One theory of school governance can be pictured as an upside-down triangle. Students, teachers and the faculty/parent committee make up the body of the triangle, but the triangle has no point, that is, it has no school principal. Schools are run by the faculty/parent committee, which makes all significant decisions concerning academic standards, curriculum, discipline, extra-curricular activities, etc. As a result, under this theory, innovative teaching methods and progressive academic programs cannot be implemented.
The argument depends upon which one of the following assumptions?
The argument describes a method (theory) of governance and states that this method doesn't have a principal.
Then the argument jumps to the conclusion: under this theory, innovative teaching methods and progressive academic programs cannot be implemented.
The only assumption I can think of is that a principal is somehow crucial to the implementation of innovative teaching methods and progressive academic programs. (A) Innovative teaching methods and progressive academic programs are usually implemented by individual private schools, not by public school systems.
- INCORRECT. Public- Private split is not discussed.(B) Only principals will try new methods and programs.
-
CORRECT, As per our prethinking.(C) A person acting by himself is more likely to direct that new methods be tried than if he is acting as part of a committee.
-INCORRECT. No reason for such an assumption is given in the passage.
(D) All school principals achieved their positions by taking academic risks.
-
INCORRECT. How principals achieve their position is irrelevant.(E) All innovative teaching methods and progressive academic programs encompass some risk.
-
INCORRECT. Risk of any kind isn't discussed.IMO B.