Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 17:03 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 17:03
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,766
Own Kudos:
51,939
 [13]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,766
Kudos: 51,939
 [13]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,766
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,766
Kudos: 51,939
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,766
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,766
Kudos: 51,939
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

4. The author of the passage proposes that writers and artists

Difficulty Level: Hard

Explanation

The author proposes that until society changes its value system (which he does not foresee) the artist and writer must compromise as best they can with the existing system without, however, debasing their work.

Answer: A
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,766
Own Kudos:
51,939
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,766
Kudos: 51,939
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

1. The author implies that writers are

Difficulty Level: 650

Explanation

This expression is found throughout the passage, “. . . when a poet has put his heart . . . into a poem, and sold it to a magazine, the scandal is greater. . . .”

Answer: E
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 137
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Posts: 506
Kudos: 216
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sajjad Can you please provide a detailed explanation of all the questions?. I didn't understand the explanation already mentioned. It would be great if you also provide the analysis of the passage, like the summary, tone, and purpose, etc.
Sajjad1994
Literature is at once the most intimate and the most articulate of the arts. It cannot impart its effect through the senses or the nerves as the other arts can; it is beautiful only through the intelligence; it is the mind speaking to the mind; until it has been put into absolute terms, of an invariable significance, it does not exist at all. It cannot awaken this emotion in one, and that in another; if it fails to express precisely the meaning of the author, if it does not say him, it says nothing, and is nothing. So that when a poet has put his heart, much or little, into a poem, and sold it to a magazine, the scandal is greater than when a painter has sold a picture to a patron, or a sculptor has modeled a statue to order. These are artists less articulate and less intimate than the poet; they are more exterior to their work; they are less personally in it; they part with less of themselves in the dicker. It does not change the nature of the case to say that Tennyson and Longfellow and Emerson sold the poems in which they couched the most mystical messages their genius was charged to bear mankind. They submitted to the conditions which none can escape; but that does not justify the conditions, which are nonetheless the conditions of hucksters because they are imposed upon poets. If it will serve to make my meaning a little clearer, we will suppose that a poet has been crossed in love, or has suffered some real sorrow, like the loss of a wife or child. He pours out his broken heart in verse that shall bring tears of sacred sympathy from his readers, and an editor pays him a hundred dollars for the right of bringing his verse to their notice. It is perfectly true that the poem was not written for these dollars, but it is perfectly true that it was sold for them.

1. The author implies that writers are

(A) incompetent in business.
(B) not sufficiently paid for their work.
(C) greedy.
(D) hucksters.
(E) profiting against their will.


2. A possible title that best expresses the meaning of the passage would be

(A) “The Man of Letters as a Man of Business”
(B) “Literature and the Arts”
(C) “Progress in Literature”
(D) “Poets and Writers”
(E) “The State of the Arts”



3. By accepting payment for works of literature or art, its creators are

I. writing and painting solely for monetary gain.
II. justifying the practice of art.
III. exchanging their work for remuneration.

(A) I only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III


4. The author of the passage proposes that writers and artists

(A) make the best out of a bad situation.
(B) attempt to induce society to change its values.
(C) withhold their work until they gain recognition.
(D) adopt the principles of commercialism.
(E) adopt the value system of society.


RC Butler 2022 - Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.
Passage # 94 Date: 04-Mar-2022
This question is a part of RC Butler 2022. Click here for Details
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,033
Own Kudos:
11,388
 [2]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,033
Kudos: 11,388
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Literature is at once the most intimate and the most articulate of the arts. It cannot impart its effect through the senses or the nerves as the other arts can; it is beautiful only through the intelligence; it is the mind speaking to the mind; until it has been put into absolute terms, of an invariable significance, it does not exist at all. It cannot awaken this emotion in one, and that in another; if it fails to express precisely the meaning of the author, if it does not say him, it says nothing, and is nothing. So that when a poet has put his heart, much or little, into a poem, and sold it to a magazine, the scandal is greater than when a painter has sold a picture to a patron, or a sculptor has modeled a statue to order. These are artists less articulate and less intimate than the poet; they are more exterior to their work; they are less personally in it; they part with less of themselves in the dicker. It does not change the nature of the case to say that Tennyson and Longfellow and Emerson sold the poems in which they couched the most mystical messages their genius was charged to bear mankind. They submitted to the conditions which none can escape; but that does not justify the conditions, which are nonetheless the conditions of hucksters because they are imposed upon poets. If it will serve to make my meaning a little clearer, we will suppose that a poet has been crossed in love, or has suffered some real sorrow, like the loss of a wife or child. He pours out his broken heart in verse that shall bring tears of sacred sympathy from his readers, and an editor pays him a hundred dollars for the right of bringing his verse to their notice. It is perfectly true that the poem was not written for these dollars, but it is perfectly true that it was sold for them.

The passage argues that literature is the most personal and intellectual art form, requiring exact expression of the author's meaning. It contends that when poets sell their deeply personal work, they engage in a commercial transaction that conflicts with the intimate nature of their art. The author states that even great poets submit to these market conditions, but this does not make the conditions; it merely means artists are forced to operate within a system that treats their work as a commodity.

1. The author implies that writers are

(A) incompetent in business.
(B) not sufficiently paid for their work.
(C) greedy.
(D) hucksters.
(E) profiting against their will.

The passage emphasizes that writers submit to commercial conditions "which none can escape," and that selling a poem written from personal sorrow is a transaction that happens despite the work's intimate origins. This implies they profit from necessity, not desire.

Answer: (E)

2. A possible title that best expresses the meaning of the passage would be

(A) “The Man of Letters as a Man of Business”
(B) “Literature and the Arts”
(C) “Progress in Literature”
(D) “Poets and Writers”
(E) “The State of the Arts”

The passage's core theme is the tension between the intimate nature of literary creation and its inevitable treatment as a commercial commodity, exploring the writer's dual role as artist and businessperson.

Answer: (A)

3. By accepting payment for works of literature or art, its creators are

I. writing and painting solely for monetary gain.
II. justifying the practice of art.
III. exchanging their work for remuneration.

(A) I only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

The passage states a work may not be written *for* money but is sold for money, which is simply an exchange (III). It explicitly says this does not justify the commercial conditions (II is false), and it argues against the idea that creation is solely for gain (I is false).

Answer: (B)

4. The author of the passage proposes that writers and artists

(A) make the best out of a bad situation.
(B) attempt to induce society to change its values.
(C) withhold their work until they gain recognition.
(D) adopt the principles of commercialism.
(E) adopt the value system of society.

The author states creators "submitted to the conditions which none can escape," portraying it as an unavoidable compromise rather than an endorsement. This matches the idea of making the best of a bad, inescapable situation.

Answer: (A)

AbhishekP220108
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,766
Own Kudos:
51,939
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,766
Kudos: 51,939
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbhishekP220108
sajjad Can you please provide a detailed explanation of all the questions?. I didn't understand the explanation already mentioned. It would be great if you also provide the analysis of the passage, like the summary, tone, and purpose, etc.

Hello AbhishekP220108

Summary
The author of the passage says literature is most close and clear art because it speaks mind to mind, not by senses. When poet sells his personal heart-feeling poem to magazine, it is more bad than when painter or sculptor sells their work. Poet is more inside his art. Even great poets sold their mystical poems because they must follow the system but this system is like sellers’ system, forced on poets. For Example poet writes of his sadness, gets paid by editor; poem not made for money but sold for money.

Tone
The tone of the passage is critic and a little angry. Writer sees problem and feels it is wrong that poets must sell deep feelings.

Purpose
The purpose is to show how selling poems makes intimate art into product, and that poets are pushed into business role even if they not wish it.

The explanation is posted here, Let me know if you still have any questions.

Good Luck!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts