Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 23:51 It is currently 01 May 2026, 23:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATPill
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Last visit: 17 Sep 2020
Posts: 2,260
Own Kudos:
3,853
 [17]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,260
Kudos: 3,853
 [17]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 571
Own Kudos:
4,535
 [6]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 571
Kudos: 4,535
 [6]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
amitbharadwaj7
Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Last visit: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
159
 [2]
Given Kudos: 60
Status:Joining Cranfield Sep 2014
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 530 Q50 V14
GMAT 2: 630 Q48 V29
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 2: 630 Q48 V29
Posts: 39
Kudos: 159
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vishnuns39620
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Last visit: 30 Mar 2021
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
Status:Admitted to U of M Ross
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 2.9
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It could only be option A!

3 of the 5 had errors like "a struggling " which immediately rule out C,D,& E.

Option B is wrong because it ends with "and are" instead of the correct form " , are "
avatar
AMITAGARWAL2
Joined: 06 Jul 2013
Last visit: 08 May 2014
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
Posts: 71
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think rule rule here is other choices are worst so go with A.

I do not get the explianation of subject - verb error of B...
User avatar
amitbharadwaj7
Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Last visit: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Status:Joining Cranfield Sep 2014
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 530 Q50 V14
GMAT 2: 630 Q48 V29
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 2: 630 Q48 V29
Posts: 39
Kudos: 159
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
blueseas
AMITAGARWAL2
I think rule rule here is other choices are worst so go with A.

I do not get the explianation of subject - verb error of B...

hi amit,

in the original sentence HIGHLITED part is a modifier....set between the commas.
and after the modifier VERB are==>is acting as a verb for the subject economists....which is correct.

Many economists believe that policy officials at the Federal Reserve,now seeing the economy as struggling with negative growth and high inflation, are almost certain to implement further rounds of quantitative easing in the near future.

now if you just fit option B the original sentence becomes:

Many economists believe that policy officials at the Federal Reserve,now seeing the economy to be struggling with negative growth and high inflation and are almost certain to implement further rounds of quantitative easing in the near future.

in this option...the part starting with now seeing the economy....is acting as modifier..moreover because of the removal of comma before are..that part is also coming under MODIFIER part....hence the verb for the subject IS MISSING...
thats the major ERROR in this part.

hope it helps

Great Explaination. I agree with you.
User avatar
Amit0507
Joined: 26 May 2013
Last visit: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 41
Kudos: 78
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question might sound stupid but I thought a modifier is linked to the Noun before a comma. And in this case, Federal reserve is the NOUN, hence adding 'who' will create the correct linkage.
Please clarify.

Thanks,
Amit
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 571
Own Kudos:
4,535
 [1]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 571
Kudos: 4,535
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amit0507
This question might sound stupid but I thought a modifier is linked to the Noun before a comma. And in this case, Federal reserve is the NOUN, hence adding 'who' will create the correct linkage.
Please clarify.

Thanks,
Amit

Hi,

WHO and WHOM===>they can only modify human beings...and ....reverse is also true...human beings can only be modified by WHO and WHOM.

if you modify human beings using THAT /WHICH==>this will always bewrong.

now in this question.

federal reserve===>this is NOT a human being...hence we cant use WHO after that.

hope it helps
User avatar
Amit0507
Joined: 26 May 2013
Last visit: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 41
Kudos: 78
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
blueseas
Amit0507
This question might sound stupid but I thought a modifier is linked to the Noun before a comma. And in this case, Federal reserve is the NOUN, hence adding 'who' will create the correct linkage.
Please clarify.

Thanks,
Amit

Hi,

WHO and WHOM===>they can only modify human beings...and ....reverse is also true...human beings can only be modified by WHO and WHOM.

if you modify human beings using THAT /WHICH==>this will always bewrong.

now in this question.

federal reserve===>this is NOT a human being...hence we cant use WHO after that.

hope it helps

Hi,
Here I guess we are referring to Policy officials (not Federal Reserve)...... who see the economy ....... This prompted me to raise this doubt.
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 571
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 571
Kudos: 4,535
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amit0507
]



Hi,
Here I guess we are referring to Policy officials (not Federal Reserve)...... who see the economy ....... This prompted me to raise this doubt.

Many economists believe that policy officials at the Federal Reserve, now seeingthe economy as struggling with negative growth and high inflation, are almost certain to implement further rounds of quantitative easing in the near future.

meaning of the sentence is:
MANY ECONOMIST ==>THEY ARE SEEING THE ECONOMY...and not the policy officials..
now as economist see this economy is struggling...based on this econmist believe that policy officials ==>are almost certain to implement......
this is the intended meaning


how to understand.==>whenever you see...comma +verb-ing==>then this modifier modifies the whole clause...and not the previous noun
in this case it is COMMA NOW SEEING==>hence this modifies whole clause hence the subject of the previous clause tooo.

moreover WHO always refer to nearest noun....it will not jump over one noun..as you said meaning wise it is refering to policy officials.
so if it is placed after federal reserve it is going to modify FEDERAL RESERVE ...and will not jump to policy officials



hope it helps
User avatar
Amit0507
Joined: 26 May 2013
Last visit: 15 Aug 2016
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 41
Kudos: 78
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
blueseas
Amit0507
]



Hi,
Here I guess we are referring to Policy officials (not Federal Reserve)...... who see the economy ....... This prompted me to raise this doubt.

Many economists believe that policy officials at the Federal Reserve, now seeingthe economy as struggling with negative growth and high inflation, are almost certain to implement further rounds of quantitative easing in the near future.

meaning of the sentence is:
MANY ECONOMIST ==>THEY ARE SEEING THE ECONOMY...and not the policy officials..
now as economist see this economy is struggling...based on this econmist believe that policy officials ==>are almost certain to implement......
this is the intended meaning


how to understand.==>whenever you see...comma +verb-ing==>then this modifier modifies the whole clause...and not the previous noun
in this case it is COMMA NOW SEEING==>hence this modifies whole clause hence the subject of the previous clause tooo.

moreover WHO always refer to nearest noun....it will not jump over one noun..as you said meaning wise it is refering to policy officials.
so if it is placed after federal reserve it is going to modify FEDERAL RESERVE ...and will not jump to policy officials



hope it helps
Hi,
Thanks for the response, but I do not agree with your explanation for 2 reasons:
1. Who and whom are used to describe humans only, so no way it will refer to 'Federal reserve'
2. As per your explanation, Economists BELIEVE and SEE in this sentence which I guess is a wrong inference.

Thanks,
Amit
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 571
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 571
Kudos: 4,535
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amit0507
blueseas
Amit0507
]



Hi,
Here I guess we are referring to Policy officials (not Federal Reserve)...... who see the economy ....... This prompted me to raise this doubt.

Many economists believe that policy officials at the Federal Reserve, now seeingthe economy as struggling with negative growth and high inflation, are almost certain to implement further rounds of quantitative easing in the near future.

meaning of the sentence is:
MANY ECONOMIST ==>THEY ARE SEEING THE ECONOMY...and not the policy officials..
now as economist see this economy is struggling...based on this econmist believe that policy officials ==>are almost certain to implement......
this is the intended meaning


how to understand.==>whenever you see...comma +verb-ing==>then this modifier modifies the whole clause...and not the previous noun
in this case it is COMMA NOW SEEING==>hence this modifies whole clause hence the subject of the previous clause tooo.

moreover WHO always refer to nearest noun....it will not jump over one noun..as you said meaning wise it is refering to policy officials.
so if it is placed after federal reserve it is going to modify FEDERAL RESERVE ...and will not jump to policy officials



hope it helps
Hi,
Thanks for the response, but I do not agree with your explanation for 2 reasons:
1. Who and whom are used to describe humans only, so no way it will refer to 'Federal reserve'
2. As per your explanation, Economists BELIEVE and SEE in this sentence which I guess is a wrong inference.

Thanks,
Amit
PLEASE REFER THESE.

https://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoVwhVt.asp
usage-of-verb-ing-modifiers-135220.html

HOPE IT HELPS
avatar
april427
Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Last visit: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey guys, it's my first time to use the GMATPILL, I was wondering how I can know if my answer is corrent or not? It seems that I can only see the QUESTIOM STATS above the question stem.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,432
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,432
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
513 posts
363 posts