Plan: Ban on the outdoor deliberate fire.
Anticipated Outcome: Negligible forest Fire
Reasoning: Find a possibility in which forest fires can be attributed to something other than deliberate Outdoor fire.
A. Most of the tourists who visit the forests surrounding Enderton also visit Enderton itself.
OUT OF SCOPE: as the statement does not mention about deliberate fire set by the tourists.
B. Although there are county fire fighters available to combat forest fires in the area, Enderton
itself has no professional fire fighters and deliberate Outdoor fire.
OUT OF SCOPE: the statement does not focus on the cause effect relation of forest fire and
C. Very few forest fires in the Enderton area result from fires deliberately set by arsonists.
BAIT: though the statement supposedly attributes a few forest fires to deliberately set by arsonists, it has baited the reader on the word "arsonists", the term defined for group of people ( culprits) who deliberately set the property of other people on fire. Hence, the answer failed to consider all the people who set fire outside , though deliberately, for barbecues and other entertainment.
D. Nearly all forest fires in the Enderton area are the result of lightning strikes.
Yup a true cause effect : Right answer.
E. The number of forest fires in the Enderton area has not increased significantly in the last
several years.
OUT OF SCOPE: the statement does not focus on the cause effect relation of forest fire and
REgds
Sid