of" is even referring to.)

We can eliminate options A, B, and E because they haven't created a parallel comparison based on the types of ants.

Let's take a closer look at options C and D to determine which is the best choice. To do this, I've added the options to the rest of the sentence:

(C) Unlike leaf cutters and most other ants, whose nests are situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

This is CORRECT because it uses the correct comma placement to indicate that the phrase highlighted in green is a non-essential phrase! It's not necessary to know where leaf cutters and other ants make their nests. It's only important to know that they DON'T do what raider ants do, and this sentence makes that clear with or without that extra information.

(D) Unlike leaf cutters and most other ants in having nests situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form "curtains" of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

This options is INCORRECT because it doesn't use the correct comma placement to show that the phrase "in having nests situated underground or in pieces of wood" is a non-essential phrase. It's missing a comma before "in" for this to work. It's also incorrect because "in having" sounds awkward and isn't necessary - just say "having" to convey the same meaning.


There you go - option C is the correct choice!


Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________