YB114
KarishmaB ,
I see this multiple time in Boldface question also when there claim like some people believed that, some XX claimed that, then that
part is taken as a premise only , here also some parents' claim taken as a fact and whenever there is claims from one side (like scientist, environmentalist (side other than author)) and their claims supported with evidence taken as conclusion.
So there is anything like that when there a claim from a portion of people then it is taken as fact and when a claim from a side with supportive evidence then it is taken as conclusion ?
i know i am trying to make unnecessary pattern here but just curious .
Claim/Opinion/Hypothesis of a person are all conclusions. They need supporting data. By themselves, they are just claims. If I say, "I think ScarJo is very pretty," does it become a fact/data? No. It is just my opinion. Parent's claim is just that - their opinion. There needs to be data to support it.
The results of a study/research etc are usually taken to be premises by an argument. The author gives the result to support his case. A study revealed that most people do not like apples these days. So the reason for the current reduction in the sale of apples is the changing tastes of people.
'Most people do not like apples' has been taken as a premise by the author. Here we know that the conclusion is 'the reason for the current reduction in the sale of apples is the changing tastes of people' - author's opinion.
Sometimes, a question stem could ask us to strengthen the conclusion of researchers who conducted a study.
e.g. Which of the following supports the conclusion of the researchers?
We need to find what the researchers concluded based on the study results and then strengthen that. The question stem makes it all clear.
If the question stem says "Which of the following strengthens the argument above?" then we need to look for the author's own conclusion in the argument and strengthen that. We cannot look for data strengthening anyone else's claim/conclusion.
In the question above, we have the following:
Results of a study (premise): children who have television sets in their bedrooms achieve, on average, school grades much lower than those without television sets in their bedrooms.
Ministry's conclusion: children who do not have television sets in their bedrooms are more likely to have greater success in college programs later on than children who do.
Parent's claim : it was not the fact that their children had television sets in their rooms that affected their grades, but that the programs that were shown contained little or no educational value.
There is no defined conclusion of the argument hence we don't know at which "above conclusion" are we looking.