Last visit was: 18 Jan 2025, 03:09 It is currently 18 Jan 2025, 03:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 39,612
Own Kudos:
77,364
 [11]
Given Kudos: 21,801
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,612
Kudos: 77,364
 [11]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DisciplinedPrep
Joined: 15 Jan 2018
Last visit: 08 Jul 2023
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
2,146
 [1]
Given Kudos: 628
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 2,146
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 39,612
Own Kudos:
77,364
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21,801
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,612
Kudos: 77,364
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Narenn
User avatar
MBA Section Director
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 8,904
Own Kudos:
10,542
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4,596
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Test: Test
Expert reply
Posts: 8,904
Kudos: 10,542
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here are top gainers & losers in 2021 rankings as well as a graph displaying consistent progression shown by Foster, USC, and Jones in US News rankings since 2008


Top Gainers/Losers


Attachment:
TopGainers&Losers.png
TopGainers&Losers.png [ 38.41 KiB | Viewed 15767 times ]

Progression of USC Marshall, Foster, & Jones in US News Rankings


Attachment:
RankingProgression.png
RankingProgression.png [ 53.81 KiB | Viewed 14206 times ]
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 39,612
Own Kudos:
77,364
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21,801
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,612
Kudos: 77,364
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Interesting! Carlson! That program stands out because it has a fairly low proportion of the international students. Only 19% off the roughly 90 enrolled students in the full-time program. I guess the impact of the immigration policies may have helped besides whatever else they’re doing right....

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
easterngod
Joined: 18 Oct 2019
Last visit: 28 May 2021
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 3.46
WE:Analyst (Real Estate)
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
Posts: 45
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Minus HBS I think the rankings are accurate (would be more fair to insert as a tie for 1st or 3rd). Was surprised to see Wharton hold onto #1, but I think it is deserved.
User avatar
MBAPrepCoach
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 3,839
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 614
Status:MBA Admissions Consultant
Affiliations: MBA Prep Coach
Location: United States
Farrell Nelson: MBA
Expert reply
Posts: 3,839
Kudos: 1,489
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agree with your assessment
easterngod
Minus HBS I think the rankings are accurate (would be more fair to insert as a tie for 1st or 3rd). Was surprised to see Wharton hold onto #1, but I think it is deserved.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
JohnJohnJ
Joined: 28 Apr 2019
Last visit: 08 Sep 2024
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
77
 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 256
Kudos: 77
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is well deserved for Carlson and Kellogg. Unfortunate but true, I thought MIT was always overrated

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
sdlife
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 185
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Any thoughts on why Tuck hasn't been able to break into Top 10?
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 39,612
Own Kudos:
77,364
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21,801
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,612
Kudos: 77,364
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good question about Tuck - I don't know. It has been a TOP 10 program for a long time - here is a snapshot for the last 13 years (2008 - 2020; note that 2020 was last year per US News).

I feel Tuck is ahead of Stern in terms of recruiting and placements (the part that matters per se) but more things go into the US News rankings...
Attachments

Tuck-rank.png
Tuck-rank.png [ 179.04 KiB | Viewed 12086 times ]

User avatar
FinanceMan
User avatar
Masters of Science Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Feb 2020
Last visit: 07 Nov 2024
Posts: 249
Own Kudos:
149
 [1]
Given Kudos: 113
Location: United States (OK)
Posts: 249
Kudos: 149
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not like many at GMAT Club care because most are aiming at top 25 schools but being from Oklahoma, it was interesting to see the University of Oklahoma (Price) go from #58 in 2020 rankings to #85 on 2021 rankings! A drop of dang near 30 spots!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 39,612
Own Kudos:
77,364
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21,801
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 39,612
Kudos: 77,364
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for pointing it out. I haven’t had a chance to go below the top 30 yet but that’s a huge move. Painful too. I wish US news provided the background of what caused the change.... Maybe I have not found it yet.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
FinanceMan
User avatar
Masters of Science Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Feb 2020
Last visit: 07 Nov 2024
Posts: 249
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 113
Location: United States (OK)
Posts: 249
Kudos: 149
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Definitely a painful move. I know that Price is heavily investing in their EMBA in Energy currently but I would not think that would have much bearing on their US News Ranking. I am not sure what would have caused their rankings to drop so much unless US News factors in the negative publicity the University has been receiving lately.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
JohnJohnJ
Joined: 28 Apr 2019
Last visit: 08 Sep 2024
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 256
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The reason why Tuck does not come in the top 10 is because of following reasons
1. Tuck loses out on points because of the lack of networking opportunities (it is a small class size)
2. Tuck does not have a PhD program
3. Tuck is a consulting school (I compare it to Insead) - I think it’s among the best schools for consulting (in some cases H/S/W)
4. Tuck has not been able to leverage its Ivy brand like Yale

Also, I usually get into debates with BB about a few opinions, I don’t entirely agree with BB that Tuck’s employment is better than Stern. Tuck is definitely the best for consulting.
But I do feel that Tuck should be in the top 10 and a few in the current top 10 should be thrown out.
Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
sdlife
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 185
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnJohnJ
The reason why Tuck does not come in the top 10 is because of following reasons
1. Tuck loses out on points because of the lack of networking opportunities (it is a small class size)
2. Tuck does not have a PhD program
3. Tuck is a consulting school (I compare it to Insead) - I think it’s among the best schools for consulting (in some cases H/S/W)
4. Tuck has not been able to leverage its Ivy brand like Yale

Also, I usually get into debates with BB about a few opinions, I don’t entirely agree with BB that Tuck’s employment is better than Stern. Tuck is definitely the best for consulting.
But I do feel that Tuck should be in the top 10 and a few in the current top 10 should be thrown out.
Posted from my mobile device


bb and JohnJohnJ - thank you both! I guess I am trying to understand what changed in the last two years.

John - those factors that you mentioned were always true for Tuck, but as bb mentioned it was still consistently ranked in the top 10. What is the one (or mutip\ple) metric that changed? I don't fully know the US news methodology, but except the drop in apps (and consequently high acceptance rate), I don't see anything else that has changed for Tuck in the recent years!

BTW, I am a Tuck admit, so keen on understanding this. Thank you again!
User avatar
BlueBook
Joined: 17 Oct 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: Kenya
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 510 Q26 V34
WE:Science (Energy)
GMAT 1: 510 Q26 V34
Posts: 55
Kudos: 37
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why the drop for Harvard and MIT and the rise of Kellogg and Booth?? Also, I'm impressed with Stern climbing into 10th!! Great job for them. All in all, too many ties for me. Remember to also take the rankings with a pinch of salt because marketing and lobbying goes into it as well
avatar
JohnJohnJ
Joined: 28 Apr 2019
Last visit: 08 Sep 2024
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
77
 [2]
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 256
Kudos: 77
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In my opinion the metric did not change for Tuck but it changed for other schools. While I may not be an expert, but I feel that the following factors may have impacted the ranking
1. Other schools did significantly better than their previous years with their employment reports.
2. Kellogg, Wharton, and Yale have new deans, these schools have shown gender and racial diversity in selecting their dean - in the business world, diversity is highly regarded (Columbia also has a new dean).
3. The other schools may have had a higher # of research papers published
Feel free to DM if you have specific questions

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
JohnJohnJ
Joined: 28 Apr 2019
Last visit: 08 Sep 2024
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 256
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BlueBook
Why the drop for Harvard and MIT and the rise of Kellogg and Booth?? Also, I'm....
Something to do with the Boston area schools, economic indicators? Tuck had a great year for consulting (in Boston Area). These rankings ignore the entrepreneurs from Harvard while collecting their survey, employment and teaching quality. Stanford and Harvard are known for creating entrepreneurs, so the #6 for Harvard is not justified

In Chicago, Kellogg and Booth are great schools, traditionally Kellogg has created many more business leaders than Booth, and Booth has had several consulting firm and PE founders (more than Harvard)

In New York, in my opinion - Columbia and Stern have usually been the same, where Columbia gets a lot more sponsored students (the MBB sponsored) for the Ivy label and Stern gets the remaining.

In SF, I just know that salaries are way higher than the average salary anywhere else in the country
Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
sdlife
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Last visit: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 185
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 185
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JohnJohnJ
In my opinion the metric did not change for Tuck but it changed for other schools. While I may not be an expert, but I feel that the following factors may have impacted the ranking
1. Other schools did significantly better than their previous years with their employment reports.
2. Kellogg, Wharton, and Yale have new deans, these schools have shown gender and racial diversity in selecting their dean - in the business world, diversity is highly regarded (Columbia also has a new dean).
3. The other schools may have had a higher # of research papers published
Feel free to DM if you have specific questions

Posted from my mobile device

Ok thanks for sharing your thoughts.
User avatar
souvik101990
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 4,325
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,325
Kudos: 52,287
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FWIW - here is the US News methodology - https://www.usnews.com/education/best-g ... ethodology

Big swings would most likely relate to virality! Wharton lost their dean to Marshall but kept their position and Marshall went up. It seems peer review is a pretty big indicator of the rankings!

Research papers are not a part of the USN methodology afaik. This was a pretty clickbaity attempt :) I have a feeling a certain business school news and speculation website (think buzzfeed for MBA) had some input for USN auditors :)
 1   2   
Moderator:
BSchool Forum Moderator
1 posts