OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
THE PROMPTQuote:
Rebuilding and levee development
have permitted the seacoast town with increasing its tourist visitation over the past few months and to reallocate the budget surplus as a result.
• Subject: compound.
Two events happened: (1) rebuilding [of the town] and (2) development of the levee.
• Idiom
→ The correct idiom is
permitted to [do XYZ]
There is no such thing as
permitted with [do XYZ].
Permitted for [do XYZ] is also not idiomatic.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) have permitted the seacoast town
with increasing its tourist visitation over the past few months and to reallocate
• lack of parallelism
→ The verb
permit takes direct objects—in this case, an increase in tourists and a reallocation of its budget
→ But the direct objects, joined by and, are not parallel.
With increasing . . . and
to reallocate are not parallel
• Idiom error and nonsensical
→ There is no such thing as
permitted with.We say that X is
permitted to do ABC.
• nonsensical
→ What on earth is
permitted . . . with increasing its tourist visitation?
Never mind the idiom error. Quite aside from it, the language makes no sense.
ELIMINATE A
Quote:
B)
has permitted the seacoast town to increase its tourist visitation over the past few months and to reallocate
• subject/verb error
The compound subject
rebuilding and levee development requires the plural verb
have, not the singular verb
has.ELIMINATE B
Quote:
C) have permitted the seacoast town to increase its tourist visitation over the past few months and to reallocate
• I do not see any errors
• the compound subject requires the plural verb
have permitted•
permitted TO is the correct idiom
•
to increase . . . and
to reallocate are parallel
KEEP
Quote:
D)
has permitted the seacoast town
with increasing its tourist visitation over the past few months, and it is reallocating
• subject/verb agreement
→ same problem as that in option B
• idiom error
→ same problem as that in option A
ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) have
permitted for the seacoast town
to increase its tourist visitation over the past few months as well as
reallocating• idiom error and mixup
→
permitted for is not correct
→
permitted to is correct
→ often,
allowed for is correct; the authors may be trying to hook people with this idiom.
• lack of parallelism
→
to increase and
reallocating are not parallel
The town can now do two things. Those things should be parallel because they are objects of the verb
permit.
As well as does not require quite as strict a level of parallelism as does the word
and, but if
as well as is acting like the word
and, parallel construction is preferred.
ELIMINATE E
The answer is C.COMMENTSppy , welcome to SC Butler.
These answers are very good; the whole thread is worth reading to get different perspectives and analysis.
I actually have too many contenders—at least 4—for Best Community Reply.
Nicely done!