nightblade354
Politician: It is wrong for the government to restrict the liberty of individuals, except perhaps in those cases when to fail to do so would allow individuals to cause harm. Yet, to publish something is a liberty, and to offend is not to cause harm.
Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the politician's statements?
A) It is not right for the government to restrict the publication of literature that is only offensive
B) It is not wrong for the government to restrict individuals' liberty when failing to do so would allow individuals to cause harm
C) It is offensive for the government to restrict the liberty of individuals to publish, but it is not harmful
D) It is not wrong for individuals to publish literature that is offensive
E) It is not right for the government to restrict the publication of literature that does not cause serious harm
It is wrong for Govt to restrict liberty (except perhaps in those cases when individuals could cause harm).
To publish something is a liberty.
To offend is not to cause harm.
So we can conclude it is wrong for Govt to restrict publishing (a liberty) if it only offends (which is not harmful). So (A) is correct.
B) It is not wrong for the government to restrict individuals' liberty when failing to do so would allow individuals to cause harm
Note that the argument is not fully convinced about restricting when it can cause harm - "except
perhaps in those cases when individuals could cause harm"
So we cannot conclude that it is not wrong. Perhaps it is not wrong but can we be sure? No.
C) It is offensive for the government to restrict the liberty of individuals to publish, but it is not harmful
The argument does not talk about what is offensive for the government. This is irrelevant.
D) It is not wrong for individuals to publish literature that is offensive
The argument does not talk about whether it is wrong or not. It only talks about whether the Govt restricting liberty is wrong or not.
E) It is not right for the government to restrict the publication of literature that does not cause serious harm
The argument does not talk about "serious" harm.