Category: Assumption
Known Information:
Yersiniosis affects both dog and human
The vaccine available is in form of nasal spray.
Challenges:
Pet owners are unwilling to put their dogs through nasal spray vaccine.
Proposed Solution:
A new vaccine that can be administered orally for dogs.
Stated conclusion:
Yersiniosis is not severe in dogs , so inoculation of dogs using oral vaccine will not have significant public health benefit.
The stated conclusion state that even if the dogs are not inoculated , it wont affect general public health. Does that mean the infection in human and dogs are unrelated ? We need to find the answer choice that explains this.
A Any person who has received the nasal-spray vaccine can safely receive the oral vaccine as well -
This does not talk about oral vaccine for dogs - Irrelevant.B Yersiniosis is one of the most common diseases that affect pet dogs - Again this does not give information for our question. -
Not the right choice.
C The oral vaccine is less expensive than the nasal-spray vaccine -
Out of scope - we are not talking about price here. D Humans do not contract yersiniosis primarily from dogs that have yersiniosis -
If Humans do not contact disease from dogs , then not inoculating dogs will not have any impact on the public health benefit. This is the most logical choice we have seen till now. E The oral and nasal-spray vaccines are equally effective -
Again , this does not give information on how not inoculating dogs does not affect public health.
Ans: D