Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 16:15 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 16:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,329
 [23]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
 [23]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Kuroikami
Joined: 06 Feb 2020
Last visit: 01 Sep 2021
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 165
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,329
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kuroikami
I am writing this before the official answer is released.

I feel the answer is E.

My reasoning is as follows. If an 8 pin key was discovered, it is logical to assume that in 10th century BC, some people would have gone further and tried creating a 12 pin cylinder lock mechanism, provided that the material, which they are using as key, is malleable enough to allow a 12 pin key. I could be wrong. If you think my reasoning is incorrect, or that there is a better answer, please shed some light on the same.

Posted from my mobile device

Your reasoning is good, indeed this is the answer. :thumbup:
Kudos..!!
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You have done quite a job to answer.
But may be you have over-read the question which is indeed about strengthening the argument.

ocelot22
lnm87
The key for a modern 12-pin cylinder lock mechanism – one of the most secure locking mechanisms – has a cylindrical shape with multiple protrusions in various distinct orientations, making it one of the most difficult keys to mold. Recent archaeological excavations in Uganda unravelled a small piece of a key-like structure belonging to the 10th Century B.C. The excavated piece contains 8 pins with orientations of the pins and the shape of the pins similar to that in a 12-pin cylinder key. Archaeologists therefore hypothesize that the 12-pin cylinder lock mechanism has been in existence for more than 3 millennia.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best support for the archaeologists’ hypothesis?

A. The key is made from ivory – a material obtained from the tusks of elephants and the horns of rhinos, animals that were likely to have evolved in Uganda.
B. The cylinder lock mechanism is the most secure locking mechanism that could have been created by Neanderthals given their relatively unevolved intellectual capacity.
C. No lock mechanism that uses a similar cylinder-based mechanism could have existed prior to or around 10th Century B.C.
D. The construction of a cylinder lock and the intricacies behind its workings were definitely known during the 9th Century A.D., a recent evidence suggests.
E. The material used in the key would be malleable enough for creating 12 such distinctly oriented protrusions on the same cylindrical structure.


CR questions are all about addressing assumptions you uncover when diagramming your argument. Lets chart it out real quick

--- > 12 pin lock cylidrical, secure, lots of protrusions
---> Design makes it difficult to mold
---> Archelogists discover part of key like structure with 8 pins similar shape, orientation to 12 pin 10th cent BC
C: 12 pin has been around >3k years

now we have to look for unstated assumptions

One assumption we have to make to accept the conclusion is that this 8 pin piece is not trying to be part of some other design different from the 12 pin

Lets look at answer choices. Any answer choice that address this unstated assumption is a strengthener

A) key is made from ivory, prob from rhnios, evolved in the area - ok so the key is made from materials from the area it was found. This is out of scope. The materials used to make the key are irrelevant. Even if the key was made from materials not native to Uganda, they could have traded for iron, steel etc. notice we have to start introducing other ideas and assumptions - this almost always make the answer incorrect- this is out of scope

B) The cylander is the most secure mechanism Neaderthals could have created: Who cares if it is the most secure the could have created? Who cares if the 12 pin is even the most secure? The argument is about this discovery provign the 12 pin has been around over 3k years - out of scope

C) No other lock cylander mechanism could have existed. Ok, so this is saying that this peice of a lock that was discovered could not have been part of some other type of design. This address our assumption. Looks good

D) Construction and intricacies known 9 AD (notice 2020-900 = 1,120 < 3,000 this is of no help at all - Irelevant

E) The material is malluable enough for 12 protrusions. Ok this is a mild strengthener. The material is such that they could have used the same material to eventually create a 12 pin cylinder, or maybe even the 8 pin piece is actually part of a 12 pin if the cylinder found at the site was whole.

C vs E. Notice we have to introduce a lot of assumptions/ lines of thought in order to accept E as a strengthener, but C address our unstated assumption without any neccessary assumptions / lines of thought. So C should be our correct answer.
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 165
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lnm87
You have done quite a job to answer.
But may be you have over-read the question which is indeed about strengthening the argument.

ocelot22
lnm87
The key for a modern 12-pin cylinder lock mechanism – one of the most secure locking mechanisms – has a cylindrical shape with multiple protrusions in various distinct orientations, making it one of the most difficult keys to mold. Recent archaeological excavations in Uganda unravelled a small piece of a key-like structure belonging to the 10th Century B.C. The excavated piece contains 8 pins with orientations of the pins and the shape of the pins similar to that in a 12-pin cylinder key. Archaeologists therefore hypothesize that the 12-pin cylinder lock mechanism has been in existence for more than 3 millennia.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best support for the archaeologists’ hypothesis?

A. The key is made from ivory – a material obtained from the tusks of elephants and the horns of rhinos, animals that were likely to have evolved in Uganda.
B. The cylinder lock mechanism is the most secure locking mechanism that could have been created by Neanderthals given their relatively unevolved intellectual capacity.
C. No lock mechanism that uses a similar cylinder-based mechanism could have existed prior to or around 10th Century B.C.
D. The construction of a cylinder lock and the intricacies behind its workings were definitely known during the 9th Century A.D., a recent evidence suggests.
E. The material used in the key would be malleable enough for creating 12 such distinctly oriented protrusions on the same cylindrical structure.


CR questions are all about addressing assumptions you uncover when diagramming your argument. Lets chart it out real quick

--- > 12 pin lock cylidrical, secure, lots of protrusions
---> Design makes it difficult to mold
---> Archelogists discover part of key like structure with 8 pins similar shape, orientation to 12 pin 10th cent BC
C: 12 pin has been around >3k years

now we have to look for unstated assumptions

One assumption we have to make to accept the conclusion is that this 8 pin piece is not trying to be part of some other design different from the 12 pin

Lets look at answer choices. Any answer choice that address this unstated assumption is a strengthener

A) key is made from ivory, prob from rhnios, evolved in the area - ok so the key is made from materials from the area it was found. This is out of scope. The materials used to make the key are irrelevant. Even if the key was made from materials not native to Uganda, they could have traded for iron, steel etc. notice we have to start introducing other ideas and assumptions - this almost always make the answer incorrect- this is out of scope

B) The cylander is the most secure mechanism Neaderthals could have created: Who cares if it is the most secure the could have created? Who cares if the 12 pin is even the most secure? The argument is about this discovery provign the 12 pin has been around over 3k years - out of scope

C) No other lock cylander mechanism could have existed. Ok, so this is saying that this peice of a lock that was discovered could not have been part of some other type of design. This address our assumption. Looks good

D) Construction and intricacies known 9 AD (notice 2020-900 = 1,120 < 3,000 this is of no help at all - Irelevant

E) The material is malluable enough for 12 protrusions. Ok this is a mild strengthener. The material is such that they could have used the same material to eventually create a 12 pin cylinder, or maybe even the 8 pin piece is actually part of a 12 pin if the cylinder found at the site was whole.

C vs E. Notice we have to introduce a lot of assumptions/ lines of thought in order to accept E as a strengthener, but C address our unstated assumption without any neccessary assumptions / lines of thought. So C should be our correct answer.

Ok, I see the problem was my misreading of the answer choice C ".No lock mechanism that uses a similar cylinder-based mechanism could have existed prior to or around 10th Century B.C. " That is to say no lock system that was not the 12 pin could have existed <=10th century BC. Ok, so its not for a different key/lock mechanism, but is the finding even a key at all? E: The material could be used to make a 12 pin key. This is a stronger strenghtener than C (Could have been made into a 12 pin > "artifact cant be for some other lock design, (but could be a hair comb for all we know)"

My inaccuracy in my process that led to the wrong answer: Most likely not taking time to come up with a few more pre-phrased assumptions. Also, not reading answer choice C especially carefully and taking more time to translate it into simple enough language for me to fully absorb
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,329
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22

Ok, I see the problem was my misreading of the answer choice C ".No lock mechanism that uses a similar cylinder-based mechanism could have existed prior to or around 10th Century B.C. " That is to say no lock system that was not the 12 pin could have existed <=10th century BC. Ok, so its not for a different key/lock mechanism, but is the finding even a key at all? E: The material could be used to make a 12 pin key. This is a stronger strenghtener than C (Could have been made into a 12 pin > "artifact cant be for some other lock design, (but could be a hair comb for all we know)"

My inaccuracy in my process that led to the wrong answer: Most likely not taking time to come up with a few more pre-phrased assumptions. Also, not reading answer choice C especially carefully and taking more time to translate it into simple enough language for me to fully absorb

Your GMAT scores suggest that you have a good hold on verbal. I won't talk about Quant, you can definitely hit atleast 700 with that Verbal.
What are your plans.?
User avatar
ocelot22
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 545
GMAT 1: 640 Q38 V40
GMAT 2: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 3: 570 Q31 V38
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 4: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 165
Kudos: 137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lnm87
ocelot22

Ok, I see the problem was my misreading of the answer choice C ".No lock mechanism that uses a similar cylinder-based mechanism could have existed prior to or around 10th Century B.C. " That is to say no lock system that was not the 12 pin could have existed <=10th century BC. Ok, so its not for a different key/lock mechanism, but is the finding even a key at all? E: The material could be used to make a 12 pin key. This is a stronger strenghtener than C (Could have been made into a 12 pin > "artifact cant be for some other lock design, (but could be a hair comb for all we know)"

My inaccuracy in my process that led to the wrong answer: Most likely not taking time to come up with a few more pre-phrased assumptions. Also, not reading answer choice C especially carefully and taking more time to translate it into simple enough language for me to fully absorb

Your GMAT scores suggest that you have a good hold on verbal. I won't talk about Quant, you can definitely hit atleast 700 with that Verbal.
What are your plans.?

I have been working on quant and verbal. I had some life issues a couple years ago and my score dropped. My most recent gmat verbal was only v33, (about a year ago). I would say as of today im probably at V37-38. I need to get back up to verbal 40/41 that I was able to score about 10 years ago. My quant has steadilly been improving over the years. I think with a bit more practice I would be able to hit q49, which would give me a score of over 700, that I need to accomplish my goals. My goal is to get into a PhD program in Finance, and then eventually be a college professor (hopefully)
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,329
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ocelot22
lnm87
ocelot22

Ok, I see the problem was my misreading of the answer choice C ".No lock mechanism that uses a similar cylinder-based mechanism could have existed prior to or around 10th Century B.C. " That is to say no lock system that was not the 12 pin could have existed <=10th century BC. Ok, so its not for a different key/lock mechanism, but is the finding even a key at all? E: The material could be used to make a 12 pin key. This is a stronger strenghtener than C (Could have been made into a 12 pin > "artifact cant be for some other lock design, (but could be a hair comb for all we know)"

My inaccuracy in my process that led to the wrong answer: Most likely not taking time to come up with a few more pre-phrased assumptions. Also, not reading answer choice C especially carefully and taking more time to translate it into simple enough language for me to fully absorb

Your GMAT scores suggest that you have a good hold on verbal. I won't talk about Quant, you can definitely hit atleast 700 with that Verbal.
What are your plans.?

I have been working on quant and verbal. I had some life issues a couple years ago and my score dropped. My most recent gmat verbal was only v33, (about a year ago). I would say as of today im probably at V37-38. I need to get back up to verbal 40/41 that I was able to score about 10 years ago. My quant has steadilly been improving over the years. I think with a bit more practice I would be able to hit q49, which would give me a score of over 700, that I need to accomplish my goals. My goal is to get into a PhD program in Finance, and then eventually be a college professor (hopefully)

Great that you have risen again to that level. No many are able to do that. I'm struggling with verbal even after putting around 8 months in it.

I'm sure you can reach Q49 as quant requires practice. You have quite a journey. :thumbup:
User avatar
vatsal323
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 09 Oct 2020
Last visit: 08 Jun 2022
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How do we know that "the key" in option A is referring to the 8-pin key and not to the 12-pin key? Shouldn't that be made obvious in the option? I assumed that "the key" meant the 12-pin key. Hence I ended up selecting A as the answer
User avatar
yaygmat
Joined: 05 Aug 2022
Last visit: 25 Mar 2024
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
23
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Location: India
Schools: ISB '25
Schools: ISB '25
Posts: 145
Kudos: 23
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please help explain this question. It seems a bit confusing or perhaps not a great question IMHO.. Experts need your input!
User avatar
Nidhijain94
Joined: 29 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2024
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 103
Location: Japan
Posts: 23
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@e-gmat. cold you provide official answer?
User avatar
mysterymanrog
User avatar
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Jan 2022
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 791
Own Kudos:
714
 [2]
Given Kudos: 559
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.8
Posts: 791
Kudos: 714
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yaygmat
Please help explain this question. It seems a bit confusing or perhaps not a great question IMHO.. Experts need your input!

Not an expert, but I will do my best: The argument basically states that, because a key dating back to 10th Century B.C with 8 pins has been found in Uganda, and those 8 pins are oriented and shaped in a way that is very similar to the modern 12-pin system, the 12-pin system must have been around for at least 3 millennia. The author here makes a huge gap, by saying that because the10th Century B.C key found in Uganda has pins that are similar in orientation and shape to keys used in the modern 12-pin system, it is evidence that the 12-pin system has existed since at least 10th Century B.C. Clearly, this is a very big gap, and there are many reasons why this would not be the case: For example, what if the pin size and shape were just pure coincidence? It is entirely possible to assume that it might have been accidental, and there was no 12-pin system ever invented. Since this is a strengthen question, we must find a statement that does its best to fill the gap.

A) This just adds more info to the nature of the discovered key - it does not help us fill the logical gap. The key could have been made from any material that is native to Uganda, but this does not answer anything to the 12-pin system. Out.

B) We are not concerned about the cylinder lock mechanism or about neanderthals. It is possible that it was the least secure, or the most secure. It does not tell us if the 12-pin system actually existed in the time period the author is claiming to. Out.

C) This is tricky, but it does not tell us about existence of 12-pin lock systems. All we know is that there are no other similar lock systems - nothing is stated about the possible number of pins that could exist in a given lock in that time period.

D) This may be true, however it does not tell us about the 12-pin system. It is possible that there was just an 8-pin system from 9th century AD, and that key is merely for an 8-pin system. This is not specific enough to fill our logical gap.

E) This is a the best of the worst. The idea behind E is that, if the key is made in such a way that a 12-pin key is possible, then the authors position is strengthened. This statement removes a possible weakener to the authors argument - the material is good enough to be used for a 12-pin key. If this was not the case, one could argue that the key is actually evidence that the 12-pin system did not exist long before that, since the key could never be made with 12-pins - the material does not support that kind of key.
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,173
Own Kudos:
11,462
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,862
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,173
Kudos: 11,462
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nidhijain94
@e-gmat. cold you provide official answer?

The question is modelled form / inspired by this official question. You can consider referring to the discussions in the official question and apply similar logic to this question.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts