Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 23:48 It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 23:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,994
Own Kudos:
812,022
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,957
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,994
Kudos: 812,022
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,994
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,957
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,994
Kudos: 812,022
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
SonalSinha803
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 303
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 303
Kudos: 324
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
pikolo2510
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 435
Own Kudos:
791
 [3]
Given Kudos: 294
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 435
Kudos: 791
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed. ---> Pronoun error. "Cats" is plural whereas "it" is singular. INCORRECT

B. the cat changed little in the millions of years of its existence. ---> We need to show continuity here by saying that since millions of years, there has been little change. The verb "has" is missing. The current sentence changes the meaning. INCORRECT

C. the cat has changed little in the millions of years it was existing. ---> "was existing" ? The cat is still alive today per the meaning of the sentence. INCORRECT

D. the cat has changed little in the millions of years of its existence. ---> Everything looks fine. CORRECT

E. little has changed for the cat in the millions of years of its existence. ---> little cannot be the subject for the modifier "Highly adaptive and in no danger of extinction". We need the noun "the cat" . INCORRECT

Answer is D
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
42,465
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D for maintaining the subject-pronoun agreement and for using the correct verb-tense form of present perfect
avatar
Sdpl0118
Joined: 01 May 2018
Last visit: 03 Jul 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Hong Kong
GMAT 1: 720 Q47 V42
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q47 V42
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer B would make more sense/be trickier if it's referring to a species that no longer exists.
User avatar
tejyr
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Last visit: 24 Dec 2021
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 109
Products:
Posts: 111
Kudos: 95
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
H i daagh / experts,
B vs d .Both are grammatically correct.
But Can any one clearly explain why d can be appearing correct in the context.
How can we know if cat is still changing in present or not.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
pikolo2510
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 435
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 294
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 435
Kudos: 791
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tejyr
H i daagh / experts,
B vs d .Both are grammatically correct.
But Can any one clearly explain why d can be appearing correct in the context.
How can we know if cat is still changing in present or not.

Posted from my mobile device

Hey,

you can read my explanation above over here

Adding to the above, the sentence mentions "in no danger of extinction" which means the cat is still alive today. Rather it is plenty in number. So we need to talk about something that is true in the past and also very much true today. Only the present perfect tense does that.

Hence option D
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,262
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,262
Kudos: 42,465
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Between B and D.

IMO, B is not correct both grammatically and semantically. We do need a present perfect tense verb to transmit the sense of an organism that is still in existence. That is the intention of this sentence. A simple past tense would mean that cats no longer live on this earth like the dinosaurs. Grammar's purpose is to bring out clarity and reality


Evolutionary changes are not that visible. Not just cat, but take other organisms on the earth including human beings; they all keep evolving silently. We only don't see them or feel those changes. No one can overrule Einstein in this matter who said" change is permanent on this earth"
User avatar
sumitkrocks
Joined: 02 Jul 2017
Last visit: 22 Aug 2023
Posts: 637
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Posts: 637
Kudos: 879
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Highly adaptive and in no danger of extinction, cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed.


A. cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed.
Pronoun it is wrongly referring to plural antecedent Cats. INCORRECT

B. the cat changed little in the millions of years of its existence.
No verb for the subject cat , changed here is acting as a modifier ..meaning is distorted and it's no more a valid sentence INCORRECT

C. the cat has changed little in the millions of years it was existing.
meaning is not as intended in the original sentence ...it means cats do not exist anymore . INCORRECT


D. the cat has changed little in the millions of years of its existence.

It corrects the error in the original sentence .CORRECT

E. little has changed for the cat in the millions of years of its existence.
Phrase modifier is modifying "Little" INCORRECT

Please consider giving a Kudos ,if my work helps :cool: :thumbup: Good Luck
User avatar
Hero8888
Joined: 29 Dec 2017
Last visit: 14 Apr 2019
Posts: 299
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 273
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.25
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V37
Posts: 299
Kudos: 348
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SonalSinha803
B and D are contenders. Rest have incorrect structures.

Coming to D I really don't understand why should we need D. B conveys the meaning without the use of "has". Thus, I would go for B.

Posted from my mobile device

Hi, SonalSinha803

The action "has changed little" started in the past and is still in effect, thus present perfect is requered.
avatar
SajjitaKundu
Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Feb 2019
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V31
Posts: 109
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO the answer is D, only that brings out the correct meaning. The cats are still existing and they are still evolving, hence, the use present perfect.
User avatar
prathi123
Joined: 13 Feb 2017
Last visit: 16 Sep 2018
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 31
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Highly adaptive and in no danger of extinction, cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed.


A. cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed. incorrect due to mismatch of singular and plural noun

B. the cat changed little in the millions of years of its existence. incorrect due to usage of past tense

C. the cat has changed little in the millions of years it was existing. incorrect

D. the cat has changed little in the millions of years of its existence. correct

E. little has changed for the cat in the millions of years of its existence. incorrect
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,911
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Highly adaptive and in no danger of extinction, cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed.


A. cats have changed little in the millions of years that it has existed.

B. the cat changed little in the millions of years of its existence.

C. the cat has changed little in the millions of years it was existing.

D. the cat has changed little in the millions of years of its existence.

E. little has changed for the cat in the millions of years of its existence.
In A, it (singular) does not agree with cats (plural).
Eliminate A.

B: the cat changed little in the millions of years of its existence
Since changed expresses an action performed by the cat IN THE PAST, the implication is that the modifier for this verb -- in the millions of years of its existence -- also refers to the past.
As a result, B conveys that the cat NO LONGER EXISTS.
This meaning is nonsensical, given the vast number of cat videos on YouTube.
Eliminate B.

C: the cat has changed little in the millions of years it was existing
Here, it refers to the cat.
As a result, it was existing conveys that the cat no longer exists -- a nonsensical meaning, as discussed above.
Eliminate C.

E: Highly adaptive and in no danger of extinction, little has changed
Here, the phrase in red seems to refer to little -- the subject of the following clause -- implying that LITTLE is highly adaptive and in no danger of extinction.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate E.

User avatar
ArtVandaley
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Last visit: 05 Feb 2022
Posts: 285
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 285
Kudos: 431
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shouldnt it be "a cat" rather than "the cat"?

It feels like we are talking about a specific cat which existed for million years.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,908
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,908
Kudos: 3,586
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
darshak1
Shouldnt it be "a cat" rather than "the cat"?

It feels like we are talking about a specific cat which existed for million years.
Some people may have exactly the same comment about the usage of a cat:)

I haven't seen GMAT ever testing you on articles (a/an/the) though.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,426
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,426
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
509 posts
363 posts