solarzj
The first United States Solicitor General, Benjamin H. Bristow
born in 1832 and served in the Grant administration from 1874 to 1876. Earlier in his life, Bristow had served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25th Kentucky Infantry.
(A) born in 1832 and served in the Grant administration from 1874 to 1876. Earlier in his life, Bristow had served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25th Kentucky Infantry
(B) was born in 1832 and had served in the Grant administration from 1874 to 1876. Earlier in his life, Bristow served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25'h Kentucky Infantry
(C) born in 1832 and appointee in the Grant administration from 1874 to 1875. Earlier in his life, Bristow served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25th Kentucky Infantry
(D) was born in 1832 and served in the Grand administration from 1874 to 1876. Earlier in his life, Bristow had served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25th Kentucky Infantry
(E) as born in 1832 and served in the Grand administration from 1874 to 1876. Tarlier in his life, Bristow served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25th Kentucky fanny
I think the last option should read
(E)
was born in 1832 and served in the Grand administration from 1874 to 1876.
Earlier in his life, Bristow served as a lieutenant colonel in the 25th Kentucky fanny[/quote]
Then option E is the right answer. Assuming option E has the changes above,
We would use the past perfect tense if we need to clearly establish a sequence of events which otherwise would be unclear/non obvious in the sentence.
ex: I had left the party when the murder happened.
This indicates that the action -- leaving the party happened before the murder. The "had left" past perfect tense is critical in establishing this sequence.In the given sentence since timelines are explicitly stated, the sequence of events are very obvious. There is no need to use the past perfect tense. The preference would be to use simple past.
Looking at the options:
We can quickly eliminate A,B and D as they use "had served" in one format or the other. We are left with C and E.
Sentence C can be a run on without the "was" after the comma. So we can eliminate C as well. It also uses the "appointee" instead of "served".
Right answer is E.