Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 11:28 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 11:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,772
Own Kudos:
51,923
 [10]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,772
Kudos: 51,923
 [10]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,772
Own Kudos:
51,923
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,772
Kudos: 51,923
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
nks2611
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 89
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE:Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
Posts: 188
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,847
Own Kudos:
9,184
 [1]
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,847
Kudos: 9,184
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nks2611
confused btw B&E ,can someone explain why we should not go with E although it looks peachy but still unable to eliminate it , please shed your light on it

Break the argument down -

some of the income used for housing and entertainment costs by single professionals can be used by married professionals for other purchases. --> Married professionals have more money to spend on discretionary purchases


What does this imply? Probably that they do not incur as much housing and entertainment costs. (why else will they have this advantage?)

We have to look for an answer that suggests this. Option B does this perfectly.

Option E - Incorrect.
"Housing and entertainment costs account for the largest proportion of a single professional’s expenditures." - Even if it does not account for the largest proportion (let's say it does not account for 60%, but only 30%), married professionals still do have more money to spend on discretionary purchases.

Hence, it is not required for those costs to be the "largest" proportion of expenditures.

Option A - Incorrect.
"Married professionals have more money to spend on discretionary purchases" - does not mean that they WILL spend more money on those purchases.

Option C - Incorrect.
We cannot infer anything about this group - "Couples that live together but are not married".

Option D - Incorrect.
We cannot infer anything about "incomes".
User avatar
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 235
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 235
Kudos: 108
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackVerbalGMAT
nks2611
confused btw B&E ,can someone explain why we should not go with E although it looks peachy but still unable to eliminate it , please shed your light on it

Break the argument down -

some of the income used for housing and entertainment costs by single professionals can be used by married professionals for other purchases. --> Married professionals have more money to spend on discretionary purchases


What does this imply? Probably that they do not incur housing and entertainment costs. (why else will they have this advantage?)

We have to look for an answer that suggests this. Option B does this perfectly.

Option E - Incorrect.
"Housing and entertainment costs account for the largest proportion of a single professional’s expenditures." - Even if it does not account for the largest proportion (let's say it does not account for 60%, but only 30%), married professionals still do have more money to spend on discretionary purchases.

Hence, it is not required for those costs to be the "largest" proportion of expenditures.

Option A - Incorrect.
"Married professionals have more money to spend on discretionary purchases" - does not mean that they WILL spend more money on those purchases.

Option C - Incorrect.
We cannot infer anything about this group - "Couples that live together but are not married".

Option D - Incorrect.
We cannot infer anything about "incomes".

I have a problem with this question ! How can we infer that the housing costs are less than what singles incur. Perhaps it could be same. And they could have more money to spare because both the partners are earning .
The only thing we can infer is that two people living together will have lesser costs .

Please clarify this.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,847
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,847
Kudos: 9,184
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goforgmat


I have a problem with this question ! How can we infer that the housing costs are less than what singles incur. Perhaps it could be same. And they could have more money to spare because both the partners are earning .
The only thing we can infer is that two people living together will have lesser costs .

Please clarify this.

It talks about those with "comparable income", that's why
User avatar
nazgull
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2016
Last visit: 16 Oct 2024
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 26
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
goforgmat
CrackVerbalGMAT
nks2611
confused btw B&E ,can someone explain why we should not go with E although it looks peachy but still unable to eliminate it , please shed your light on it

Break the argument down -

some of the income used for housing and entertainment costs by single professionals can be used by married professionals for other purchases. --> Married professionals have more money to spend on discretionary purchases


What does this imply? Probably that they do not incur housing and entertainment costs. (why else will they have this advantage?)

We have to look for an answer that suggests this. Option B does this perfectly.

Option E - Incorrect.
"Housing and entertainment costs account for the largest proportion of a single professional’s expenditures." - Even if it does not account for the largest proportion (let's say it does not account for 60%, but only 30%), married professionals still do have more money to spend on discretionary purchases.

Hence, it is not required for those costs to be the "largest" proportion of expenditures.

Option A - Incorrect.
"Married professionals have more money to spend on discretionary purchases" - does not mean that they WILL spend more money on those purchases.

Option C - Incorrect.
We cannot infer anything about this group - "Couples that live together but are not married".

Option D - Incorrect.
We cannot infer anything about "incomes".

I have a problem with this question ! How can we infer that the housing costs are less than what singles incur. Perhaps it could be same. And they could have more money to spare because both the partners are earning .
The only thing we can infer is that two people living together will have lesser costs .

Please clarify this.

This is how I understand it:

Married professionals spend more money on discretionary purposes than single ones.
Both groups have comparable incomes.
Single professional's share of cost on 'housing and entertainment' is used by Married group for discretionary purposes.

A. From question stem we only know that they have MORE money. Do they really spend more money? Is this option TRUE in all scenarios? - NO
C. Question stem doen't talk about couples but only about married professionals. Maybe both husband and wife live separately or maybe not. Is this option TRUE in all scenarios? - NO
D. Question stem clearly mentions that income is comparable. We don't have any other statistical data. Is this option TRUE in all scenarios? - NO
E. As per the argument Married professional can use the same share for discretionary purposes. Does it account for largest proportion for single professional's expenditures? Is this option TRUE in all scenarios? - NO

Hence B is the right choice.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts