1. Which of the following best describes the structure of the passage?
A. It mentions a puzzling situation, and then describes three approaches people have taken to help understand that situation.
No puzzling situation is mentioned. Passage talks about a past eventB. It presents an argument for why something took place, and then offers a refutation of that argument.
NO refutation of argument happensC. It introduces a past phenomenon and then presents three explanations for why the phenomenon took place.
correct, passage starts with explaining a past event and then presents explanation by 3 persons on why the event took place.D. It describes a problem, offers a solution to the problem, and then offers reasons why the solution could not work.
No solution is offeredE. It offers three explanations for a phenomenon and then summarizes what all three have in common.
All 3 explanations have nothing in common2. Which of the following statements presents the strongest conclusion one could draw based on the information given in the passage?
A. The collapse of the Internet stock “bubble” drove thousands of investors into bankruptcy.
No, not explicitly mentioned in the passageB. People involved with the Internet do not all agree on which party bears the most responsibility for the collapse of the Internet stock “bubble.”
Correct, the entrepreneur, investment banker and moderator all blame others for the bubbleC. Of all parties involved with the Internet, financial professionals such as investment bankers and fund managers derived the most profits from the stock “bubble.”
NoD. The Internet stock “bubble” could not have occurred if entrepreneurs had been honest about the true financial prospects of their companies.
NoE. The average investor has no one to blame but himself or herself if he or she invested in an Internet stock without adequately understanding the true financial prospects of the companies in question.
No3. Which of the following best captures the meaning of the simile attributed to Mickelson that Verhofen “was like a fox in a henhouse blaming the rooster for all the dead chickens”?
A. As an entrepreneur, Mickelson understands that similes and other figures of speech can help convey complex ideas to audiences.
Question asks for meaning of simile and the reason why mickelson used simileB. Verhofen, as an investment banker, was personally responsible for promoting businesses that he knew were not viable from a long-term perspective.
More of personal attack, whereas Mickelson wanted to blame the investment banker community for the bubbleC. Foxes, unlike roosters, have no legitimate business in henhouses, and are far more likely than roosters to kill chickens.
Explains the simileD. As an investment banker, Verhofen was more likely to be the culprit of the crime than those he identified as responsible.
CorrectE. Entrepreneurs cannot be blamed for trying to make money for themselves and other people because that is what they do.
Not linked to the simile mentioned in the question4. If Mickelson had not used the example of the Wright brothers in her argument, what other example might have illustrated her point as well?
A. Despite widespread public opinion that the sun revolves around the earth, Galileo Galilei published findings showing that the earth revolved around the sun; he later
retracted this assertion as a result of pressure from the Church.
B. A tobacco company chose to market cigarettes to children despite widespread
public opinion that such marketing is unethical; over the following decade, the company expanded its share of the tobacco market.
C. A home electronics company devoted substantial development resources to eight track audio technology despite widespread industry opinion that cassette tapes were the wave of the future;
eight-tracks were soon replaced by cassette tapes, which in turn were replaced by compact disks.
D. A newspaper chose to publish a story that
government lawyers said it could not print; the newspaper won its case against the government lawyers in a federal court, and the writer of the story won a Pulitzer Prize.
E. A computer company initiated research into manufacturing a computer for home use when widespread public opinion held that computers could be useful only for large corporations or government agencies; personal home computers became a multi billion dollar market.
- correct, inspite of widespread opinion the idea became a hit5. If Verhofen’s arguments and statements are all correct, which of the following statements can accurately be inferred?
A. Biotechnology executives who aggressively raise investment capital for bioengineered products with no conceivable market should be held responsible if biotechnology stocks crash.
- correct,people who take up business idea that is not viable should be blamed for the lossB. Investors should make financial decisions only with the advice of qualified financial advisors, such as investment bankers or fund managers.
C. If people lose money on investments that they inadequately researched, they have only themselves to blame.
D. If insurance companies provide home insurance for homes built in a hurricane zone and those homes are subsequently all destroyed by a major hurricane, the insurance company should be blamed for any investment losses suffered by its shareholders.
E. The collapse of Internet stocks would not have occurred if companies had not attempted to sell bulky items, like dog food, over the Internet.