Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 14:17 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 14:17
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
avatar
Bhavz10
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2019
Last visit: 11 Nov 2020
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
49
 [34]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'22 (A) ISB'22 IIMB EPGP'22 LBS '22
Schools: IIMA PGPX'22 (A) ISB'22 IIMB EPGP'22 LBS '22
Posts: 56
Kudos: 49
 [34]
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 05 Jun 2020, 06:59
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (02:06) correct 40% (02:08) wrong based on 686 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,002
 [9]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,002
 [9]
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 05 Jun 2020, 19:55
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
Show more

The answer would depend on the rates of both.

1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take x+4 to make 2y pots.
So, if M takes 1 hr for 1 pot ( \(R_M = 1\) per hour), T will take 1+4 or 5 hrs to make 2*1 or 2 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{2}{5}\) per hour). M>T
But, if M takes 20 hr for 40 pot ( \(R_M = 2\) per hour), T will take 20+4 or 24 hrs to make 2*40 or 80 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{80}{24}=3.33\) per hour). M<T

2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take 2x to make 3y pots OR x hrs to make 3y/2 pots. 3y/2>y, so T will always make more pots in the given time
Suff

B
General Discussion
User avatar
gurmukh
User avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2017
Last visit: 30 Dec 2025
Posts: 258
Own Kudos:
269
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 258
Kudos: 269
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 05 Jun 2020, 20:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From first statement
Case 1
Let Matt takes 10 hours to make 10 pots so he will take 100 hours to make 100 pots. Now tom produces 20 pots in 14 hours so he will make 100 pots in 70 hours.
Case 2
Let Matt takes 2 hours to make 10 pots so he will make 100 pots in 20 hours. Now tom produces 20 pots in 6 hours so he will make 100 pots in 30 hours.
Both the cases give different answer so this statement is insufficient.
From statement 2
Tom's rate is 3/2 times the rate of Matt so will take less time than Matt, hence sufficient.
So answer is B

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Bhavz10
avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2019
Last visit: 11 Nov 2020
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 44
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'22 (A) ISB'22 IIMB EPGP'22 LBS '22
Schools: IIMA PGPX'22 (A) ISB'22 IIMB EPGP'22 LBS '22
Posts: 56
Kudos: 49
 [1]
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 05 Jun 2020, 23:02
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.

The answer would depend on the rates of both.

1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take x+4 to make 2y pots.
So, if M takes 1 hr for 1 pot ( \(R_M = 1\) per hour), T will take 1+4 or 5 hrs to make 2*1 or 2 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{2}{5}\) per hour). M>T
But, if M takes 20 hr for 40 pot ( \(R_M = 2\) per hour), T will take 20+4 or 24 hrs to make 2*40 or 80 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{80}{24}=3.33\) per hour). M<T

2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take 2x to make 3y pots OR x hrs to make 3y/2 pots. 3y/2>y, so T will always make more pots in the given time
Suff

B
Show more

Is there any other way to solve this without taking numbers as example? By equations? In under 2 minutes.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
RaghavKhanna
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2020
Last visit: 23 Aug 2025
Posts: 264
Own Kudos:
312
Given Kudos: 675
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 264
Kudos: 312
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 06 Jul 2020, 04:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel Sir,
Is there any better method to solve this question without plugging values?
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,002
 [2]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,002
 [2]
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 06 Jul 2020, 07:17
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
Show more


Another method.
Let the time taken be M and T, so we are looking for - Is M>T?

Statement I
Matt takes M hrs for 100 pots, so Tom takes M+4 to produce 2*100 pots, that is (M+4)/2 to produce 200/2 pots.
Thus T=(M+4)/2.
Question was is T>M or is (M+4)/2>M.....M+4>2M or Is M<4?
Maybe or maybe not

Statement II
Matt takes M hrs for 100 pots, so Tom takes 2M to produce 3*100 pots, that is 2M/3 to produce 300/3 pots.
Thus T=2M/3
Question was - is T>M or is 2M/3>M?
Since M is positive, answer is NO.
Sufficient

B

Hope it helps
User avatar
satya2029
User avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2017
Last visit: 29 Sep 2025
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
254
Given Kudos: 138
Location: India
Posts: 229
Kudos: 254
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 06 Jul 2020, 09:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
Show more
From the Question stem it is clear that we need comparison ( Ratio) of respective rates of T and M
From 1
T*(X+4)=200
MX=100
T/M=2X/X+4
at X=4
T=M
but at X=2
T/M=2/3
Not Sufficient

From 2
T*2X=300
M*X=100
T/M=3/2
Sufficient
B:)
avatar
ouslam
avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2020
Last visit: 25 Mar 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 72
Posts: 20
Kudos: 20
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 21 Jul 2020, 00:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RaghavKhanna
Bunuel Sir,
Is there any better method to solve this question without plugging values?
Show more

I know the way I solved this problem might look weird but here's how I did it , I didn't use calculation at all ,I know we can answer this question if we find Tom is faster than Foster or vice versa , if I find it I can answer the question , in order to find the work rate and since they are using a comparison , the comparison needs to be on the same ground , I will explain how I solved this problem logically (yes in DS you can save time by not calculating)

so let's start with the first statement:
Quote:
Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
Show more

in just two examples i will show how with this statement can make Tom faster than Matt and vice versa

let's say that Matt produces X amount of pots in 1 hour , so Tom produces 2X in five hours , the work rate of matt is X pot/hour , and Tom is Xpots/2.5 hours , matt is faster than Tom , so under these conditions , Matt is faster.

Another case , Matt produces X amount of pots in 20 hours , so Tom produces 2X in 25 hours , the work rate of Matt is 0.2X/hour , and Tom rate is 0.25X/hour, now Tom in this case is faster

1 insufficient.

for the statement 2: this one will always give us one answer (sufficient)

for example Tom takes 2* T to produce 3* X (T is time for matt to produce X matt) , so Tom has a work rate of 3*X/2*T it means 1.5 X pots / T hours , whereas matt takes X pot/ T hours , so here Tom is always faster

B is correct.

understanding this concept makes you answer this question in 50 seconds.
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
User avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
3,905
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,905
 [1]
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 27 Feb 2021, 05:01
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
Show more

Question stem, rephrased:
Is Tom slower than Matt?

Statement 1:
Case 1: Matt produces 1 pot in 1 hour, with the result that Matt's rate = work/time = 1/1 = 1 pot per hour
Since Tom takes 4 more hours to produce twice the number of pots, Tom takes 5 hours to produce 2 pots, with the result that Tom's rate = work/time = 2/5 pot per hour.
In this case, Tom is SLOWER than Matt, so the answer to the rephrased question stem is YES.

Case 2: Matt produces 10 pots in 10 hours, with the result that Matt's rate = work/time = 10/10 = 1 pot per hour
Since Tom takes 4 more hours to produce twice the number of pots, Tom takes 14 hours to produce 20 pots, with the result that Tom's rate = work/time = 20/14 = 10/7 pots per hour
In this case, Tom is FASTER than Matt, so the answer to the rephrased question stem is NO.

Since the answer is YES in Case 1 but NO in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
If Tom and Matt were to work at the same rate, Tom would take 3 times as long as Matt to produce 3 times the number of pots.
Since Tom only takes TWICE as long as Matt to produce 3 times the number of pots, Tom must be FASTER than Matt.
Thus, the answer to the rephrased question stem is NO.
SUFFICIENT.

Show Spoiler
B
User avatar
RenB
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 02 Mar 2026
Posts: 389
Own Kudos:
1,469
Given Kudos: 304
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
Schools: Stanford '26 Wharton  '26 (D) Booth '26 (D) Yale '26 (D) CBS '26 (A$$$) Darden '26 (WL) HBS '26 (D) Ross '26 (A$$$$) LBS '26 (D) Tuck '26 (A$$) Kellogg '26 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Schools: Stanford '26 Wharton  '26 (D) Booth '26 (D) Yale '26 (D) CBS '26 (A$$$) Darden '26 (WL) HBS '26 (D) Ross '26 (A$$$$) LBS '26 (D) Tuck '26 (A$$) Kellogg '26 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
Posts: 389
Kudos: 1,469
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 02 Sep 2023, 04:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.

The answer would depend on the rates of both.

1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take x+4 to make 2y pots.
So, if M takes 1 hr for 1 pot ( \(R_M = 1\) per hour), T will take 1+4 or 5 hrs to make 2*1 or 2 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{2}{5}\) per hour). M>T
But, if M takes 20 hr for 40 pot ( \(R_M = 2\) per hour), T will take 20+4 or 24 hrs to make 2*40 or 80 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{80}{24}=3.33\) per hour). M<T

2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take 2x to make 3y pots OR x hrs to make 3y/2 pots. 3y/2>y, so T will always make more pots in the given time
Suff

B
Show more

Hi,
KarishmaB ScottTargetTestPrep chetan2u Bunuel
Isnt statement 1 ambiguous? Can't A mean that T takes 4 hours more than M does to make twice the number of pots?
Say M takes m hours to make x pots, thus will take 2m hours to make 2x pots. I considered- T will take 2m+4 hours to make twice the number of pots (2x)
Seeking your guidance.
TIA!
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,396
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,396
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 02 Sep 2023, 05:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RenB
chetan2u
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.

The answer would depend on the rates of both.

1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take x+4 to make 2y pots.
So, if M takes 1 hr for 1 pot ( \(R_M = 1\) per hour), T will take 1+4 or 5 hrs to make 2*1 or 2 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{2}{5}\) per hour). M>T
But, if M takes 20 hr for 40 pot ( \(R_M = 2\) per hour), T will take 20+4 or 24 hrs to make 2*40 or 80 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{80}{24}=3.33\) per hour). M<T

2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take 2x to make 3y pots OR x hrs to make 3y/2 pots. 3y/2>y, so T will always make more pots in the given time
Suff

B

Hi,
KarishmaB ScottTargetTestPrep chetan2u Bunuel
Isnt statement 1 ambiguous? Can't A mean that T takes 4 hours more than M does to make twice the number of pots?
Say M takes m hours to make x pots, thus will take 2m hours to make 2x pots. I considered- T will take 2m+4 hours to make twice the number of pots (2x)
Seeking your guidance.
TIA!
Show more

It is not a good question. Statement 1 is ambiguous - I am not sure what it means. We cannot make a generic statement like this.

The question is just this: Is Tom slower than Matt?

1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.

I wondered here whether they mean Tom takes 4 hours more to make 200 pots? But I wasn't convinced.

To give the information that they intended to give they should have said that on a particular day, Tom took 4 more hours and produced twice the number of pots than Matt did. Then it makes sense because we are talking about one particular instance. We cannot use a generic statement 'Tom takes 4 hours more to produce twice the number of pots' because that will not be true for all n (the number of pots made).

Take an example:
Say Matt takes 4 hours to make 100 pots.
Then Tom takes 8 hrs to make 200 pots.

Say Matt takes 8 hours to make 200 pots.
Then Tom will take 16 hrs to make 400 pots (not 12 hrs)

So this statement cannot hold for all values of n. For only one value of n, will the time taken by Tom be 4 hrs more.
To show an instance, we cannot use a generic statement.


2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.

This is alright. Now we have the ratio in both cases.
Tom does thrice the work in twice the time so he is faster than Matt.
Sufficient alone.
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 22,283
Own Kudos:
26,531
Given Kudos: 302
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 22,283
Kudos: 26,531
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 11 Sep 2023, 17:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RenB
chetan2u
Bhavz10
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made pots. Did Tom take more time than Matt to make 100 pots?
1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.

The answer would depend on the rates of both.

1. Tom takes 4 hours more than Matt to produce twice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take x+4 to make 2y pots.
So, if M takes 1 hr for 1 pot ( \(R_M = 1\) per hour), T will take 1+4 or 5 hrs to make 2*1 or 2 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{2}{5}\) per hour). M>T
But, if M takes 20 hr for 40 pot ( \(R_M = 2\) per hour), T will take 20+4 or 24 hrs to make 2*40 or 80 pots ( \(R_T = \frac{80}{24}=3.33\) per hour). M<T

2. Tom takes twice the time as Matt to produce thrice the number of pots.
If M takes x hrs to make y pots, T will take 2x to make 3y pots OR x hrs to make 3y/2 pots. 3y/2>y, so T will always make more pots in the given time
Suff

B

Hi,
KarishmaB ScottTargetTestPrep chetan2u Bunuel
Isnt statement 1 ambiguous? Can't A mean that T takes 4 hours more than M does to make twice the number of pots?
Say M takes m hours to make x pots, thus will take 2m hours to make 2x pots. I considered- T will take 2m+4 hours to make twice the number of pots (2x)
Seeking your guidance.
TIA!
Show more

I agree with what's already said, I think what's meant in statement one is "It would take 4 more hours for Tom to produce 2n pots than for Matt to produce n pots, where n is some positive integer". However, I don't think your interpretation of the statement is correct. With your numbers, Tom and Matt end up producing the same number of pots (2x) with a 4 hour time difference (2m vs 2m + 4), but the statement is actually trying to tell us that if Tom works 4 hours more than Matt, he will produce twice the number of pots as Matt does. The issue here is that this will only hold for a specific number of pots, as mentioned earlier.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,962
Own Kudos:
1,117
Posts: 38,962
Kudos: 1,117
Working together at their respective constant rates, Tom and Matt made 24 Jun 2025, 11:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
109785 posts
kingbucky
498 posts
Gmat860sanskar
212 posts